Bare-knuckle boxing - a sport where fighters don't wear gloves, and the stakes are high. The UK's first sanctioned bare-knuckle fighting championship is coming to Derby, with promoters claiming that their version of the sport is safer than traditional boxing. But others say it's just as brutal.
The controversy over bare-knuckle boxing has been ongoing for years. Critics argue that the lack of gloves increases the risk of serious injury, including concussions and broken bones. However, proponents of the sport claim that it's a more authentic form of combat sports, where fighters must rely on their wits and physical skill to outmaneuver their opponents.
One of the reasons for its growing popularity is the rise of social media influencers like Conor McGregor, who owns part of the Bare Knuckle Fighting Championship (BKFC). These fighters have become celebrities in their own right, with millions of followers hanging on their every move. But some say that this increased visibility comes at a cost - a lack of safety precautions and a disregard for the well-being of athletes.
Despite the risks, many fighters are turning to bare-knuckle boxing as a way out of mental health struggles or as a new challenge after years of traditional boxing. For Luke Brassfield, a 38-year-old middleweight fighter from Long Eaton in Derbyshire, bare-knuckle fighting has become a way to release his emotions and find positivity.
"I want to get onto a big platform to spread the word about mental health and positivity," he said. "There is a way out of rock bottom, and the rise is beautiful."
While some say that bare-knuckle boxing is irresponsible, others argue that it's just as exciting as traditional boxing - if not more so. The lack of gloves adds an element of brutality to the sport, but also makes it more raw and visceral.
As the debate rages on, one thing is clear: bare-knuckle boxing is here to stay. With its growing popularity and increasing visibility, it's time for us to take a closer look at this contentious sport and decide for ourselves whether it's worth embracing or rejecting.
The controversy over bare-knuckle boxing has been ongoing for years. Critics argue that the lack of gloves increases the risk of serious injury, including concussions and broken bones. However, proponents of the sport claim that it's a more authentic form of combat sports, where fighters must rely on their wits and physical skill to outmaneuver their opponents.
One of the reasons for its growing popularity is the rise of social media influencers like Conor McGregor, who owns part of the Bare Knuckle Fighting Championship (BKFC). These fighters have become celebrities in their own right, with millions of followers hanging on their every move. But some say that this increased visibility comes at a cost - a lack of safety precautions and a disregard for the well-being of athletes.
Despite the risks, many fighters are turning to bare-knuckle boxing as a way out of mental health struggles or as a new challenge after years of traditional boxing. For Luke Brassfield, a 38-year-old middleweight fighter from Long Eaton in Derbyshire, bare-knuckle fighting has become a way to release his emotions and find positivity.
"I want to get onto a big platform to spread the word about mental health and positivity," he said. "There is a way out of rock bottom, and the rise is beautiful."
While some say that bare-knuckle boxing is irresponsible, others argue that it's just as exciting as traditional boxing - if not more so. The lack of gloves adds an element of brutality to the sport, but also makes it more raw and visceral.
As the debate rages on, one thing is clear: bare-knuckle boxing is here to stay. With its growing popularity and increasing visibility, it's time for us to take a closer look at this contentious sport and decide for ourselves whether it's worth embracing or rejecting.