California Seeks Judicial Intervention as Trump Administration Pushes Ahead with Oil Pipeline Revival Plans
In a move that could have significant environmental implications, California has filed a lawsuit against the federal government, alleging that the administration's recent approval of plans to restart two oil pipelines along its coast was done in defiance of state regulatory authority.
The Texas-based company Sable Offshore Corp. had proposed restarting production on the damaged Las Flores Pipeline in waters off Santa Barbara, which spilled over 140,000 gallons of oil in 2015. The spill had a devastating impact on local wildlife and ecosystems, with scores of pelicans, seals, and dolphins killed, and the fishing industry decimated.
Despite California's objections, the U.S. Transportation Department agency that approved Sable's plan argued that the pipeline restart would bring much-needed energy to a state with some of the highest gas prices in the country. However, critics point out that the plans could harm coastal communities and ecosystems, and that the federal government is ignoring painful lessons learned from the 2015 oil spill.
"This is crazy," said Alex Katz, executive director of the Environmental Defense Center. "We're talking about restarting a pipeline that was shut down after one of the worst environmental disasters in California's history."
California Attorney General Rob Bonta took a strong stance against the federal government's actions, stating, "The federal administration has no right to usurp California's regulatory authority. We're taking them to court to draw a line in the sand and to protect our coast, beaches, and communities from potentially hazardous pipelines."
As tensions rise over offshore oil drilling, it remains to be seen whether California will prevail in its lawsuit or if the Trump administration will push forward with plans to revive domestic energy production.
In a move that could have significant environmental implications, California has filed a lawsuit against the federal government, alleging that the administration's recent approval of plans to restart two oil pipelines along its coast was done in defiance of state regulatory authority.
The Texas-based company Sable Offshore Corp. had proposed restarting production on the damaged Las Flores Pipeline in waters off Santa Barbara, which spilled over 140,000 gallons of oil in 2015. The spill had a devastating impact on local wildlife and ecosystems, with scores of pelicans, seals, and dolphins killed, and the fishing industry decimated.
Despite California's objections, the U.S. Transportation Department agency that approved Sable's plan argued that the pipeline restart would bring much-needed energy to a state with some of the highest gas prices in the country. However, critics point out that the plans could harm coastal communities and ecosystems, and that the federal government is ignoring painful lessons learned from the 2015 oil spill.
"This is crazy," said Alex Katz, executive director of the Environmental Defense Center. "We're talking about restarting a pipeline that was shut down after one of the worst environmental disasters in California's history."
California Attorney General Rob Bonta took a strong stance against the federal government's actions, stating, "The federal administration has no right to usurp California's regulatory authority. We're taking them to court to draw a line in the sand and to protect our coast, beaches, and communities from potentially hazardous pipelines."
As tensions rise over offshore oil drilling, it remains to be seen whether California will prevail in its lawsuit or if the Trump administration will push forward with plans to revive domestic energy production.