Big Business is Tired of Being the Only One Singing on Gun Reform
Corporate leaders have been vocal about gun control for years, but after the latest mass shooting in Nashville, many are noticeably quiet. What's behind this sudden silence from America's biggest CEOs? According to Yale professor Jeffrey Sonnenfeld, who has a direct line to major executives, they're frustrated.
Their previous efforts haven't done much to push the needle on gun control legislation and without more backing, they don't know what else they can do at the moment. They've joined causes with valor and nobility, but they can't just take cause after cause as if there's nobody else in society. The social change that happened in the 1960s wasn't led primarily by CEOs; it was led by clergy, students, and activists.
The CEOs are still active on various issues, including voting rights and sustainability, but they're waiting for others to join them. They don't need to restate something they've already stated. They've jumped into the pool where CEOs take a stand, but who's jumping in beside them? The nation's CEOs are waiting for everybody else to join them.
So what led to this complacency amongst Americans and the growing reliance on CEOs to advocate on our behalf? Well, it turns out that many big businesses have taken a strong stance on gun control, going further than the general public. However, their actions in the streets aren't matching their words. They're frustrated because they want social capital β public trust β but need the rest of civil society to join them.
And is this silence due to CEOs holding the purse strings? Nope, that's just a common misconception. Since the 2020 elections, much less campaign contributions have come from big business. In fact, many companies have either put an official moratorium on giving to politicians or given mere pennies.
Corporate leaders have been vocal about gun control for years, but after the latest mass shooting in Nashville, many are noticeably quiet. What's behind this sudden silence from America's biggest CEOs? According to Yale professor Jeffrey Sonnenfeld, who has a direct line to major executives, they're frustrated.
Their previous efforts haven't done much to push the needle on gun control legislation and without more backing, they don't know what else they can do at the moment. They've joined causes with valor and nobility, but they can't just take cause after cause as if there's nobody else in society. The social change that happened in the 1960s wasn't led primarily by CEOs; it was led by clergy, students, and activists.
The CEOs are still active on various issues, including voting rights and sustainability, but they're waiting for others to join them. They don't need to restate something they've already stated. They've jumped into the pool where CEOs take a stand, but who's jumping in beside them? The nation's CEOs are waiting for everybody else to join them.
So what led to this complacency amongst Americans and the growing reliance on CEOs to advocate on our behalf? Well, it turns out that many big businesses have taken a strong stance on gun control, going further than the general public. However, their actions in the streets aren't matching their words. They're frustrated because they want social capital β public trust β but need the rest of civil society to join them.
And is this silence due to CEOs holding the purse strings? Nope, that's just a common misconception. Since the 2020 elections, much less campaign contributions have come from big business. In fact, many companies have either put an official moratorium on giving to politicians or given mere pennies.