'A cowardly, deluded drunken waster': readers on their favourite unlikable movie characters

For many viewers, some of the most compelling characters in cinema are those who defy traditional notions of likability. Take Willie Soke, for instance, the rough-around-the-edges Santa Claus from the 1993 comedy 'Bad Santa'. While his demeanor may be intimidating at first glance, he surprises us with a heroic act that reveals a more vulnerable side to his character.

Similarly, Alex DeLarge from Stanley Kubrick's 'A Clockwork Orange' defies conventional expectations. On paper, he appears to be an unrepentant sociopath who wreaks havoc on the world around him. However, Malcolm McDowell brings a level of charm and charisma to the role that makes us both fascinated and repelled.

In contrast, Emily Bennetto from 'Emily the Criminal' is a more complex character. On the surface, she appears to be ruthless and cunning, but her interactions with other characters suggest a deep-seated vulnerability. It's this complexity that makes her so compelling to watch.

Pulp Fiction's Jules Winnfield is another character who walks a fine line between likeability and despicability. Played by Samuel L. Jackson, he is a morally ambiguous hitman who spouts wisdom on the nature of humanity, making him both relatable and fascinating.

Some viewers also find themselves drawn to the lovably despicable Tommy DeVito from 'Goodfellas'. His charisma and confidence make him an incredibly captivating character, even as we witness his cruel and violent tendencies.

More recent films like 'Uncut Gems' have brought attention to characters who are struggling with addiction and destructive behavior. Howard Ratner, played by Adam Sandler, is a complex figure whose flaws make him both repellent and sympathetic at the same time.

And then there's Sebastian Valmont from 'Dangerous Liaisons', a character whose descent into depravity is both captivating and heartbreaking. His presence has been enough to move audiences to tears in the cinema, demonstrating his ability to evoke strong emotions.

In contrast, some characters are straightforwardly unlikeable. For instance, Harriet Potter from 'Carry On Camping' is an appalling individual who consistently disregards the well-being of those around her. Her callousness is hard to ignore and makes for uncomfortable viewing.

Finally, there's Withnail, a character who embodies the spirit of a cowardly, deluded drunken waster. While his actions are questionable, his relatability factor can't be denied. He's a flawed but ultimately sympathetic figure that leaves audiences both repelled and intrigued.

These complex characters remind us that cinematic characters often exist on a spectrum of likability rather than falling into neat binary categories. They challenge our expectations, evoke strong emotions, and leave us questioning our own moral compasses.
 
πŸ€” I'm all about those morally ambiguous characters in movies - you know, the ones who'll make you go from "ugh" to "wait, what?" in a split second! πŸŽ₯ Think of people like Alex DeLarge or Sebastian Valmont - they're so complex and multi-dimensional that it's hard not to be drawn in. And can we talk about how captivating they are when they're being their most despicable selves? 😏 It's like you're watching a train wreck in slow motion, knowing you shouldn't look but just can't help yourself! πŸš‚ But what I love is that these characters often make us question our own morals and empathy - it's like they're pushing us to see the world from a different perspective. πŸ’‘
 
I don't think some of these characters are as deep as people make them out to be... I mean, Willie Soke is just a total psycho 🀑 and doesn't really have any redeeming qualities, but at the same time, his act does show a softer side, so yeah, it's kinda ambiguous. And Alex DeLarge, he's definitely charismatic, but you can see the sociopath vibes from a mile away 😏.

On the other hand, I think characters like Jules Winnfield are just way too cool to be likable, in a bad way... He's got that wise guy thing down pat, and it's hard not to love him, even though he's basically a hitman πŸ€–. And Emily Bennetto, she's definitely complex, but I think her complexity is overhyped, you know? She's just a normal person with some problems.

And don't even get me started on Howard Ratner... Adam Sandler can be hilarious in comedies, but here he's just annoying πŸ˜’. Sebastian Valmont, though, that guy's got some serious issues, but it's hard not to feel for him when he's being so despicable πŸ€·β€β™‚οΈ.

But, I gotta say, with characters like Harriet Potter and Withnail, I'm all about the love 'em or hate 'em vibe. If you can't tell if someone is a total psycho or just a little weird, then they're doing their job right πŸ˜‚.
 
[Image of a character with a split personality, one side smiling and the other frowning] 😐🀯 The more complex characters in movies are so fascinating because they make you feel something but can't be summed up by just being likable or despicable. It's like they're made of many layers of messy emotions πŸ€·β€β™‚οΈ
 
😊 I think these characters are so fascinating because they make us question what we consider 'likable'. Like, who wouldn't love a despicable Tommy DeVito? 🀣 But at the same time, it's refreshing to see complexity in characters that can both repel and attract us. It shows that cinema isn't just about heroes or villains, but about people (or characters) with flaws we can relate to.

I mean, have you seen Sebastian Valmont from 'Dangerous Liaisons'? That guy is so captivatingly awful it's hard not to feel for him at the same time! And Jules Winnfield? He's like that one friend who always has a wise phrase ready. 🀣

What I love about these characters is how they challenge our expectations and make us think about what we consider 'likable'. It's a reminder that life isn't always black and white, and cinema can be just as nuanced.

But what do you guys think? Do you have a favorite character like this? πŸ€”
 
The more I think about these iconic characters the more I realize how much we can learn from their complexities 🀯. Like Willie Soke, they're rough around the edges but end up surprising us with their human side. And yeah, Alex DeLarge is like that too - all tough exterior and vulnerability in there somewhere πŸ’”. It's crazy how movies can make you root for someone who's, on paper, a total bad guy πŸ€ͺ. And I'm so down for watching some of these characters' flaws and imperfections because it makes them all the more real to me 😊
 
I'm so over these new school movies with the "villains" who are just too darn likable πŸ˜’πŸ‘Ž. Give me a good ol' fashioned anti-hero any day of the week! I mean, what's wrong with a character like Tommy DeVito from Goodfellas? He's got charisma for days and still manages to be a total tool πŸ€ͺ. And don't even get me started on Harriet Potter from Carry On Camping - she's just so extra πŸ˜‚.

I love how these movies are pushing the boundaries of what we consider "likable" though. It's like, I get it, complex characters are cool and all that jazz πŸ’―. But sometimes I just want a good ol' fashioned bad guy who's gonna make my blood boil πŸ”₯. You know, like Withnail from the same movie - he's just so... withnaily πŸ˜‚.

And can we talk about the 90s for a second? πŸ•°οΈ That's when movies started getting really bold and pushing the envelope. I mean, Bad Santa was like, the ultimate anti-Christmas movie πŸŽ„. And Alex DeLarge from A Clockwork Orange? Forget about it 🀯. He's like the original sociopath πŸ˜‚.

I guess what I'm saying is, bring on the complex characters and all that jazz πŸŽ₯. Just don't expect me to go out of my way to root for them πŸ˜‚.
 
πŸ€” I think what makes these characters so interesting is how they can be both lovable and despicable at the same time πŸ€·β€β™‚οΈ it's like we're seeing a part of ourselves in them, even when we don't want to admit it 😬 some characters are just so complex and multi-layered that we can't help but be drawn to them πŸ’” like Tommy DeVito from 'Goodfellas' - he's got this charisma that makes us root for him despite all his wrongdoings 🀣
 
πŸ€” I love how these characters can be super despicable but still somehow make you root for them? Like, Tommy DeVito is literally a sociopath but his charisma makes him so interesting to watch πŸ€‘. And Withnail's just so relatable, you're like "same dude" πŸ˜‚. But at the same time, they all have these deeper complexities that make them way more interesting than your average likable character πŸ‘. It's like, we get to see the good and the bad in these people and it's really thought-provoking 🀯. Emily Bennetto from "Emily the Criminal" is a big one for me too, she's like this rough-around-the-edges con artist but you can't help but feel for her πŸ˜”. What do you think about characters that walk that fine line between likability and despicability?
 
I mean, I'm all for having some anti-heroes in movies, but can't they just be written better? Like, take 'Bad Santa' - Willie Soke's all fun and games at first, but the character development is so forced. And don't even get me started on how predictable the ending is πŸ€¦β€β™‚οΈ.

And what's up with all these characters who are just kinda... messy? I mean, Emily Bennetto from 'Emily the Criminal' is cool and all, but her backstory could've been fleshed out more. It feels like they're relying on "oh, she's so complex and stuff" instead of actually showing us how that complexity works πŸ€”.

And then there's Pulp Fiction's Jules Winnfield - he's just too perfect. Like, his entire moral ambiguity thing? Come on. He's basically a smooth-talking philosophical hitman. It feels like they're trying too hard to make him relatable πŸ˜’.

I guess what I'm saying is that sometimes it feels like these "complex characters" are just an excuse for writers to be lazy πŸ™„. Give me some actual depth and character development over this whole "we're gonna make you feel uncomfortable, but also kinda empathize with them" nonsense 😴.
 
Back
Top