Tennessee university reinstates professor fired for post criticizing Charlie Kirk

A Tennessee University Reinstates Professor Fired for Criticizing Conservative Activist Charlie Kirk

In a move aimed at rectifying a highly publicized controversy, Austin Peay State University has reinstated a professor who was let go after making a post criticizing the fatal shooting of conservative activist Charlie Kirk. The university is also providing the teacher with $500,000 in settlement funds.

The tenured faculty member, Darren Michael, was among academics facing backlash for their online posts about Kirk's death in September. He was eventually moved to suspension status before being reinstated earlier this month as a result of a settlement between the university and Michael.

Tennessee Governor, Attorney General, and Comptroller signed a document authorizing the $500,000 payment, which also includes reimbursement of counseling costs. The university president acknowledged that the school did not follow the proper tenure termination process and expressed regret over the impact on Professor Michael and the campus community.

The controversy began when Republican Senator Marsha Blackburn tagged Austin Peay State University in a social media post featuring a screenshot of one of Michael's earlier posts, which criticized Charlie Kirk. The university faced criticism for its handling of the situation and the pressure applied by outside forces.

Professor Michael's lawyer stated that his client had made no threatening or offensive comments, and described the ordeal as causing significant harm to both Michael and his daughter.
 
πŸ€” This whole thing is super wild! Like, what's going on with people getting fired for expressing their opinions online? I mean, I get it, some stuff can be taken out of context, but in this case, Professor Michael was just stating the facts about Charlie Kirk's death. The fact that the university didn't follow proper procedures and had to shell out half a million bucks in settlement funds is just crazy πŸ€‘. It's like, isn't academic freedom supposed to protect people from getting fired for their ideas? And what's up with Senator Marsha Blackburn tagging the university in her social media post - wasn't that just trying to put pressure on them? πŸ˜’ Anyway, I guess this whole thing has made me think about the importance of free speech and how it can be easily twisted or manipulated. It's like, we need to be careful not to jump to conclusions or assume the worst about people online πŸ€·β€β™€οΈ.
 
πŸ€” I'm not surprised to see a professor get fired over speaking their mind online. As someone who's lived long enough to see the rise of the internet, I've seen how one misstep can be magnified. The problem is that we're living in a time where outrage is so easily sparked and amplified that it can lead to all sorts of unintended consequences.

In this case, the university initially handled things poorly, which just made things worse. But at least they're taking responsibility for their actions now and making amends. $500k is a pretty significant settlement, but I wonder if it's enough to make up for the harm that Professor Michael went through. πŸ€‘
 
OMG 🀯 just heard about this πŸ“š university reinstating a professor who got fired for talking trash πŸ’β€β™€οΈ about Charlie Kirk πŸ™…β€β™‚οΈ. I'm so done with people taking sides 🀝 on these kinda issues, can't we just respect ppl's opinions? πŸ€·β€β™‚οΈ The fact that the prof was movin' to suspension 1st before gettin' reinstated is wild πŸ’₯, like what even happened in between? πŸ€” The university's all like "oops" πŸ™ˆ and givin' him $500k πŸ€‘, which is pretty generous if u ask me πŸ’Έ. Guess it just shows that having a conscience & bein' accountable matters πŸ™.
 
I'm concerned about this whole thing πŸ€”. So, a professor gets fired for speaking his mind online, but then gets reinstated with a big settlement payment πŸ’Έ. It's like the university is trying to avoid taking responsibility for its own mistakes πŸ€¦β€β™‚οΈ.

The fact that it took a lawsuit and outside pressure from politicians to get Professor Michael reinstated raises questions about the university's handling of the situation πŸ‘€. I'm not sure if the governor, attorney general, and comptroller were just doing their job or trying to score some political points 🀝.

It's also interesting to note that the professor in question was a tenured faculty member, which means he has strong protections against unfair termination πŸ’ͺ. You'd think that would make things more difficult for the university to fire him without cause πŸ”’.

Overall, I think this whole thing is a bit of a mess πŸ“‰. It's like the university and the politicians are trying to navigate around doing what's right, instead of facing the issues head-on πŸ’¬.
 
I'm so confused about this whole thing πŸ€”... like, how can a university fire someone over something they said online? isn't that kinda like, freedom of speech or something? πŸ€·β€β™‚οΈ I mean, I get why the professor's comment might have been hurtful to some people, but shouldn't we be able to disagree without losing our jobs? πŸ€¦β€β™€οΈ

And what's up with the pressure from outside forces? like, didn't the university do their own thing and then just give in to whoever was complaining? πŸ˜’ And $500k in settlement funds is a lot of money... did the university really think this was worth it? πŸ’Έ
 
I think this whole thing is a super important lesson about free speech vs fear of backlash πŸ€”. It's wild that the university got dragged into it by someone else's tweet and then had to go through all this drama to set things right 🚫. But, I guess you could say the university learned a valuable lesson - just because someone makes a comment online doesn't mean they deserve to lose their job πŸ’Ό. It's also crazy that the settlement includes counseling costs for Professor Michael and his daughter... it's like we're treating people more like business assets than human beings with feelings πŸ€•. Anyway, I think this whole situation is a reminder that we gotta be careful about who we let decide what gets said on our behalf (and who doesn't) πŸ‘€.
 
omg can't believe what's going on at this uni they're so slow to the party but I guess it's about time πŸ€¦β€β™‚οΈ Austin Peay State is finally taking responsibility for their actions, $500k is a nice chunk of change too πŸ’Έ and good for Darren Michael he didn't deserve that kinda treatment from the gov. officials like Marsha Blackburn just thinking they can bully people online and get away with it? no way 🚫 gotta respect Professor Michael for speaking out even if it was about Charlie Kirk's passing - all in all, better late than never πŸ‘
 
I'm so done with this whole thing πŸ™„. Like, who gets fired for speaking their mind? Professor Michael was just expressing his opinion (which btw is a fundamental right) and now he's getting $500k for being silenced? That's messed up! πŸ€‘. I get that the university apologized and all, but it's too little, too late. The damage has been done.

And can we talk about this whole "outside forces" thing? Like, what even is that? Are they saying that the gov or the senator just decided to swoop in and ruin someone's life because they disagreed with their views? It's not right. We need to stand up for people who are brave enough to speak out against injustice (or whatever Charlie Kirk was). It's time we stopped letting fear of backlash silence us πŸ’β€β™€οΈ.

And btw, what's with the "conservative activist" label? Does that even mean anything anymore? Is it just a way to stifle dissenting voices and label them as "problematic"? Newsflash: criticism is not hate speech! 🀯. We need more professors like Professor Michael, speaking truth to power, not less πŸ˜’.
 
I'm so relieved that Austin Peay State University has finally made the right call and reinstated Professor Darren Michael πŸ™Œ. I mean, come on, who tries to fire someone for speaking their mind online? It's just not cool. The fact that they're providing him with $500k in settlement funds is also super generous πŸ€‘. I'm glad the governor, attorney general, and comptroller came together to make this happen - it shows they value fairness and due process. But seriously, universities are supposed to be safe spaces for academics to share their thoughts without fear of retribution. This whole ordeal was just a mess, and I hope Professor Michael can finally get some peace of mind πŸ™.
 
I'm still trying to wrap my head around this whole thing 🀯... like, what happened to this professor? He just makes a comment on social media about Charlie Kirk's death and suddenly he's being bullied by the university and even Senator Blackburn. It's wild how that one tweet can snowball into all this drama πŸ“£. I don't get why the university couldn't just take it as a comment from a professor who's expressing his opinion, you know? Instead of firing him and then trying to make amends with a huge settlement... just seems kinda unnecessary πŸ’Έ. And what really gets me is that Professor Michael has to pay for counseling costs too πŸ€•. Like, shouldn't the university be taking care of its employees' mental health in the first place? It's all just a bit too much drama for my liking 😩
 
man i'm so glad they're making things right at this university πŸ™πŸ’• it's crazy how one post can cause so much drama but i guess it just goes to show that we gotta be careful with what we share online, even if we think we're just expressing our opinions πŸ’»πŸ€” but seriously $500k is a lot of $$ and hopefully professor michael will be able to use that to take care of his family and move forward from this experience πŸ€žπŸ‘
 
This is wild 🀯... I mean, who expects a university to reinstate someone just 'cause of online comments? Like, isn't the whole point of being fired for making those comments that they're supposed to be a problem? But I guess that's not how it went down here. The thing is, it feels like the university was kinda pressured into doing this by external forces... I mean, Senator Marsha Blackburn tagging them in a social media post and all that jazz πŸ“°.

And now the prof is getting $500k to boot... which is crazy πŸ’Έ, but also kinda justified given what happened. The fact that the university didn't follow proper protocol and it affected the prof's mental health (his daughter was even affected) makes this whole thing super problematic πŸ€•. It's like they're trying to say "we made a mistake" without actually acknowledging the root of the problem...
 
🀯 this is insane! who gets fired for saying something critical about someone? like, i get it charlie kirk has a lot of followers but does that mean ppl should lose their jobs? $500k is a lot of cash tho, hopefully prof michael can finally focus on his work and not be haunted by this drama πŸ€―πŸ‘Ž
 
🀯 I'm still trying to process what happened at Austin Peay State University πŸ€”. It seems like they finally listened to their faculty member's concerns about Charlie Kirk's death πŸ˜•. I mean, who wouldn't be upset after reading some of those posts? The whole thing felt like a big ol' mess πŸŒͺ️.

I think it's awesome that the university is giving Professor Michael $500k and reimbursing his counseling costs πŸ’Έ. It's about time they took responsibility for their actions πŸ‘Š. And honestly, I'm kinda glad they did - it raises questions about how much pressure can universities take from politicians and celebrities before someone speaks up πŸ€·β€β™‚οΈ.

But what really gets me is that Professor Michael didn't even mean to hurt anyone with his posts πŸ˜”. He was just expressing his opinion like a normal person would πŸ’¬. It's crazy how quickly things escalated into this huge controversy 🚨. I guess it just goes to show that everyone has the right to an opinion, even if they're not always popular πŸ‘.
 
Back
Top