Top Democrats Seek Full Release of Epstein Case Files Amid Allegations of Cover-Up
The US House Judiciary Committee is demanding that the Justice Department provide immediate access to the full set of Jeffrey Epstein case files, citing concerns about a forthcoming public hearing and allegations of a cover-up. In a formal inquiry sent on Saturday, Democratic lawmakers urged Deputy U.S. Attorney General Todd Blanche to arrange for a review of the files, which they claim have been redacted excessively.
The committee's letter noted that the Justice Department had released only half of the estimated 6 million pages of Epstein-related documents, including over 200,000 pages that were heavily redacted or withheld. In contrast, the department had claimed to have fully complied with congressional oversight responsibilities. The lawmakers accused the agency of withholding documents without justification, citing concerns about "embarrassment, reputational harm, or political sensitivity."
The inquiry was signed by Maryland Democrat Rep. Jamie Raskin, who is the ranking member of the Judiciary Committee. It reminded Blanche that he had previously stated that any member of Congress wishing to review unredacted portions of the files could make arrangements to do so.
This is not the first time lawmakers have sought access to the full set of Epstein case files. In a separate request on Friday, Republican Reps. Thomas Massie and Ro Khanna asked for "unredacted documents" in order to fulfill congressional oversight responsibilities and ensure that survivors receive transparency and accountability.
Epstein's victims and advocates have criticized the Trump administration's handling of the files, including the recent release. Groups such as the Epstein Survivor Coalition have called on the Justice Department to release all remaining documents without delay.
The Justice Department has defended its actions, with Deputy U.S. Attorney General Blanche stating that the agency was following the law when it released the documents. However, the lawmakers' inquiry suggests a growing sense of frustration and skepticism about the department's handling of the case.
The US House Judiciary Committee is demanding that the Justice Department provide immediate access to the full set of Jeffrey Epstein case files, citing concerns about a forthcoming public hearing and allegations of a cover-up. In a formal inquiry sent on Saturday, Democratic lawmakers urged Deputy U.S. Attorney General Todd Blanche to arrange for a review of the files, which they claim have been redacted excessively.
The committee's letter noted that the Justice Department had released only half of the estimated 6 million pages of Epstein-related documents, including over 200,000 pages that were heavily redacted or withheld. In contrast, the department had claimed to have fully complied with congressional oversight responsibilities. The lawmakers accused the agency of withholding documents without justification, citing concerns about "embarrassment, reputational harm, or political sensitivity."
The inquiry was signed by Maryland Democrat Rep. Jamie Raskin, who is the ranking member of the Judiciary Committee. It reminded Blanche that he had previously stated that any member of Congress wishing to review unredacted portions of the files could make arrangements to do so.
This is not the first time lawmakers have sought access to the full set of Epstein case files. In a separate request on Friday, Republican Reps. Thomas Massie and Ro Khanna asked for "unredacted documents" in order to fulfill congressional oversight responsibilities and ensure that survivors receive transparency and accountability.
Epstein's victims and advocates have criticized the Trump administration's handling of the files, including the recent release. Groups such as the Epstein Survivor Coalition have called on the Justice Department to release all remaining documents without delay.
The Justice Department has defended its actions, with Deputy U.S. Attorney General Blanche stating that the agency was following the law when it released the documents. However, the lawmakers' inquiry suggests a growing sense of frustration and skepticism about the department's handling of the case.
... like, can't we just get to the bottom of things already? 
The thought of 6 million pages of documents being redacted excessively is just mind-boggling... what are they hiding? 
And now this latest inquiry from the Democrats is like, finally someone's taking a stand. I'm rooting for Jamie Raskin and those other lawmakers who are fighting to get the truth out. It's about time we see some accountability in this situation 
I mean, think about it, 6 million pages is like, a LOT of info. What are they hiding, huh? 
The Justice Department is saying it's all about following the law, but I'm not buying it. 
I know some people think there's a cover-up going on and from what I've seen so far, it doesn't look good. 
The fact that they released only half of the documents is suspicious enough. What's wrong with transparency? 
Anyway, gotta keep pushing for those unredacted docs! 
... Like, I get why they wanna know what really went down with Epstein. 6 million pages is a lotta info to sift through, but can't we just focus on making sure justice is served? 
Redactions are understandable, I guess, but excessive redaction is where it gets sketchy. It's like they're hiding something... or not revealing the whole truth 
. Can't hurt to have transparency in gov, you know? 
Transparency and accountability for all parties involved 
. Like, 6 million pages is a lot to redact, you know? And the Justice Department is still holding back on releasing all the deets... it's just too convenient that they're only releasing half of them now. The victims and advocates are right, transparency is key in cases like this. And what's with the excuses about "embarrassment" and "reputational harm"? 
.
. And those redactions? Like, what are they hiding? Did the Justice Department really need to hide so much stuff? 
. Maybe some things are better left in the shadows? But I guess that's a whole other can of worms 
.
.
I don't blame them for being skeptical about the Justice Department's actions - it does seem fishy how many pages are redacted or withheld. Maybe they should just release everything already? 
to visit my aunt in LA and her neighbor has this crazy old dog that's like 20 years old lol it was so adorable but also kinda sad thinking about how fast time flies... anyway, have you guys ever noticed how weird it is when they release just half of the documents related to a super high-profile case like Epstein? 
! 6 million pages is a lot, but it's like they're hiding something behind a mask of transparency 
. I'm starting to think we should have a timeline of all these redacted releases 
, just to see the pattern emerging 
.
. And let's be real, some of those files might be super sensitive, you know? The agency's gotta protect themselves from getting roasted by Congress and the media. I mean, what if some shady politician comes forward with a new set of allegations just to stir up drama? We can't have that 
. The government needs to come clean on what really went down with Epstein and his connections to powerful people 
. We need to know what we're talking about here!
.
. like, do we really need to know every single detail of epstein's crimes or can we get the gist of it and still be safe 
. dey r hidin somethin and its not right. i hope rep jamie raskin gets to da bottom of dis soon 
.
. I FEEL FOR THE SURVIVORS WHO HAVE BEEN WAITING FOREVER FOR TRUTH AND JUSTICE. THE FACT THAT THERE ARE ONLY 6 MILLION PAGES AND YET WE'VE ONLY SEEN HALF OF THEM IS LIKE, WHAT'S GOING ON HERE?! IT SMELLS LIKE SOMETHING FISHY TO ME 
.
and making sure those who were harmed by epstein get the justice they deserve