Over-reliance on China could hit UK energy supply chains 'putting 90,000 jobs at risk'

UK's Reliance on China for Energy Supplies Could Leave 90,000 Jobs at Risk

The UK's over-reliance on Chinese supply chains for its clean energy technologies could have disastrous consequences, warn experts. A disruption to the supply of essential battery components used in electric vehicles could lead to the loss of production of over 580,000 cars and put 90,000 jobs at risk.

According to a report by the Institute for Public Policy Research (IPPR), if the UK's clean energy supply chains are hit by a shock, it could delay the rollout of solar farms and put the country's clean energy goals in jeopardy. The thinktank estimates that this would cost the economy an extra Β£1.5 billion a year.

The IPPR report highlights the risks associated with relying too heavily on China for critical minerals such as refining. The report states that "eighty to ninety per cent of global refining for critical minerals is controlled by China", making the UK and its allies vulnerable to geopolitical and economic shocks.

The report calls on the government to pursue a policy of "securonomics" through greater international investment and partnership. The thinktank's senior research fellow, Pranesh Narayanan, warns that the world's over-reliance on China exacerbates these risks.

"The UK is a small open trading nation sailing through an international economy whose waters are getting choppier by the day," he said. "Donald Trump's trade war with China, the rise of conflicts around the world – these shocks ultimately hurt the UK economy because we rely so much on trade to source the essentials, including clean energy technologies."

Experts predict that China will continue to gain global market share in the coming years, despite Beijing's efforts to address imbalances in its economy. The country reported a record trillion-dollar global trade surplus last year, which has raised concerns among Western nations.

However, there are signs that China is beginning to temper its industrial exports to address these imbalances. Lynn Song, chief economist for Greater China at ING, notes that Beijing is focusing on promoting domestic demand as the future growth engine.

The IPPR recommends that the government should clarify its position on Chinese investment and involvement in the UK's clean energy supply chains, invest more in domestic production of batteries and green steel, and work with allies to invest in international stockpiles of solar, battery, and critical minerals.
 
πŸ€” 90k jobs at risk just because of our energy reliance on China? 🚨 That's a big problem. We need to diversify our supply chains ASAP! πŸ”— Here's a simple mind map to visualize the issue:
```
+---------------+
| UK |
+---------------+
/ \
+-----+ +-----+
| | | |
China | | US | |
| | | |
+-----+ +-----+ +-----+
| | | |
| Solar | Battery | Green |
| Farms | Techs | Steel |
| | | |
+-----+ +-----+ +-----+

```
We need to invest in domestic production and work with allies on international stockpiles. It's not just about jobs, it's also about energy security πŸŒŽπŸ’‘
 
I think it's crazy that 90k jobs are at risk 🀯... I mean, can you imagine having to tell people they lost their jobs because of some global supply chain issue? πŸ€• It's like, the UK is all about being clean and green now, but what if China screws everything up? 😩 It's not just about the economy either, it's about our future... do we really want to be reliant on one country for so much stuff? πŸ€”
 
I'm reading this news about the UK's reliance on China for energy supplies and I have to say it gives me some major chill vibes πŸ˜…. Like, 90k jobs at risk over a supply chain hiccup? That's a lot of people who could lose their jobs because of something that's outside of our control. And yeah, I get that we need to invest in clean energy technologies and all that, but can't we do it without putting ourselves so far out on a limb with China?

It seems like we're playing this game of "let's just rely on trade to make everything work" and it's gonna come back to bite us. Like, what happens if there's another Donald Trump-style trade war or something? Or if China decides to pull its punches in the global market? It's not like we can control all of these things, but at the same time, shouldn't we be trying to diversify our energy sources and create more stability?

I'm totally down for securonomics, though 🀝. Investing in international stockpiles and domestic production is a solid move. And I love that Lynn Song is talking about China promoting domestic demand – maybe that's the key to making their economy less volatile? Who knows, maybe we can learn from each other and find some common ground instead of just relying on trade 🀞.
 
thinkin about this news makes me wonder, how much do we rely on others for our survival? like the UK's reliance on China, it's scary thinkin that a disruption could put 90k jobs at risk 🀯. it's a good reminder to diversify and invest in ourselves, you know? can't just put all our eggs in one basket, gotta spread 'em out πŸ₯š. and yeah, the gov should be lookin into this, like, securonomics and all that πŸ“ˆ. but on a personal level, it's a good lesson to take control of what we can, rather than waitin for others to step up πŸ’ͺ.
 
omg 🀯 china's grip on the uk's clean energy tech is getting tighter 😬 580k cars on hold πŸš— 90k jobs at risk πŸ’Έ it's time for the gov to diversify its supply chains 🌎 invest in domestic production of batteries and green steel πŸ› οΈ let's not be held hostage by china's trade 🀝
 
<3 90k jobs at risk πŸ€―πŸ’” just because we're too dependent on China for our energy needs. We gotta diversify ASAP! ⚑️🌎 thinktank says it now: we need "securonomics" - investment in international partnerships and domestic production. πŸ“ˆπŸ‘₯ lets get the UK's clean energy supply chains secure! πŸ’ͺπŸ’Ό

here's a simple flowchart to visualize the problem:

```
+---------------+
| UK's Clean |
| Energy Needs |
+---------------+
|
|
v
+---------------+
| China's |
| Dominant Role |
+---------------+
|
|
v
+---------------+
| Vulnerability |
| to Geopolitical|
| & Economic Shocks|
+---------------+

```

we need to draw a parallel line here, to indicate the UK's growing independence from China:

```
+---------------+ +---------------+
| UK's Clean | | Domestic |
| Energy Needs | | Production |
+---------------+ +---------------+
| |
| |
v v
+---------------+ +---------------+
| Secured Supply| | Invest in |
| Chains | | International|
| | | Partnerships |
+---------------+ +---------------+

```

time to act! πŸ’ͺ🌟
 
😬 I mean, 90,000 jobs at risk from our reliance on China for clean energy tech? That's crazy talk! 🀯 I've got a chart that shows the UK's trade deficit with China has been increasing steadily since 2018... [insert chart of UK-China trade deficit] ...and it's not just about jobs, it's also about national security. 🚨 We can't afford to put our eggs in one basket when it comes to critical minerals like refining. The IPPR report makes some solid points, though - we do need to diversify our supply chains and invest more in domestic production. πŸ“ˆ I've got a graph that shows the growth of green steel production in the UK since 2020... [insert graph] ...and it's only going to get bigger! πŸ’ͺ
 
πŸ€” this reliance on china is crazy man, like we're not even thinking about our own future anymore. 90k jobs at risk? That's just devastating. i mean, we've been warned about this for ages, but it seems like the gov's not doing much about it. πŸ™„ what's the point of having a clean energy policy if we're just gonna rely on china to make our batteries and stuff? let's get our own act together and stop relying on foreign suppliers! πŸ’ͺ
 
You know I'm a sucker for old-school tech πŸš€πŸ’», but this UK-China energy thing is like a double-edged sword 🀯. On one hand, I get it, China's got some serious game when it comes to clean energy innovations πŸ’‘. But on the other hand, relying too heavily on them could be disastrous πŸ”₯. I mean, 90k jobs at risk? That's a lot of people losing their bread and butter 🍞.

And don't even get me started on the whole "securonomics" thing πŸ€”. I love the idea of diversifying our trade partnerships, but it feels like we're just throwing spaghetti at the wall to see what sticks 🍝. We need a more cohesive plan to reduce our reliance on China and invest in our own domestic production πŸ’ͺ.

Still, I've gotta give credit where credit is due – China's making some serious moves to rebalance their economy πŸ’Έ. Maybe we should be having a conversation with them instead of just warning about the risks πŸ“£? Either way, it's time for us to get real about our energy future and stop playing musical chairs with supply chains πŸ•Ί.
 
Back
Top