Mountain View officials allege federal, state agencies accessed Flock camera data without consent

Mountain View officials are sounding the alarm over alleged data breaches involving its Flock camera system, which is a license plate reader camera that captures images of vehicles passing by.

According to city insiders, multiple federal agencies, including those from the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives in Kentucky and Tennessee, as well as Langley Air Force Base in Virginia and Lake Mead National Recreation Area in Nevada, accessed data from the Flock camera located at San Antonio Road and Charleston Road without the city's explicit consent.

The problem began when an internal audit discovered that a nationwide search setting had been enabled on the system by Flock Safety, which was not approved by the Mountain View Police Department. This allowed California law enforcement agencies to access the data from 29 of the city's 30 Flock cameras, which was also unauthorized.

"This is a system failure on Flock Safety's part," said the city in a statement, highlighting that the setting had been turned on without permission or knowledge.

Critics argue that this breach highlights the need for stricter safeguards to protect personal data. "There is just no such thing as enough safeguards," said Cat Brooks, with the Anti Police-Terror Project. "They have the technology to get into what they want, when they want, and how they want it. That's just what's true."

The city of Mountain View has since changed the camera settings to prevent future unauthorized access.

As concerns surrounding surveillance and data protection continue to grow, experts warn that simply fixing technical glitches is not enough to ensure public trust in these systems.
 
๐Ÿคฆโ€โ™‚๏ธ I mean, can you believe it? These camera thingies are literally spying on people's every move... and now we're finding out that even the feds were snooping around without permission! ๐Ÿ˜ฑ Like, what's next? They gonna install cameras in everyone's homes too?! ๐Ÿ“บ It's crazy how these tech companies think they can just do whatever they want with our personal data without anyone questioning it. I mean, Flock Safety should've done a better job securing those cameras, you feel me? ๐Ÿค”

But for real, though... this is some wild stuff. And yeah, the experts are right - just fixing technical issues isn't gonna cut it when it comes to building trust with these systems. We need way more transparency and accountability, stat! ๐Ÿ’ป๐Ÿ‘ฎโ€โ™€๏ธ
 
๐Ÿ˜ฌ This is so messed up! I mean, can you even imagine having your license plate info shared without your consent? ๐Ÿคฏ It's like they're playing with fire when it comes to personal data and surveillance. I'm all for keeping our streets safe, but we gotta do it responsibly. The city should be doing more to educate people on how their data is being used and protect them from these kinds of breaches.

And what really gets me is that there are still no real safeguards in place when it comes to preventing this kind of thing from happening again. Like, Cat Brooks said it best - "There is just no such thing as enough safeguards". ๐Ÿคฆโ€โ™€๏ธ We need to be holding our cities and companies accountable for protecting our personal info.

The city of Mountain View might have changed the camera settings, but this is just a drop in the bucket. We need systemic changes to prevent these kinds of breaches from happening again. ๐Ÿ’ก
 
omg ๐Ÿ™…โ€โ™‚๏ธ like seriously can't even... so Flock Safety just enabled a nationwide search setting on their camera system without Mountain View Police even knowing? and now CA law enforcement agencies are scooping up all that personal data from 29 of the city's cameras? ๐Ÿšจ this is a huge fail, gotta be some major security oversight. and yeah, Cat Brooks is totally right - we need way more safeguards in place to protect our data, not just bandaids like changing camera settings ๐Ÿ’ป๐Ÿ”’
 
๐Ÿค” I'm really worried about this Flock camera system thing... like seriously how can a company just enable a nationwide search setting on their own? ๐Ÿšจ It's so scary to think that all those cameras are capturing images of our vehicles and that data is being accessed by all these agencies without our consent. ๐Ÿ’ป I know the city had no idea about it, but still it's a huge security breach. ๐Ÿคฆโ€โ™€๏ธ And Cat Brooks is totally right, we need way more safeguards in place to protect our personal info. It's not just about fixing technical issues, it's about having policies and laws that actually prevent this kind of thing from happening again. ๐Ÿ’ช
 
๐Ÿคฆโ€โ™‚๏ธ this is getting crazy! I mean, who enables a nationwide search setting on their camera system without even telling the police department? It's like they're just begging for hackers or bad guys to exploit it. And now we're seeing all sorts of agencies accessing our data without consent... it's just not right.

I know that tech companies are just trying to make a living and provide useful tools, but come on! Can't they see how their actions can affect people's lives? It's like they're playing a game of " surveillance roulette" where innocent people get caught in the middle. We need better safeguards in place, for sure.
 
๐Ÿค” so like what's up with Flock Safety right? They're a company that makes cameras for cities but they didn't even get permission from Mountain View to use them as a tool for law enforcement... and now California cops are accessing data without consent? That's some major red flag ๐Ÿšจ. I'm not surprised that experts say this breach highlights the need for better safeguards, like cat says it's about time we had stricter rules in place to protect our personal info ๐Ÿคฆโ€โ™€๏ธ. It's all about trust and transparency when it comes to surveillance systems... can't just fix a technical glitch without addressing the root issue ๐Ÿ’ป
 
๐Ÿšจ this is so sketchy ๐Ÿค”... like, who needs that much info on everyone's plates? ๐Ÿ“ธ it's crazy that some govt agencies just waltzed in and got access to all that personal data without the city's explicit consent ๐Ÿ™„ and now they're just changing the settings ๐Ÿคทโ€โ™€๏ธ like that's gonna fix everything? ๐Ÿ’ฏ we need way more transparency & accountability on these systems ๐Ÿ‘€
 
omg u no how frustrating this is... i had no idea they were using these cameras for so many federal agencies ๐Ÿคฏ like whats the point of even having them if people r just gonna access the data without permission? ๐Ÿšซ and cat brooks says its not about technical glitches, its about having enough safeguards in place. i feel like we need to rethink our whole approach to surveillance and prioritize public trust over convenience for corporations... this is a major wake-up call for me ๐Ÿ™
 
๐Ÿค” so like this is a big deal or what?! I mean i thought we had laws against govt agencies accessing each other's data but apparently they just wanna play by their own rules ๐Ÿ™„ and now mountain view is all like "hey we're changing the settings to prevent future breaches" but really we should be asking why did flock safety even enable that search setting in the first place? ๐Ÿคทโ€โ™€๏ธ shouldn't they have at least gotten permission from mpd before doing that?

and cat brooks makes a valid point, i guess ๐Ÿ™ data protection is like super important and we need to make sure there are strict safeguards in place so this stuff doesn't happen again. but at the same time, it's not just about tech glitches... it's about how power dynamics play out between different agencies and whether they're being transparent with each other. ๐Ÿค maybe we need a whole new set of laws around surveillance and data sharing? idk
 
Ugh, this Flock camera thing is giving me major dรฉjร  vu ๐Ÿค”... remember those old DMV cameras back in the day? You know, the ones that just had a bunch of black and white photos of cars driving by? Yeah, that was basically what this feels like โ€“ more technology, same creepy vibe. I mean, I get it, safety is important, but can't they just find better ways to do it without invading our personal space? ๐Ÿคทโ€โ™€๏ธ It's like, we know you're trying to keep us safe, but honestly, I'd rather see some real transparency about what data they're collecting and how it's being used. This whole thing just feels like a big mess, you know? ๐Ÿ’” And now the city is changing the camera settings... I'm guessing that's not gonna be enough, right? ๐Ÿคฆโ€โ™‚๏ธ
 
๐Ÿค” The recent revelation about the alleged data breaches involving Flock camera system in Mountain View raises significant concerns about the handling of sensitive information by law enforcement agencies ๐Ÿšจ. It appears that a nationwide search setting was enabled without explicit consent from the city, allowing unauthorized access to California law enforcement agencies ๐Ÿ“Š. This highlights the need for more stringent safeguards to protect personal data, as Cat Brooks aptly pointed out ๐Ÿ”’. While changing the camera settings is a step in the right direction, it's not enough to restore public trust in these systems ๐Ÿ’”. We need more comprehensive solutions that prioritize transparency and accountability ๐Ÿ‘ฎโ€โ™‚๏ธ๐Ÿ’ป
 
This is getting weirder by the day, you guys ๐Ÿคฏ I mean, I knew those license plate readers were creepy, but this takes it to a whole new level! Who does Flock Safety think they are, enabling that nationwide search setting without even consulting Mountain View Police? It's like they're trying to create a backdoor for some shadowy agency... or maybe it's just a coincidence ๐Ÿค”.

And don't even get me started on Cat Brooks' comment. I mean, isn't she with the Anti Police-Terror Project? Sounds like she might have an agenda of her own here ๐Ÿค‘. I'm not saying there's anything fishy going on, but... what if some of those agencies didn't access that data by mistake? What if it was a test run for something bigger? ๐Ÿคฏ The more I think about it, the more I want to know...
 
I'm getting majorly creeped out by this Flock camera system ๐Ÿคฏ๐Ÿšซ! Like, I get it, safety first and all that, but do we really need our cities being monitored like that? The fact that multiple federal agencies were accessing our data without explicit consent is straight-up wrong ๐Ÿ™…โ€โ™‚๏ธ. It's all about trust and transparency when it comes to surveillance systems - we need way more accountability, not just fixing technical issues ๐Ÿ’ป๐Ÿ’ธ! #JusticeForPrivacy #DataProtectionMatters #SurveillanceState
 
๐Ÿค” This whole thing is super concerning but I guess it's also a wake-up call for Mountain View to review their security protocols ๐Ÿšจ๐Ÿ’ป I mean, who needs more excuses to improve data protection measures? ๐Ÿคทโ€โ™€๏ธ It's not like they were doing everything right in the first place ๐Ÿ˜…. And let's be real, with all these agencies accessing this camera system, it's just another reason to question the whole purpose of license plate readers in the first place ๐Ÿš—๐Ÿ‘€ I guess what I'm saying is, better late than never, and now Mountain View has a chance to prove they're taking data protection seriously ๐Ÿ’ฏ
 
๐Ÿšจ๐Ÿ’ก I think it's wild how one misconfig on Flock Safety's part turned into this whole mess ๐Ÿคฏ. Like, I get it, they're trying to help with law enforcement and all, but at what cost? The fact that multiple agencies were able to access data without consent is just shady ๐Ÿ˜’. It highlights the need for better security measures, like we know ๐Ÿ‘€. Can't have our public cameras being used as a big ol' surveillance tool ๐Ÿค–. What's next, having every single camera on the street watching our every move? No thanks ๐Ÿšซ. We need to be more careful with how we tech out and make sure it's for good, not just convenience ๐Ÿ•ต๏ธโ€โ™€๏ธ.
 
omg ๐Ÿคฏ๐Ÿšจ i'm like totally worried about this ๐Ÿ˜Ÿ! think about it... cameras everywhere watching what we do ๐Ÿ“บ๐Ÿ‘€ and our data getting shared without consent ๐Ÿค” no thanks ๐Ÿ™…โ€โ™€๏ธ! cat brooks is right ๐Ÿ™Œ stricter safeguards need to be in place ๐Ÿ’ฏ so we can feel safe online & offline ๐Ÿ•ต๏ธโ€โ™€๏ธ this is not just about Mountain View ๐Ÿ“ it's a bigger issue globally ๐ŸŒŽ what's being done to protect our data ๐Ÿค? more needs to be done ๐Ÿš€๐Ÿ’ป
 
๐Ÿ˜ฌ u guys know how many cameras are already installed on our streets nowadays? ๐Ÿคฏ it's crazy! but what really worries me is when those cameras get hacked or accessed without consent... it's like, personal data is being exploited for all the wrong reasons ๐Ÿ’”. we need to be super vigilant about who has access to this info and how they're using it ๐Ÿšซ. cat brooks hit the nail on the head - we can't rely just on tech fixes, we need real safeguards in place ๐Ÿ”’. anyway, i'm glad mountain view is taking steps to secure their cameras ๐Ÿ‘. gotta stay vigilant, you know? ๐Ÿค”
 
Back
Top