How the Definition of 'Doxxing' Is Being Twisted Into a Weapon of Anonymity

The term "doxxing" has been hijacked, allowing politicians like Rep. Anna Paulina Luna to wield it as a weapon against journalists and whistleblowers. The definition of doxxing has been distorted to imply that simply identifying government officials or publishing their publicly available information is a crime.

Journalist Seth Harp was subpoenaed by the House Oversight Committee after he shared biographical information about a Delta Force commander, which was publicly available on a website. However, Rep. Luna accused him of "doxxing" and making a criminal referral to the Justice Department. Harp maintains that this is not doxxing, as he did not publish any personal or sensitive information.

The U.S. Department of Homeland Security has also become embroiled in the controversy, insisting that identifying ICE agents who are involved in high-profile incidents is an act of doxxing. This claim is dubious, especially when considering that the identities of government officials are typically public knowledge and that journalists have a right to report on their activities.

The issue highlights the need for clear definitions and boundaries around speech and reporting. When politicians like Rep. Luna misuse terms like "doxxing" to silence critics, it can lead to confusion and intimidation. Journalists and whistleblowers must be able to report on government actions without fear of retribution or harassment.

As one journalist noted, "The public has a right to know the names of the government officials who work for us... That is part of basic accountability in an open society governed by the rule of law." It's essential that we protect press freedom and the right to report on government actions without fear of reprisal.
 
I'm so tired of politicians trying to silence journalists with made-up words πŸ™„. Doxxing is already a real issue, but now Rep. Anna Paulina Luna is using it to intimidate people who speak out against her. It's ridiculous that she thinks sharing publicly available info about a government official is "doxxing" 🀯.

Newsflash: if you're a public figure, your name and face are already out there, so don't try to claim it as some kind of special right πŸ˜‚. Journalists have a job to do, which is to hold people in power accountable. If they share biographical info that's publicly available, that's not doxxing – that's just basic reporting πŸ“°.

The whole thing is about creating fear and intimidation. As one journalist said, the public has a right to know who their government officials are, because it's part of transparency and accountability πŸ’¬. Let's stick to the facts and protect press freedom from people like Rep. Luna trying to silence us πŸ”’.
 
It's so frustrating when ppl like Rep. Luna hijack terms like "doxxing" to silence journalists & whistleblowers πŸ€¬πŸ“°! Like, just 'cause u share public info don't make it a crime πŸ™…β€β™‚οΈ! We gotta have clear definitions & boundaries around speech & reporting, especially when it comes to gov officials 🚨. Journalists r doin their job by holdin' ppl in power accountable, & they shouldn't be intimidated or harassed for it πŸ’ͺ. The public's got a right 2 know who's workin' for the gov, and that's part of what makes our society work πŸ’Ό. We gotta protect press freedom & let journalists keep doin their thing without fear of reprisal πŸ“°πŸ’₯!
 
πŸ€” I think Rep Anna Paulina Luna is totally misusing this term "doxxing" πŸ™…β€β™‚οΈ She's basically trying to bully Seth Harp into shutting up about some public info... I mean, come on! If she knows the info is public and out there anyway, why should she be all upset? πŸ€·β€β™€οΈ It's like her trying to silence dissenting voices. We need clear definitions for what's acceptable and what's not, so journalists can do their job without being intimidated. πŸ“°πŸ’»
 
πŸ€” This whole doxxing thing has gotten super messy. Like, Rep. Anna Paulina Luna is literally using a term that's meant to protect people from online harassment against journalists and whistleblowers. It's wild how politicians can just hijack words and use them to silence others. πŸ™„ The fact that journalist Seth Harp got subpoenaed for sharing public info about a Delta Force commander is crazy. I mean, shouldn't we be able to report on government officials without fear of being sued or bullied? πŸ“° The DHS thing just adds fuel to the fire. If identifying ICE agents in high-profile incidents is doxxing, then what's next? Identifying corrupt cops and publishing it online? πŸš”

It's time for some clear definitions and boundaries around speech and reporting. Journalists and whistleblowers need protection from politicians who are trying to silence them. We can't have a free press if we're constantly looking over our shoulders. The public has the right to know what their government officials are doing, and that includes sharing their names. It's basic accountability in an open society. πŸ’¬
 
I'm really sick of politicians like Rep. Anna Paulina Luna trying to use "doxxing" to shut down honest journalists and whistleblowers 🀯. They're basically saying that anyone who dares to expose some government wrongdoing is a "villain", but in reality, they're just doing their job πŸ’Ό. I mean, come on, if the public wants to know about what's going on in our government, shouldn't we be able to trust the press to give us accurate info? πŸ“° It's like they're trying to rewrite the rules of free speech and make it impossible for anyone to hold those in power accountable πŸ’ͺ. We need to stand up for journalists and whistleblowers, not silence them with misleading terms that can lead to real-world consequences 😬.
 
Man, this doxxing thingy has gone totally outta control πŸ™„. I mean, I get it, politicians don't like being scrutinized, but come on! If you're a public figure, you shouldn't expect to be able to hide your identity. It's just basic transparency, you know? πŸ€·β€β™‚οΈ

I remember when I was young and my dad used to talk about the importance of investigative journalism. He'd say that journalists were like watchdogs, holding those in power accountable for their actions. And now, it seems like some politicians are trying to muzzle them with these doxxing allegations 🚫.

It's not just about Seth Harp sharing some info online; it's about the principle of transparency and accountability. Journalists have a right to report on what's going on in this country, even if it makes some people uncomfortable πŸ’₯. We need to protect press freedom and ensure that our journalists can do their jobs without fear of retribution or harassment πŸ“°.
 
πŸ“°πŸ‘Ž I'm so done with politicians like Rep Anna Paulina Luna using "doxxing" as a smear tactic against journalists and whistleblowers. Like, if it's publicly available info, it's not doxxing πŸ€·β€β™‚οΈ. We need clear definitions of what constitutes doxxing so we can protect press freedom and not be bullied by people who want to silence us πŸ—£οΈ.

I'm also frustrated that the DHS is getting in on this too πŸ™„. If government officials are public figures, shouldn't they expect to be held accountable for their actions? πŸ€” Journalists have a right to report on them without fear of reprisal πŸ“°πŸ’Ό.

It's crazy how fast language can get hijacked πŸ’₯ and used as a tool to control the narrative πŸ“Ί. We need to stand up against this kind of intimidation and protect our press freedom πŸ”’. The public has a right to know what their government officials are doing, and journalists have a duty to report on it πŸ‘Š.
 
πŸ€” I'm worried about what's happening with this "doxxing" term, it's like politicians are trying to control who can say what about them 😬. Journalists and whistleblowers need to be able to report on government stuff without fear of getting in trouble, that's kinda the point of a free press πŸ’Ό. I mean, if your info is public, why should you have to worry about sharing it? πŸ€·β€β™‚οΈ It's like they're trying to silence critics and make journalists walk on eggshells, which isn't right πŸ˜’. We need clearer definitions and boundaries around speech and reporting so that everyone can just do their job without fear of retribution πŸ‘Š.
 
omg I'm so worried about our press freedom πŸ“°πŸ˜Ÿ Rep Anna Paulina Luna is literally using doxxing as a tool to silence journalists and whistleblowers like Seth Harp πŸ€¦β€β™€οΈ he did nothing wrong just sharing public info on a website πŸ“Š it's crazy how DHS got involved too πŸ€” I mean who do they think they are trying to label ICE agents' identities as doxxing? 🚫 that's basic journalism right there πŸ‘ we need to stand up for Seth and other journalists who report the truth without fear πŸ“°πŸ’ͺ let's make some noise and demand clearer definitions around speech and reporting πŸ—£οΈπŸ‘
 
🀣 I mean, come on! Politicians using "doxxing" as a shield to silence journalists is like me trying to blame my cat for eating my laptop 😹. It's just not fair. And Rep. Luna thinking she can use her power to intimidate Seth Harp? That's just purr-fectly ridiculous πŸˆπŸ’β€β™€οΈ. The whole thing is like a bad joke - except instead of laughing, we should be throwing shade πŸ”₯. Seriously though, it's time for some clarity on what constitutes "doxxing" and when it crosses the line from legitimate reporting to harassment. Let's get real, folks! πŸ“°πŸ‘Š
 
"Freedom of the press is of no value if not used in the support of humanity with all its problems." πŸ“°πŸ’‘
The situation with doxxing highlights how politicians are misusing this term to stifle criticism and reporting, leaving journalists and whistleblowers vulnerable to intimidation.
Politicians like Rep. Luna should be held accountable for their actions rather than trying to silence others who dare to speak out against them.
 
Back
Top