SophiaRobert

Social Media Exploitation of Vulnerable Individuals

· fashion

Social Media Vultures Are ‘Ruthlessly Exploiting’ the Most Vulnerable for Views – One Council Has Had Enough

The streets of Newcastle have become a battleground for the soul of social media, where vulnerable people are being ruthlessly exploited for clicks and views. A city council has decided to take a stand against what it sees as a form of bullying or harassing behavior.

Filming in public spaces is not necessarily illegal, but the targeting and manipulation of individuals for entertainment value crosses a line. Videos of people struggling with addiction, mental health issues, or being arrested are presented as entertainment for the masses, accompanied by ridicule and disdain in the comment sections. This is not just exploitation – it’s voyeurism on steroids.

The city council has issued community protection warnings to two self-styled “auditors” who have been exploiting vulnerable individuals on TikTok and Meta platforms. For too long, these companies have allowed such videos to spread while claiming to crack down on harassment. The potential prosecution of some of these individuals is a welcome development.

However, the real issue here goes beyond individual cases or specific platforms. It’s about the culture of exploitation that has taken hold online. People’s private lives are being treated as public entertainment, and the vulnerable are being preyed upon for clicks and views. The lines between what’s acceptable and what’s not are becoming increasingly blurred.

Professor Chara Bakalis notes that current legislation is struggling to keep up with the changing nature of harm caused by technology. This problem requires a fundamental shift in how we think about consent, privacy, and the impact of our actions online. The public backlash against Meta’s AI smart glasses has highlighted just how far we’ve strayed from basic human decency.

Lawmakers are under pressure to take action, but there are still questions about the specifics of new legislation. Will it cover filming on smart glasses specifically? Or will it tackle covert filming more broadly? Prof Bakalis believes that new laws are “almost inevitable,” but the details remain unclear.

In the meantime, cities like Newcastle are taking matters into their own hands. The Liberal Democrats have launched a campaign demanding stronger safeguards on smart glasses, including a ban on convicted sex offenders being able to purchase them. This is just one step in what needs to be a wider effort to reclaim our public spaces and protect the vulnerable.

Ultimately, this is not just about social media or technology – it’s about us. It’s about how we treat each other, how we value human dignity, and how we define what’s acceptable in a digital age. The exploitation paradox is a symptom of a deeper problem: our willingness to sacrifice empathy for entertainment.

Reader Views

  • NB
    Nina B. · stylist

    The problem with online exploitation isn't just about individual videos or platforms - it's about the normalization of voyeurism as entertainment. We need to consider how our digital lives intersect with real-world consequences for vulnerable individuals. One key area often overlooked is the impact on service providers who are increasingly being pressured to share intimate client information, further eroding consent and exacerbating harm. It's time to rethink the entire ecosystem driving this exploitation and hold all parties accountable.

  • TH
    Theo H. · menswear writer

    While I applaud Newcastle's council for taking action against these exploitative content creators, we need to acknowledge that the platforms themselves are more to blame than individual users. Companies like Meta and TikTok are designed to prioritize engagement over empathy, making it a challenge for users to distinguish between what's acceptable online behavior and what crosses the line into voyeuristic exploitation. Until these companies fundamentally change their algorithms and moderation policies, we'll continue to see vulnerable individuals treated as entertainment fodder.

  • TC
    The Closet Desk · editorial

    The city council's actions are a step in the right direction, but we shouldn't lose sight of the root issue: these platforms' algorithms amplify and monetize exploitation. The emphasis on individual cases distracts from the systemic problem – social media's inherent incentivization of attention-seeking content. Until we address this, we'll be chasing symptoms rather than the disease. Platforms must be forced to take responsibility for the harm they enable, not just claim to prevent it in their terms and conditions.

Related articles

More from SophiaRobert

View as Web Story →