UK Campaigners Push for Change to Stop Police from Using Music Lyrics as Evidence
A growing campaign by human rights groups has urged UK ministers to overhaul existing laws that allow police to use music lyrics as evidence in court. The move aims to address a concerning trend where young black men are disproportionately targeted and the practice is seen as stifling creativity.
Currently, the law allows police to scrutinize defendants' musical tastes, flagging appearances in music videos or lyricists they believe may be affiliated with gangs or involved in criminal activity. Campaigners argue that this practice has no place in a fair trial and paints an unfair picture of innocent people's artistic expression.
Baroness Shami Chakrabarti, who is leading the charge, warns that equating someone's musical preferences to their intentions is "ridiculous" and "extraordinary." She hopes her proposed amendment will gain support from key stakeholders, including Deputy Prime Minister David Lammy.
The change aims to restrict the use of music lyrics as evidence to only those cases where the connection is direct and clear-cut. Campaigners also want expert witnesses on this issue to be independent and subject to procedural safeguards against bias.
Recent years have seen a significant increase in appeals involving cases where police relied on lyrics or music videos to build their cases, with over 70 trials from 2020-23 being identified as using rap-related evidence. While the Crown Prosecution Service has denied ever prosecuting someone solely based on their involvement with drill/rap music, experts argue that such a practice is abusive and unfairly burdens certain communities.
The campaign's Art Not Evidence initiative argues that creative expressions are often misleading or exaggerated and have no connection to alleged crimes. They call for greater protection of artistic freedom and an end to the misuse of lyrics as evidence in court.
A growing campaign by human rights groups has urged UK ministers to overhaul existing laws that allow police to use music lyrics as evidence in court. The move aims to address a concerning trend where young black men are disproportionately targeted and the practice is seen as stifling creativity.
Currently, the law allows police to scrutinize defendants' musical tastes, flagging appearances in music videos or lyricists they believe may be affiliated with gangs or involved in criminal activity. Campaigners argue that this practice has no place in a fair trial and paints an unfair picture of innocent people's artistic expression.
Baroness Shami Chakrabarti, who is leading the charge, warns that equating someone's musical preferences to their intentions is "ridiculous" and "extraordinary." She hopes her proposed amendment will gain support from key stakeholders, including Deputy Prime Minister David Lammy.
The change aims to restrict the use of music lyrics as evidence to only those cases where the connection is direct and clear-cut. Campaigners also want expert witnesses on this issue to be independent and subject to procedural safeguards against bias.
Recent years have seen a significant increase in appeals involving cases where police relied on lyrics or music videos to build their cases, with over 70 trials from 2020-23 being identified as using rap-related evidence. While the Crown Prosecution Service has denied ever prosecuting someone solely based on their involvement with drill/rap music, experts argue that such a practice is abusive and unfairly burdens certain communities.
The campaign's Art Not Evidence initiative argues that creative expressions are often misleading or exaggerated and have no connection to alleged crimes. They call for greater protection of artistic freedom and an end to the misuse of lyrics as evidence in court.