Make films shorter if you want them shown in cinemas, says Picturehouse director

Cinemas Need Shorter Films to Survive, Says Leading Director

Industry insiders are sounding the alarm that the current trend of increasingly long films is putting pressure on cinemas. According to Clare Binns, the creative director of Picturehouse Cinemas and this year's recipient of the Bafta award for outstanding British contribution to cinema, directors need to ensure a comfortable viewing experience if they want their films shown in cinemas.

Recent blockbusters have shattered the three-hour mark, with Martin Scorsese's Killers of the Flower Moon clocking in at 206 minutes and Brady Corbet's The Brutalist stretching to 215 minutes. This trend has raised concerns about scheduling problems and the impact on cinema-goers.

Binns believes that shorter films are not just a practical solution but also essential for a successful cinematic experience. "I talk to producers about this and say: 'Tell the director you're making the film for an audience, not the directors,'" she explained. "There's always exceptions, but I look at a lot of films and think: 'You could take 20 minutes out of that.' There's no need for films to be that long."

The issue is twofold โ€“ cinemas are limited by extended runtimes, which restrict their programming options, while also impacting the viewing experience. "It means you only get one evening show," Binns pointed out. "I think it's a wake-up call to directors. If they want their films in cinemas, people have to feel comfortable about what they're committing to."

This is not an isolated issue. Industry consolidation and concerns over Netflix's bid to buy Warner Bros Discovery are also casting a shadow over the sector.

However, there are signs of renewed interest in cinemas, particularly among younger audiences. Repertory programming, which features classic films and lesser-known gems, is proving popular among young viewers who appreciate the unique experience of watching a movie on the big screen.

For Binns, originality and commitment from filmmakers are crucial for cinema's survival. "Anora, Hamnet, Marty Supreme were all original stories," she noted. "And when film-makers engage properly, doing Q&As and working with cinemas, audiences respond."

Binns has been a champion of independent filmmaking throughout her career, which spans over four decades. Her initiatives to embed cinemas in their local communities have also been successful, including partnerships with Brixton Soup Kitchen and Poetic Unity.

The Bafta award is a testament to Binns' dedication to the sector. "Local cinemas are fantastic resources," she said. "They get people out of their houses, they're community hubs. If that disappears, it's a tragedy."

As cinema operators work to maintain a competitive edge in an increasingly fragmented market, the issue of film length is set to remain a priority. Will directors heed Binns' advice and craft shorter, more engaging films? Only time will tell.
 
I think this is actually a good thing for cinemas - people get restless if they're sitting through something that's 3 hours long! Can you imagine watching a movie while your bladder is slowly dying over there? Not exactly the most comfortable experience.

And I love that Binns is saying that directors need to consider their audience, not just themselves. It's all about creating an experience for people, not just showcasing how clever you are as a filmmaker ๐ŸŽฅ

I also think this is a sign of things changing in the film industry - we're starting to see more repertory programming and classic films getting love again. There's something special about watching a movie on the big screen with a crowd of strangers who are all there for the same reason ๐Ÿ˜Š
 
I mean, can you imagine watching Killers of the Flower Moon or The Brutalist without getting bored outta your head ?? 2 hours and 20 minutes is like, way too long for a film, right?! ๐Ÿคฏ I think Clare Binns has a point, directors should try to make their films more engaging and not just pad 'em up with extra scenes. And what's up with Netflix buying Warner Bros Discovery? That's gonna have some big implications on the whole cinema industry ๐ŸŽฅ๐Ÿ“บ
 
I'm so done with these blockbuster movies that think they're above making the audience feel uncomfortable after 3 hours ๐Ÿคฏ๐Ÿฟ There's no need for all that drama, can't we just have a decent story with some breathing room? I mean, what's next, 4-hour Marvel movies? ๐Ÿ˜‚ Cinemas are already struggling to stay relevant, and this is just gonna make it harder. We need more original stories from filmmakers who actually care about their audience, not just trying to pad out the runtime ๐ŸŽฌ๐Ÿ‘Š
 
I'm thinking, cinemas need a breather from these super long movies ๐ŸŽฅ. Three hours is like watching a whole TV series, you know? People's attention spans are getting shorter, maybe it's time directors cut the fat ๐Ÿ’ธ. I mean, what's the point of making a 2 hour 15 minute film if people can't sit through the whole thing without falling asleep ๐Ÿ˜ด. And it's not just about the film itself, but also about the cinema experience ๐Ÿฟ. You gotta have some breathing room for other movies and events.
 
I'm all about seeing new movies on the big screen ๐Ÿฟ but honestly, 3+ hour films are just too long. I mean, I know some people love 'em, but for me, it's like paying extra to sit through a marathon. Can't we get back to decent length stories that don't feel like watching 2 other movies? I think cinemas would be way more popular if they showed shorter films ๐ŸŽฅ
 
yep, i totally agree with binns on this one... 2 hours is just too long for most people ๐Ÿ˜ด cinemas need a mix of blockbuster hits and some shorter, bite-sized flicks to keep ppl engaged ๐Ÿฟ the repertory thing is a great way to do that btw ๐Ÿ‘ cinemas are already struggling what with netflix etc so they can't afford to be stuck showing 3 hour+ films all day every day ๐Ÿ’ธ
 
It's crazy how long movies are nowadays ๐Ÿคฏ. I remember going to the cinema back in '02 when the longest movie was like 2 hours max ๐Ÿฟ. Now it's like you're committing an entire evening just to watch one film ๐Ÿ˜ด. I get that some stories need more time, but can't they be told without dragging on for ages? It's like watching paint dry...or listening to dad ramble on about his favourite football team ๐Ÿ˜….
 
๐Ÿค” cinemas have been trying to adapt to changing viewer habits for years now, but it's really about the filmmakers getting back to basics - what makes for a great story that keeps you engaged over 2 hours is still hard to beat. shorter films don't have to sacrifice depth or quality, just cut out some of the extraneous stuff and we're golden ๐Ÿ‘
 
can cinemas really be saved by just making movies 20 minutes shorter? i mean idk about that but if directors care less about their own ego's then maybe these flicks would actually work in the cinema ๐ŸŽฅ
 
The thing about watching a movie for 3 hours is just crazy ๐Ÿคฏ I mean, have you seen a film that's over 2 hours long? It feels like an event rather than a proper film experience. I've been to some cinemas where they show these ridiculously long movies and it's just meh... I'd rather catch a shorter one and then grab food or go outside. Anyway, directors should really consider making their films shorter because, let's be real, most people don't have that much time on the weekend ๐Ÿ•ฐ๏ธ
 
I mean, 3 hours is just too long for a movie, you know? It's like, people can only sit still for that much time without getting restless ๐Ÿคฏ. And I get it, the studios want to make epic stories and all, but directors have to think about the audience, right? Like, what if they just chopped 30 minutes off that last film they made? Would've been a totally different movie, and people would still be talking about it ๐Ÿ˜‚. Plus, cinemas are already struggling with limited showtimes... it's like, can't we find a happy medium here? ๐Ÿค”
 
I'm thinkin' that 3 hour films are just gettin' too long for cinemas ๐Ÿฟ๐Ÿ˜ด. I mean, who wants to sit through that kinda commitment? ๐Ÿ˜‚ They need to find a balance between storytellin' and keepin' people engaged. It's not about the film itself, but about the experience. And let's be real, sometimes you just wanna chill at home with Netflix ๐Ÿ“บ๐Ÿ‘. But cinemas can still thrive if they focus on original stories and engage with their audience. I'm all for repertory programming, it's a great way to mix things up and attract new fans ๐Ÿ‘
 
Back
Top