Climate crisis and epistemic crisis, two interconnected global threats that are crippling our ability to address the most pressing issue of our time. The problem isn't just the science; it's what we know and how we know it.
For centuries, power has shaped public knowledge, perpetuating false narratives and promoting the interests of those in control. Monarchs once believed they embodied all the nation's interests, while women were deemed unsuited to public life. These blatant falsehoods have been sustained by a vast infrastructure of persuasion built around them.
Fast-forward to today, where the rich own or influence most of our means of communication. They use their platforms to spread propaganda, boosting right-wing and far-right movements that defend wealth and power against redistribution. This has led to an unprecedented hardening of positions in the US, with Trump's allies taking over legacy media platforms.
The ultra-rich have also invested heavily in new media outlets, such as online shows that now outrank traditional television news. A study found that eight out of ten most popular online shows spread climate science denial. Even Elon Musk's X platform, where reporters were fed a glut of right-wing content, suggests an algorithmic bias designed to promote specific ideologies.
This isn't just about the media; it's about who gets to decide what knowledge is credible and what's not. A new study found that politicians on the radical right are most likely to spread misinformation on X. The rich have even managed to infiltrate the BBC, where journalists are often pressured to avoid discussing certain topics or to present a balanced view that favors the interests of those who fund them.
The result is a media climate where governments are retreating from climate action. The International Panel on the Information Environment found that "inaccurate or misleading narratives" in the media about climate breakdown create a feedback loop between scientific denialism and political inaction. This didn't happen by accident; it's the product of a deliberate and systematic assault on knowledge by some of the richest people on Earth.
We need to recognize that public knowledge has always been shaped by power, and that we've never had a "golden age" of unbiased information. We can no longer afford to rely on the generosity of the media or the kindness of governments. Instead, we must create our own sources of credible knowledge, free from the influence of those who seek to manipulate us.
The fight against climate change requires a fundamental transformation in how we understand and share knowledge. It's time for us to take back control of our information landscape and build a world that values truth, science, and human life above all else.
For centuries, power has shaped public knowledge, perpetuating false narratives and promoting the interests of those in control. Monarchs once believed they embodied all the nation's interests, while women were deemed unsuited to public life. These blatant falsehoods have been sustained by a vast infrastructure of persuasion built around them.
Fast-forward to today, where the rich own or influence most of our means of communication. They use their platforms to spread propaganda, boosting right-wing and far-right movements that defend wealth and power against redistribution. This has led to an unprecedented hardening of positions in the US, with Trump's allies taking over legacy media platforms.
The ultra-rich have also invested heavily in new media outlets, such as online shows that now outrank traditional television news. A study found that eight out of ten most popular online shows spread climate science denial. Even Elon Musk's X platform, where reporters were fed a glut of right-wing content, suggests an algorithmic bias designed to promote specific ideologies.
This isn't just about the media; it's about who gets to decide what knowledge is credible and what's not. A new study found that politicians on the radical right are most likely to spread misinformation on X. The rich have even managed to infiltrate the BBC, where journalists are often pressured to avoid discussing certain topics or to present a balanced view that favors the interests of those who fund them.
The result is a media climate where governments are retreating from climate action. The International Panel on the Information Environment found that "inaccurate or misleading narratives" in the media about climate breakdown create a feedback loop between scientific denialism and political inaction. This didn't happen by accident; it's the product of a deliberate and systematic assault on knowledge by some of the richest people on Earth.
We need to recognize that public knowledge has always been shaped by power, and that we've never had a "golden age" of unbiased information. We can no longer afford to rely on the generosity of the media or the kindness of governments. Instead, we must create our own sources of credible knowledge, free from the influence of those who seek to manipulate us.
The fight against climate change requires a fundamental transformation in how we understand and share knowledge. It's time for us to take back control of our information landscape and build a world that values truth, science, and human life above all else.