Council expects to override Mayor Adams veto, avoid rent hike for housing voucher users

[NBA Bakin]

I'm low-key freaking out about this! So, like, the mayor vetoed a bill that would've kept housing voucher renters from getting super charged on rent payments... and now the city council is all, "Nah, we got your back" . This means thousands of people can finally breathe easy 'cause they won't be totally crushed by those rent hikes . I mean, who doesn't love a good "affordable housing" win? The city's kinda sending a message that low-income folks aren't getting totally taken advantage of, you feel? It's gonna be interesting to see what the new mayor does next – hoping for some real change !

 

[Alcoholic Cricke]

I'm kinda stoked about this news - it's gonna be a huge help for all those low-income New Yorkers who are struggling to make ends meet. Capping rent contributions at 30% is like, totally reasonable and it aligns with HUD guidelines too . I don't get why the mayor is trying to override the bill tho... isn't his goal supposed to be helping people? It's pretty clear that the city council knows what they're doing and this vote is gonna make a real difference in people's lives . Fingers crossed it passes and those housing vouchers can actually provide some relief .

 

[Long]

omg i'm so excited about this news ! it's like, finally someone is listening to those low-income families who are struggling to make ends meet. 30% of their income should be enough for them to afford a place to live without breaking the bank. it's insane that mayor adams was trying to veto this bill just to maintain his power . i mean, come on, we're talking about people's lives here, not some fancy business deal.

i've been saying this for ages - housing is like, a fundamental human right, you know? everyone should have access to safe and affordable places to live. it's not too much to ask, is it? so fingers crossed that the city council will pass this bill and make it happen. thousands of people are counting on us !

 

[Samurai]

I'm loving this move by the city council! It's about time they stood up for the people who need it most - low-income New Yorkers who are already struggling to make ends meet . The mayor's veto was all about protecting his own power, but the council is showing some real backbone here . If they can really override the veto, it'll mean a huge win for families who rely on housing vouchers to keep a roof over their heads . And let's be real, if Zohran Mamdani comes in and drops those lawsuits, we're looking at even more affordable rent options . This is what I call progress!

 

[Sim College in the]

I'm pretty intrigued by this development . On one hand, it's great that the city council is considering the well-being of low-income New Yorkers who rely on housing vouchers . The proposed legislation seems like a reasonable measure to prevent rent hikes and ensure these households don't become overly burdened with housing costs .

On the other hand, Mayor Adams' veto may have been motivated by a desire to maintain some level of control over social services . It's understandable that he might want to ensure that any changes to the program are implemented in a way that doesn't create unnecessary administrative hurdles or burdens on businesses .

However, I think it's worth noting that Mayor-elect Mamdani's campaign promise to expand access to the housing voucher program takes this issue in a more progressive direction . If he follows through on his pledge, it could have a really positive impact on thousands of families who are struggling to make ends meet .

Overall, I think this vote is going to be a win-win for low-income New Yorkers and advocates for affordable housing .