Documents from the Trump Administration Suggest Rubio Targeted Students for Op-Eds, Protests
Internal Department of Homeland Security and State Department documents obtained by five students and academics as part of a lawsuit against President Donald Trump and Immigration and Customs Enforcement reveal a discrepancy in Secretary of State Marco Rubio's reasoning for attempting to deport them.
While Rubio claimed in public that the students were being targeted because they supported terrorism, internal documents suggest that their advocacy for Palestinian rights in protests and writings was actually the primary basis for the deportation orders. The Department of Homeland Security memo noted that there was no evidence that the students had provided material support to any terrorist organization, a claim often conflated with pro-Palestinian speech.
The State Department memos recommended deporting the five students due to their participation in on-campus protests and advocacy, citing the need to create a "hostile environment for Jewish students in the United States" and undermine U.S. policy to combat anti-Semitism worldwide. However, these actions were allegedly protected under the First Amendment.
One of the students, Rumeysa รztรผrk, had her visa revoked due to her involvement in associations that may have undermined US foreign policy by creating a hostile environment for Jewish students. Her op-ed piece was linked to an organization later banned from campus, which has sparked concerns about Rubio's actions.
The Intercept has obtained a trove of documents detailing the State Department and DHS efforts to target students speaking out on Palestinian issues, raising questions about Rubio's role in this process and his handling of sensitive national security information.
Internal Department of Homeland Security and State Department documents obtained by five students and academics as part of a lawsuit against President Donald Trump and Immigration and Customs Enforcement reveal a discrepancy in Secretary of State Marco Rubio's reasoning for attempting to deport them.
While Rubio claimed in public that the students were being targeted because they supported terrorism, internal documents suggest that their advocacy for Palestinian rights in protests and writings was actually the primary basis for the deportation orders. The Department of Homeland Security memo noted that there was no evidence that the students had provided material support to any terrorist organization, a claim often conflated with pro-Palestinian speech.
The State Department memos recommended deporting the five students due to their participation in on-campus protests and advocacy, citing the need to create a "hostile environment for Jewish students in the United States" and undermine U.S. policy to combat anti-Semitism worldwide. However, these actions were allegedly protected under the First Amendment.
One of the students, Rumeysa รztรผrk, had her visa revoked due to her involvement in associations that may have undermined US foreign policy by creating a hostile environment for Jewish students. Her op-ed piece was linked to an organization later banned from campus, which has sparked concerns about Rubio's actions.
The Intercept has obtained a trove of documents detailing the State Department and DHS efforts to target students speaking out on Palestinian issues, raising questions about Rubio's role in this process and his handling of sensitive national security information.