Detroit Judge Weighs Chance at Freedom for Man Wrongly Convicted of Murder, Spends 15 Years in Prison.
In a case that has spanned over two months, Detroit Third Judicial Court Judge Margaret Van Houten is now considering the chance at freedom for Mario Willis, a man who was wrongly convicted of murdering firefighter Walter Harris and spent an exhausting 15 years behind bars. The hearing concluded with testimony by Elizabeth Jacobs, one of Willis's attorneys, who presented crucial evidence that suggests Willis's conviction was based on coerced confessions.
Willis's case dates back to 2008 when Darian Dove, a handyman employed by Willis, set fire at an east side Detroit house where he had invited a woman without Willis's knowledge. The prosecution claimed that Willis paid Dove to set the fire, but this account has been disputed by Dove himself. In his own testimony, Dove later stated that police detectives pressured him into making false statements about being paid by Willis.
According to Jacobs, her previous filings in the Michigan Court of Appeals and U.S. Supreme Court aimed to expose the lies told by Dove, including how he initially claimed the fire was an accident multiple times. Another crucial piece of evidence is a statement from arson investigator Charles "Chuck" Simms, who conducted an interview with Willis that had not been made available to his defense team in 2010.
The interview revealed several exculpatory statements made by Willis, including one where he denied receiving an insurance payment on the house. Jacobs argued that concealment of this interview likely prejudiced Willis's jury against him.
In addition, Willis's trial lawyer Wright Blake admitted to several "oversights" during his representation of Willis, including neglecting to secure a forensic expert who might dispute the ruling of Harris's death as a homicide.
As the hearing concluded, Judge Van Houten expressed her busy courtroom docket and will wait for briefings from both Willis's defense team and Wayne County prosecutors in the coming weeks before issuing a written opinion on his petition for a new trial.
In a case that has spanned over two months, Detroit Third Judicial Court Judge Margaret Van Houten is now considering the chance at freedom for Mario Willis, a man who was wrongly convicted of murdering firefighter Walter Harris and spent an exhausting 15 years behind bars. The hearing concluded with testimony by Elizabeth Jacobs, one of Willis's attorneys, who presented crucial evidence that suggests Willis's conviction was based on coerced confessions.
Willis's case dates back to 2008 when Darian Dove, a handyman employed by Willis, set fire at an east side Detroit house where he had invited a woman without Willis's knowledge. The prosecution claimed that Willis paid Dove to set the fire, but this account has been disputed by Dove himself. In his own testimony, Dove later stated that police detectives pressured him into making false statements about being paid by Willis.
According to Jacobs, her previous filings in the Michigan Court of Appeals and U.S. Supreme Court aimed to expose the lies told by Dove, including how he initially claimed the fire was an accident multiple times. Another crucial piece of evidence is a statement from arson investigator Charles "Chuck" Simms, who conducted an interview with Willis that had not been made available to his defense team in 2010.
The interview revealed several exculpatory statements made by Willis, including one where he denied receiving an insurance payment on the house. Jacobs argued that concealment of this interview likely prejudiced Willis's jury against him.
In addition, Willis's trial lawyer Wright Blake admitted to several "oversights" during his representation of Willis, including neglecting to secure a forensic expert who might dispute the ruling of Harris's death as a homicide.
As the hearing concluded, Judge Van Houten expressed her busy courtroom docket and will wait for briefings from both Willis's defense team and Wayne County prosecutors in the coming weeks before issuing a written opinion on his petition for a new trial.