The world's biggest conference for nations dealing with climate change just started, and for the first time ever, leaders have officially said they want to 'transition away from fossil fuels'.
To many, this is a major victory. Fossil fuels are at the heart of global warming, and burning them releases massive amounts of carbon dioxide into the atmosphere that trap heat and accelerate rising temperatures.
The transition won't be easy or quick – not even close to it. But for the first time ever, countries have started talking about phasing out fossil fuels as an option.
The move was made in a resolution passed during COP28, in Dubai last year. It stated "countries should work together to achieve a global net-zero emissions future". The resolution added that if every country took action, by 2050, the world could be carbon neutral.
There has been mixed reaction to this move from fossil fuel producers and consumers. Some argue it is too little, too late – the damage caused by climate change cannot be reversed in our lifetimes.
While others welcome the step forward. For many countries, especially those that are rich on fossil fuels, this means a major shift away from their main source of income.
Many say phasing out fossil fuel production will require huge investments and policy changes across the world. Others argue it is unrealistic to expect any country to give up its oil and gas reserves completely.
Brazil's COP30 is taking place now – one of the countries that welcomed this resolution. Brazil does not believe it has enough power over the agenda but can be guided by what parties want.
Some countries are calling for a declaration on transitioning away from fossil fuels, while others are proposing the "fossil fuel nonproliferation treaty." They say they will work together to reduce their reliance on these fuels – even if they don't agree on how.
A proposal has been put forward in Colombia about moving towards 'carbon neutrality' by 2050. Several countries have signed up to this initiative but a roadmap has not yet been agreed upon.
If successful, it would mean that almost all countries involved could participate in an ongoing dialogue and set targets for phasing out their use of fossil fuels.
To many, this is a major victory. Fossil fuels are at the heart of global warming, and burning them releases massive amounts of carbon dioxide into the atmosphere that trap heat and accelerate rising temperatures.
The transition won't be easy or quick – not even close to it. But for the first time ever, countries have started talking about phasing out fossil fuels as an option.
The move was made in a resolution passed during COP28, in Dubai last year. It stated "countries should work together to achieve a global net-zero emissions future". The resolution added that if every country took action, by 2050, the world could be carbon neutral.
There has been mixed reaction to this move from fossil fuel producers and consumers. Some argue it is too little, too late – the damage caused by climate change cannot be reversed in our lifetimes.
While others welcome the step forward. For many countries, especially those that are rich on fossil fuels, this means a major shift away from their main source of income.
Many say phasing out fossil fuel production will require huge investments and policy changes across the world. Others argue it is unrealistic to expect any country to give up its oil and gas reserves completely.
Brazil's COP30 is taking place now – one of the countries that welcomed this resolution. Brazil does not believe it has enough power over the agenda but can be guided by what parties want.
Some countries are calling for a declaration on transitioning away from fossil fuels, while others are proposing the "fossil fuel nonproliferation treaty." They say they will work together to reduce their reliance on these fuels – even if they don't agree on how.
A proposal has been put forward in Colombia about moving towards 'carbon neutrality' by 2050. Several countries have signed up to this initiative but a roadmap has not yet been agreed upon.
If successful, it would mean that almost all countries involved could participate in an ongoing dialogue and set targets for phasing out their use of fossil fuels.