The Notorious Type A Personality - Do We Really Need It?
In the 1950s, a keen-eyed secretary working at a San Francisco medical office made an observation that would change the face of psychology forever. She noticed patients with coronary disease sitting in hard-upholstered chairs and quickly getting up when their names were called. This insight was seized upon by cardiologists Dr Ray Rosenman and Dr Meyer Friedman, who coined the term "Type A" personality to describe competitive, productivity-obsessed individuals prone to aggressive behavior.
Their research posited that these Type A personalities were more likely to suffer from heart attacks. This concept gained widespread attention, including a bestselling book, "Type A Behaviour and Your Heart." However, the industry's exploitation of this idea was swift and ruthless. The tobacco industry co-opted the research to argue that smoking didn't cause cancer but rather that smokers were more prone to being Type A, thereby contributing to their health problems.
Fast-forward to TikTok, where personality classification is all the rage among teens. You can almost hear the sound of 1,200 tabs opening as people dive headfirst into researching and obsessing over their personalities. I'm guilty of it too - when I stumbled upon a viral video about Type A personalities, my productivity went out the window.
The search for the mysterious secretary who initially sparked this concept was a fun exercise, but ultimately futile. If she existed (and some accounts say so), her name remains elusive. So, what can we take away from this phenomenon? Most personality "science" is, frankly, rubbish. We're desperate for organisational systems to make sense of ourselves and the world, so any theory that promises clarity is bound to grab our attention.
My takeaway from all this is clear: I need to work on my procrastination issues. So, let's leave Type A personalities aside and focus on what really matters - becoming more productive and less stuck in a cycle of distraction. After all, there's enough junk science out there without needing any more of it.
In the 1950s, a keen-eyed secretary working at a San Francisco medical office made an observation that would change the face of psychology forever. She noticed patients with coronary disease sitting in hard-upholstered chairs and quickly getting up when their names were called. This insight was seized upon by cardiologists Dr Ray Rosenman and Dr Meyer Friedman, who coined the term "Type A" personality to describe competitive, productivity-obsessed individuals prone to aggressive behavior.
Their research posited that these Type A personalities were more likely to suffer from heart attacks. This concept gained widespread attention, including a bestselling book, "Type A Behaviour and Your Heart." However, the industry's exploitation of this idea was swift and ruthless. The tobacco industry co-opted the research to argue that smoking didn't cause cancer but rather that smokers were more prone to being Type A, thereby contributing to their health problems.
Fast-forward to TikTok, where personality classification is all the rage among teens. You can almost hear the sound of 1,200 tabs opening as people dive headfirst into researching and obsessing over their personalities. I'm guilty of it too - when I stumbled upon a viral video about Type A personalities, my productivity went out the window.
The search for the mysterious secretary who initially sparked this concept was a fun exercise, but ultimately futile. If she existed (and some accounts say so), her name remains elusive. So, what can we take away from this phenomenon? Most personality "science" is, frankly, rubbish. We're desperate for organisational systems to make sense of ourselves and the world, so any theory that promises clarity is bound to grab our attention.
My takeaway from all this is clear: I need to work on my procrastination issues. So, let's leave Type A personalities aside and focus on what really matters - becoming more productive and less stuck in a cycle of distraction. After all, there's enough junk science out there without needing any more of it.