Minnesota's Governor Tim Walz and Minneapolis Mayor Jacob Frey are under fire from the US Justice Department, which is investigating them for allegedly conspiring to obstruct the Trump administration's immigration crackdown in the state. The probes appear to be part of a broader pattern of using federal power to target Democratic leaders who have spoken out against the administration's policies.
The investigation has already issued subpoenas for both Walz and Frey, with plans to serve them soon. Walz, who was also the Democratic nominee for vice-president in 2024, condemned the move as an "authoritarian tactic." He accused the Trump administration of using its power to intimidate opponents, citing examples of investigations into sitting senators Elissa Slotkin and Mark Kelly.
Frey, meanwhile, vowed not to be intimidated by the investigation. In a statement, he called it an "obvious attempt" to silence him for speaking out against the chaos and danger caused by the Trump administration's immigration policies in Minneapolis.
The investigation comes as tensions over immigration enforcement remain high in Minnesota. The state has been a focal point of resistance to the Trump administration's crackdown, with protests sparked by the shooting of Renee Good by an ICE officer last week. Homeland security has deployed thousands of immigration officers to the state, which has raised concerns about civil liberties and police accountability.
The Justice Department's actions have drawn criticism from Democrats and civil rights groups, who see them as part of a broader pattern of using federal power to silence opposition voices. The probes also raise questions about the role of politics in law enforcement, with some experts warning that investigations aimed at intimidating Democratic leaders can undermine public trust in the justice system.
As the investigation unfolds, it remains to be seen how it will play out and whether it will have any impact on Walz and Frey's efforts to lead their state. One thing is clear: the move has sparked a heated debate about the limits of federal power, the role of politics in law enforcement, and the importance of protecting civil liberties in the face of partisan pressure.
The investigation has already issued subpoenas for both Walz and Frey, with plans to serve them soon. Walz, who was also the Democratic nominee for vice-president in 2024, condemned the move as an "authoritarian tactic." He accused the Trump administration of using its power to intimidate opponents, citing examples of investigations into sitting senators Elissa Slotkin and Mark Kelly.
Frey, meanwhile, vowed not to be intimidated by the investigation. In a statement, he called it an "obvious attempt" to silence him for speaking out against the chaos and danger caused by the Trump administration's immigration policies in Minneapolis.
The investigation comes as tensions over immigration enforcement remain high in Minnesota. The state has been a focal point of resistance to the Trump administration's crackdown, with protests sparked by the shooting of Renee Good by an ICE officer last week. Homeland security has deployed thousands of immigration officers to the state, which has raised concerns about civil liberties and police accountability.
The Justice Department's actions have drawn criticism from Democrats and civil rights groups, who see them as part of a broader pattern of using federal power to silence opposition voices. The probes also raise questions about the role of politics in law enforcement, with some experts warning that investigations aimed at intimidating Democratic leaders can undermine public trust in the justice system.
As the investigation unfolds, it remains to be seen how it will play out and whether it will have any impact on Walz and Frey's efforts to lead their state. One thing is clear: the move has sparked a heated debate about the limits of federal power, the role of politics in law enforcement, and the importance of protecting civil liberties in the face of partisan pressure.