European football chiefs are increasingly worried about US President Donald Trump's proposal to annex Greenland. A meeting of around 20 top association heads in Budapest on Monday saw informal discussions about how the sport could respond if Trump escalates his plans.
Football authorities have been tight-lipped about the situation, but they're expected to get more vocal as Trump's demands become more pressing, particularly with the US hosting a significant number of World Cup games this summer. Senior figures are concerned that military aggression towards Greenland would prompt Uefa-led boycotts or other major measures in protest.
Fifa officials are thought unlikely to follow suit, having forged close ties with Trump's government. However, calls for a boycott have resurfaced, and the German politician JΓΌrgen Hardt has recently suggested it could be an option as a last resort. A petition in the Netherlands has gathered over 90,000 signatures.
The Greenland crisis has brought European football leaders together, united by deep concern about Trump's actions. There's recognition that this is a critical moment for Europe's security and future. Most associations are likely to follow their governments' responses, but there's a sense that if one big FA makes a stand, others will follow.
Discussions are set to continue ahead of Uefa's executive committee meeting in Brussels on February 11. However, no concrete steps emerged from the Budapest talks, with the situation moving quickly. A dramatic decision to accept Greenland as a Uefa member is unlikely, given its current isolation in football terms and the confederation's rejection of an application last year.
Fifa officials are also feeling embarrassed about their awarding of the "peace prize" to Trump last December. The organization has since stated that it stands by the award but has sparked controversy over the recipient.
Football authorities have been tight-lipped about the situation, but they're expected to get more vocal as Trump's demands become more pressing, particularly with the US hosting a significant number of World Cup games this summer. Senior figures are concerned that military aggression towards Greenland would prompt Uefa-led boycotts or other major measures in protest.
Fifa officials are thought unlikely to follow suit, having forged close ties with Trump's government. However, calls for a boycott have resurfaced, and the German politician JΓΌrgen Hardt has recently suggested it could be an option as a last resort. A petition in the Netherlands has gathered over 90,000 signatures.
The Greenland crisis has brought European football leaders together, united by deep concern about Trump's actions. There's recognition that this is a critical moment for Europe's security and future. Most associations are likely to follow their governments' responses, but there's a sense that if one big FA makes a stand, others will follow.
Discussions are set to continue ahead of Uefa's executive committee meeting in Brussels on February 11. However, no concrete steps emerged from the Budapest talks, with the situation moving quickly. A dramatic decision to accept Greenland as a Uefa member is unlikely, given its current isolation in football terms and the confederation's rejection of an application last year.
Fifa officials are also feeling embarrassed about their awarding of the "peace prize" to Trump last December. The organization has since stated that it stands by the award but has sparked controversy over the recipient.