Did you solve it? Are you as smart as Spock?

Logic Puzzle Reveals Insights into Human Nature

Imagine being in a game of cookies with two friends, Andy and Bea. The rules are simple: each person can take as many cookies as they like, but there's a catch - no one wants to end up with the most or the least number of cookies, which means finishing with joint most or least is undesirable too.

The puzzle presented by World Logic Day challenges these friends to think rationally and act in their best interests. Andy starts, then Bea, followed by Celine. The goal is not only to have as many cookies as possible but also to avoid ending up on one side of the cookie spectrum or the other.

So how do our three friends navigate this delicate dance? According to the solution, Andy takes 4 cookies, Bea grabs 6, and Celine walks away with nothing. But what if we question this approach?

Taking a closer look at Andy's strategy reveals some interesting dynamics. If he were to take more than 4 cookies, he'd risk ending up with the most or the least number of cookies - two outcomes that are undesirable in this game. Conversely, taking fewer than 4 would leave him vulnerable to Bea's potential move.

Meanwhile, Bea recognizes that if she takes too few cookies, Celine will be left with the majority, which goes against the rules. However, if Bea grabs all the remaining cookies after Andy takes his share of 4, Celine is left with none. This clever move ensures that Bea ends up in the middle, avoiding both extremes.

This logic puzzle highlights human nature's tendency to seek balance and fairness. By playing by the rules, our three friends manage to find a sweet spot where no one wins or loses unfairly. The puzzle serves as a reminder that sometimes, the best solution lies in finding common ground - or, in this case, cookies.
 
i think its kinda cool how they figured out this strategy and all but i mean what if someone like celine wasnt able to take advantage of bea's move? wouldnt that kinda ruin the whole "finding common ground" vibe of it πŸ€”πŸͺ
 
OMG u gotta think abt dis! so i was readin about dis logic puzzle and i'm like "wait, why cant u just take all the cookies lol?" but then u think bout it more and it's kinda deep 🀯. it's like human nature or somethin. we all wanna be in the middle ground, not too much or to little. and Bea's strategy is genius! she knows exactly wut to do to avoid gettin all the cookies or nothin. it's all about findin that balance and stuff πŸͺπŸ’‘
 
omg I'm so down for a game of cookies with friends πŸͺπŸ‘« but I gotta say, Andy's strategy is kinda shady πŸ˜’ taking 4 cookies and leaving Bea to grab all the good ones? that's just not cool. Bea's move to take all the remaining cookies after Andy's share is pure genius πŸ‘ it shows she's thinking ahead and looking out for herself. and Celine, girl, you're like the ultimate wild card πŸ€” but seriously, who wouldn't want to play a game where no one wins or loses unfairly? 😊
 
omg, can u believe how strategic those 3 friends are? 🀯 they're all about avoiding extremes and playing it cool, like Bea's move is pure genius! 😎 i love how the puzzle shows us that even with simple rules, we need to think carefully about our moves. it's all about finding that balance and being fair to others. and cookies... who doesn't love cookies? πŸͺ❀️
 
You know what's kinda weird about this whole cookie game thing? It's actually kinda relatable πŸ€”. I mean, who hasn't wanted to avoid being on either end of the spectrum, right? But at the same time, it's a pretty simplistic problem and the solution is super straightforward... which makes me think that maybe humans aren't as crazy about finding balance and fairness as we thought 😏.

I'd love to see more complexity in this puzzle, you know, some unexpected twists and turns. But hey, I guess that's what makes real-life problems so much harder, right? The fact that Bea's move seems so clever is actually kinda underwhelming πŸ€·β€β™€οΈ. I mean, if I'm playing a game with friends, I want to feel like I'm making some kind of meaningful decision, not just following a predetermined plan.

Still, it's fun to think about how humans might behave in this situation... and maybe that's what the puzzle is really trying to say: we're all just trying to find our own sweet spot. πŸͺ
 
I'm so over these logic puzzles... like, who thought it was a good idea to play games with other people's feelings? I mean, if you're gonna be all about fairness and balance, just give everyone the same number of cookies already! Why make it so complicated? And what's up with Bea's move, she's basically just trying to avoid losing face. Meanwhile Andy is just chillin' taking 4 cookies like it's no big deal... I don't get why we're making a huge deal about this game πŸ™„
 
I gotta say, this cookie game logic thingy is kinda lame πŸ˜’. I mean, it's all about finding balance and whatnot, but at the end of the day, people are gonna do whatever they want to get ahead. Bea might think she's clever by grabbing 6 cookies and leaving Celine with none, but let's be real, if you're that desperate for cookies, you should've taken more in the first place πŸ€·β€β™€οΈ.

And what about Andy? Taking 4 cookies is a pretty weak move, just so he doesn't end up on either extreme. Can't he think outside the box (or cookie jar)? I bet Celine would've been better off taking all the cookies and being done with it 😏. This whole puzzle thingy just makes me wanna shake my head...
 
πŸͺπŸ€” I think it's kinda funny how Bea outsmarted everyone by taking all the remaining cookies. It makes sense that she wouldn't want to be left with the most or least number of cookies too... but also a bit sneaky 😏. Like, I get why Andy took 4 cookies, but what if he was worried about Bea taking more? And isn't it kinda weird that Celine just walked away with nothing? πŸ€‘
 
I think its kinda interesting how Andy and Bea figure out their strategy πŸ€”. Like, Bea's move is so smart because she tries to avoid being left with all the cookies, you know? It's like, she's thinking about Celine's feelings too 😊. And I feel like this puzzle shows us that balance is key, even in games or something. Its not always just about winning, but also about making sure everyone's happy πŸͺπŸ‘Œ
 
πŸͺ I think what's really interesting here is how people (Andy and Bea) rationalize their actions to avoid being on either extreme end of the cookie spectrum πŸ€”. It's almost like they're trying to find a middle ground that works for everyone, which is a pretty human-centric approach πŸ’‘. And you know what? I think this says a lot about our desire for balance and fairness in life 🌎. We want to be able to share resources, take turns, and work together without anyone feeling like they're at an unfair disadvantage 🀝. It's almost like we're wired to seek that sweet spot where everyone gets a little bit of everything 🍰.
 
Ugh I was so confused when I first read about this cookie game thingy 🀯. I mean, who takes 4 cookies? Seemed like too few for me, but maybe Andy just wanted to leave room for Bea to come back and get more cookies later 😏. And what's up with Celine just walking away? Did she really not want any cookies at all or was that just a clever move by Bea to distract everyone?

But I love how this puzzle shows us humans are wired to avoid extremes. It's like, we don't like it when things are too good or too bad - we need some balance in life 🀝. And Bea's strategy is so sneaky! She plays the game while also playing Celine and Andy at the same time πŸ€‘.

I'm just glad I'm not one of those people who gets really stressed out by puzzles like this πŸ˜…. I mean, can you imagine being a competitive person or something? But yeah, it's actually kind of cool to see how humans think when faced with rules and challenges... especially ones that have cookies πŸͺπŸ‘Œ
 
I'm still confused about how Bea knows Celine will be left with none if she grabs all the remaining cookies after Andy takes his 4. Wouldn't that mean Bea would end up with a bunch of cookies and be on one side of the spectrum? πŸ€”πŸͺ I feel like there's gotta be another way to look at it, but I'm not sure... πŸ‘€
 
😊 I think its kinda funny how people try to outsmart each other in games like this. Like, Bea's move is clever, but Andy would've been better off taking even more cookies and then giving some to Celine to make sure she doesn't end up with the most. That way everyone's still relatively happy πŸͺπŸ’•. But I guess thats not how its meant to be played, just like in real life where we all gotta find that middle ground 🀝.
 
πŸͺπŸ˜’ Andy: 4 cookies, Bea: 6? Celine's all like "I'm good, I'll just stay empty πŸ€·β€β™€οΈ #cookiesforCeline" πŸ˜‚πŸ‘€ Meanwhile, Bea got the most, but she still can't let it go... πŸ€” Why so serious? πŸͺπŸ’β€β™€οΈ
 
I think its kinda crazy how Andy's decision to take 4 cookies is actually the key to Bea and Celine's success 🀯. Like, if he took more, he'd be stuck on one side, and if he took less, Bea would just swoop in and steal all the remaining ones πŸ˜…. Its like he created a balance point for them to work from. And Bea's move is so clever too - she's always thinking about Celine's perspective, not just her own interests 🀝. This whole thing makes me wonder what other times we're making decisions based on trying to avoid extremes and find that sweet spot 😊.
 
πŸͺπŸ’” this game of cookies sounds like a nightmare for Celine πŸ€• she got screwed outta all the cookies! 4 and 6 is a pretty good combo but what if Andy & Bea were to switch it up? maybe just leave Celine with 2 cookies and keep the rest between them. that way no one gets left in the dust... or in this case, crumbs 🍞
 
Back
Top