A US District Court judge has imposed a moratorium on further changes to the President's House exhibits at Independence Mall in Philadelphia, effectively putting the brakes on any attempts to remove them. However, no official decision has been made yet regarding whether the exhibits will be restored.
The exhibits, which detail the lives of nine enslaved people who lived with George Washington at his home during his presidency, were abruptly removed by the National Park Service (NPS) in January after a review deemed some displays "disparaging" to Americans. The city, which had collaborated with the NPS and a coalition of activists on the exhibit's creation, is now seeking their return.
In a hearing on Friday, representatives from the city, the NPS, and the Avenging the Ancestors Coalition presented arguments for and against the removal of the exhibits. Cara McCLellan, an attorney for the coalition, likened the removal to "pulling pages out of a history book with a razor," highlighting the harm it would cause to those who couldn't access the information.
Meanwhile, Assistant US Attorney Gregory argued that removing the exhibits did not amount to irreparable harm, as they are not the only source of this history. He also claimed that the NPS had the right to decide what could be displayed in their displays, citing a 2017 social media post from President Donald Trump which criticized the removal of Confederate statues.
However, Judge Cynthia Rufe pressed Gregory on why the site needed to be taken down, referencing Trump's comments on Confederate statues. She emphasized that no citizen should be subjected to decisions made by those in power on a whim.
The case has sparked a heated debate about the role of government in shaping our understanding of history and the limits of artistic freedom. The city remains committed to fighting for the return of the exhibits, with City Solicitor Renee Garcia reiterating that they are an essential part of Philadelphia's heritage.
The exhibits, which detail the lives of nine enslaved people who lived with George Washington at his home during his presidency, were abruptly removed by the National Park Service (NPS) in January after a review deemed some displays "disparaging" to Americans. The city, which had collaborated with the NPS and a coalition of activists on the exhibit's creation, is now seeking their return.
In a hearing on Friday, representatives from the city, the NPS, and the Avenging the Ancestors Coalition presented arguments for and against the removal of the exhibits. Cara McCLellan, an attorney for the coalition, likened the removal to "pulling pages out of a history book with a razor," highlighting the harm it would cause to those who couldn't access the information.
Meanwhile, Assistant US Attorney Gregory argued that removing the exhibits did not amount to irreparable harm, as they are not the only source of this history. He also claimed that the NPS had the right to decide what could be displayed in their displays, citing a 2017 social media post from President Donald Trump which criticized the removal of Confederate statues.
However, Judge Cynthia Rufe pressed Gregory on why the site needed to be taken down, referencing Trump's comments on Confederate statues. She emphasized that no citizen should be subjected to decisions made by those in power on a whim.
The case has sparked a heated debate about the role of government in shaping our understanding of history and the limits of artistic freedom. The city remains committed to fighting for the return of the exhibits, with City Solicitor Renee Garcia reiterating that they are an essential part of Philadelphia's heritage.
This moratorium is a win-win, 85% of people in Philly agree 
! The city has been right all along, these exhibits are 
vital to understanding the complexities of America's history. Removing them without a proper review was like pulling out a chapter from a book without consulting anyone 
. The fact that the NPS is citing Trump's views on Confederate statues as justification for censorship is 
. We need to make sure our history books are inclusive, not exclusive! 
The city's push for transparency and accountability is what we should be celebrating 
.
I'm like totally shocked the judge put a moratorium on removing those exhibits from the President's House! 
I mean, come on, it's not like they're just some random stuff that can be taken down whenever someone gets upset. Those exhibits are literally about American history and the lives of enslaved people who lived with George Washington 
That's not even relevant to the issue at hand.
.
.
it's all about being honest with ourselves and each other about our country's complicated history 
And I'm with Cara McCLellan - those exhibits are like a crucial piece of a puzzle that helps us understand what life was really like for people like George Washington's enslaved friends. 
Can we ever fully 'unlearn' the hurtful stuff, though, and just focus on moving forward? 
It's all about those Confederate statues drama and Trump's tweets... come on guys! 
It's not like they were trying to rewrite the entire narrative, just give us a little context. But no, instead it was "disparaging"... I mean what even is that? 
. I mean, can't we just have an open discussion about what's displayed in our museums? It feels like it's happening behind closed doors. The fact that Trump's old tweets are being used as justification for this removal is wild 
I feel like the NPS was being super insensitive and didn't think through the impact it would have on people who are already struggling with systemic racism. I mean, can you imagine if someone came to Independence Mall and saw nothing about the lives of enslaved people who lived with George Washington? It's like erasing a part of history! 
.
.