April 3, 2023 Trump indictment news | CNN Politics

Lawyers for former US President Donald Trump have submitted a letter to a New York judge opposing media requests to broadcast his arraignment on Tuesday. The lawyers argue that allowing cameras and video coverage would create a "circus-like atmosphere," raise security concerns, and be inconsistent with Trump's presumption of innocence.

In the letter, Trump's attorneys also cited court rules requiring judges to consider potential security concerns when making decisions about media access during proceedings. They claimed that broadcasting Trump's arraignment would only heighten these concerns and potentially compromise his safety.

The lawyers' request comes as several major news outlets, including CNN, have sought permission to broadcast the arraignment live. However, the Manhattan District Attorney's office has stated that it will defer to the judge's discretion in determining how to manage the courtroom on Tuesday.

In 2021, a similar request was made for Trump Organization CFO Allen Weisselberg's arraignment, and the judge allowed a limited number of still photographs to be taken before proceedings began. While CNN and other outlets are seeking camera access for this week's arraignment, it remains unclear whether they will ultimately be granted permission.

As the hearing approaches, questions surrounding media access and security remain at the forefront of discussions.
 
So Trump is trying to keep his arraignment private like he's still the Prez 😏. But come on, he's not exactly the most discreet guy in the world. I think it's a bit much for him to expect complete secrecy considering he's being charged with some serious crimes.

And honestly, can't we just have a little transparency here? The public has a right to know what's going down in our justice system, especially when it involves a former head of state. It's not like the media is just going to sensationalize everything – they're just trying to report on the facts.

Security concerns are probably valid, but that doesn't mean we have to seal off the whole courtroom. A few cameras and reporters shouldn't be too much trouble, right? I mean, it's not like Trump is going to jump out of a window or anything 🀣.
 
πŸ€” i mean, can u imagine if trump showed up to court without his signature 'hair do? πŸ˜‚ would that even be a thing? anyway, seriously tho, it seems like a no-brainer to me - cameras in the courtroom are just gonna bring more drama and stress for everyone involved. what's the point of live streaming a formal arraignment when the outcome is pretty much already known? πŸ€·β€β™‚οΈ
 
man...can't believe how intense this whole thing is getting 😬. i feel bad for donald trump, he's going through a tough time but at the same time, people wanna know what's gonna happen πŸ€”. cameras in court? it's like a reality show or something...but on the other hand, isn't that kinda fair to the public who are all curious about what's going down in this whole thing? πŸ“Ί. anyway, i hope whoever is arraigning him makes a decision soon so we can all stop speculating πŸ’­. maybe this will be a turning point for trump and he'll come out of it stronger than ever...or maybe not 🀞
 
I dont get why trump's lawyers are being so dramatic about it πŸ€”... i mean, its just a court arraignment, right? a little bit of live TV never hurt anyone πŸ“Ί theyre making a big deal out of it and its annoying me πŸ˜’... and what about the publics right to know? shouldn't we be able to see our ex president being arraigned in person? πŸ€·β€β™‚οΈ its not like he's going to get a free pass or anything just because his lawyers are whining about security concerns πŸ™„
 
I'm kinda surprised that Trump's lawyers are trying to block the cameras from showing up on Tuesday πŸ€”. I mean, we're talking about a former President here, but at the same time, it is an arraignment – it's not like he's being tried for anything new πŸ˜‚. I think the courts should be pretty transparent about this kind of thing, you know? But at the same time, I get where they're coming from – security is a big deal, especially when you've got someone as... let's say, 'public' as Trump πŸ€·β€β™‚οΈ.

I wonder if it'll all work out in the end. Will CNN and the others get permission to broadcast live? It feels like we're just going to have to wait and see what the judge decides πŸ‘€.
 
πŸ€” I don't get why Trump's lawyers want to keep his arraignment private πŸ“Ί. It's like, he's going to court for something, so it makes sense that people want to know what's going on, right? πŸ€·β€β™‚οΈ I mean, I get the security concerns and all that, but can't they just take some basic precautions to make sure everything runs smoothly? 🚫 It feels like they're trying to hide something from us, you know? πŸ˜’
 
πŸ€” I don't get why they need to keep it so secret anyway... like, isn't this a public thing? The guy's going to arraign... it's kinda like in school when you're getting in trouble for something, but instead it's a whole country thing πŸ™ƒ. Security is a concern, I guess, but can't we just have some basic transparency here? It feels like they're trying to control every aspect of this whole situation, even the cameras πŸ“Ή. Don't get me wrong, safety first and all that, but come on... it's not like he's going to make a break for it or something πŸ˜‚.
 
I don't get why Trump is making such a big deal about cameras in the courtroom πŸ€”. It's just TV, right? People want to know what's going on. And if security is that much of an issue, maybe they should've done something about it before now πŸ”’. I mean, Trump's been in some pretty high-profile situations already - wouldn't a little live coverage be a small price to pay for transparency? πŸ“Ί Plus, isn't arraignment like, the whole point of this whole thing? Let the public see what's going on and how justice is being served. It's not that hard to balance security with giving people a glimpse into the proceedings... unless Trump's really worried about getting his mugshot out there πŸ™ƒ
 
trump thinks he's still above the law lol 🀣 and his lawyers are trying to control every little thing about this arraignment what if he does something crazy in front of the whole world? wouldn't that be some entertainment for the cameras πŸ“Ί they're all worried about security but at the end of the day it's trump we're talking about - a guy who thinks he can just tweet his way out of trouble πŸ˜‚
 
I don't get why they can't just show a video of Trump walking into court like everyone else πŸ˜‚... is that so hard? And what's with all these "circus-like atmosphere" warnings? It sounds like lawyers are more worried about how it'll look on TV than actual security concerns πŸ€·β€β™€οΈ. I mean, wouldn't showing the arraignment live just make it more interesting for everyone watching? πŸ“Ί It feels like they're trying to control the narrative too much... can we just have some real news coverage here? πŸ“°
 
🚨 "The truth is rarely pure and never simple." - Oscar Wilde It's like when you're trying to get info about some big case but everyone has their own take on it...
 
I'm low-key surprised they're not allowing cameras in. I mean, don't get me wrong, I feel for Trump's team about the circus thing, but come on, he's a public figure now πŸ€·β€β™‚οΈ. And what's the big deal about security? He's gonna be safe or whatever. And if it's that much of an issue, can't they just have a private hearing like everyone else? I'm not buying the whole "circus atmosphere" thing. It's just a PR stunt to control the narrative πŸ“°.
 
OMG I'm low-key worried about Trump's safety πŸ€”... I mean, can you blame them tho? His whole life has been drama, and now he's getting arraigned in NYC πŸ—½οΈ it's like the ultimate reality TV show πŸ˜‚ but for real though, how do they even ensure his security with all these cameras and reporters around? πŸ“ΊπŸ’₯ my friend's cousin is a prosecutor and she said that the DA is being super cautious about this whole thing... I don't blame them either πŸ˜…
 
I'm thinking, a circus-like atmosphere? That's just like his inauguration, but without the excitement! 🀣 Can you imagine Trump trying to give a serious speech with all those cameras going off in the background? "And that's why we need more walls... and better lighting!" πŸ˜‚
 
I'm not sure why Trump's lawyers would want to keep his arraignment under wraps, considering he's already had a pretty tumultuous run for public office πŸ€”. I mean, think about it - this is a guy who's used to being in the spotlight and has a reputation for stirring up controversy. Keeping the cameras out might be seen as a way to avoid drawing more attention to himself than necessary. Plus, let's be real, how much of an impact could some media coverage really have on his 'presumption of innocence' πŸ€·β€β™‚οΈ? It feels like a classic case of playing it safe and wanting to control the narrative - but will it actually keep him from getting what he wants in the end? Only time (and the judge's decision) will tell!
 
idk why trump's lawyers need to be so secretive about his arraignment πŸ€·β€β™‚οΈ it seems like a big deal for people to watch him get charged and i'm curious what's gonna happen on tuesday... maybe they're worried about people getting too excited or something? πŸ“Ί but at the same time, don't we have a right to see our elected officials held accountable in court? shouldn't that be public? πŸ€” it's just weird that trump is being treated differently than other high-profile cases... anyway, i guess only time will tell what happens on tuesday πŸ•°οΈ
 
Wow 🀯, I find it so interesting that Trump's lawyers are trying to block live coverage of his arraignment, citing a "circus-like atmosphere" πŸ˜‚πŸŽͺ. Like, isn't this what we're paying our taxes for - to see the high and mighty get treated like, well, everybody else? πŸ€·β€β™‚οΈ
 
the whole thing feels so scripted πŸ™„. i mean, who needs a circus-like atmosphere when you're dealing with serious legal stuff? can't we just focus on what's really important - justice for all? and yeah, trump's lawyers are totally right about security concerns... it's not like he's some kinda celebrity or something πŸ€·β€β™‚οΈ. news outlets think they can just waltz in there and get a free show? please. the judge should make an informed decision that prioritizes safety and fairness over sensationalism. let's keep things civil and professional, not like we need all this drama πŸ˜’.
 
πŸ€” I'm surprised they're even considering not broadcasting Trump's arraignment live πŸ“ΊοΈ. I mean, it's a public figure, right? He's got the right to free speech and a fair trial. The whole "circus-like atmosphere" thing is just an excuse for his team to control the narrative. And security concerns are valid, but so is transparency. It's a catch-22. The court has to find a balance between keeping things secure and keeping the public informed. Let's hope the judge makes the right call 🀞.
 
Back
Top