The Norwegian Nobel Institute has firmly shut down Venezuelan opposition leader María Corina Machado's plan to gift her prestigious Nobel Peace Prize to US President Donald Trump. The move comes after Machado offered to share the award with Trump in response to the recent escalation of violence in Venezuela, including airstrikes and the capture of President Nicolás Maduro.
In a statement released on Friday, the institute made it clear that its rules do not permit prize transfers or revocations. "The facts are clear and well established," it stated. "Once a Nobel Prize is announced, it cannot be revoked, shared, or transferred to others. The decision is final and stands for all time." This stance effectively puts an end to Machado's attempt to use the award as a means of pressuring Trump into taking action on Venezuela.
Machado's move was seen by some as a bold gesture aimed at forcing Trump to take notice of the growing humanitarian crisis in Venezuela. However, it appears that this strategy ultimately backfired when the Nobel Institute stepped in to assert its authority. White House officials have taken issue with Machado's decision, with one insider suggesting that she should have refused the award and instead supported Trump's interests.
Trump himself has expressed skepticism about Machado's actions, claiming that she is not respected by the Venezuelan people. This assertion appears to be a veiled attempt to discredit Machado and undermine her efforts to use the Nobel Peace Prize as leverage with Trump. The incident highlights the challenges faced by those seeking to wield influence through prestigious awards in an increasingly polarized world.
In a statement released on Friday, the institute made it clear that its rules do not permit prize transfers or revocations. "The facts are clear and well established," it stated. "Once a Nobel Prize is announced, it cannot be revoked, shared, or transferred to others. The decision is final and stands for all time." This stance effectively puts an end to Machado's attempt to use the award as a means of pressuring Trump into taking action on Venezuela.
Machado's move was seen by some as a bold gesture aimed at forcing Trump to take notice of the growing humanitarian crisis in Venezuela. However, it appears that this strategy ultimately backfired when the Nobel Institute stepped in to assert its authority. White House officials have taken issue with Machado's decision, with one insider suggesting that she should have refused the award and instead supported Trump's interests.
Trump himself has expressed skepticism about Machado's actions, claiming that she is not respected by the Venezuelan people. This assertion appears to be a veiled attempt to discredit Machado and undermine her efforts to use the Nobel Peace Prize as leverage with Trump. The incident highlights the challenges faced by those seeking to wield influence through prestigious awards in an increasingly polarized world.