A Nightmarish Arrest in Brooklyn Raises Questions About ICE's Power
For Hayk Safaryan, a 44-year-old Armenian immigrant who has lived in the United States for over two decades, one ordinary morning turned into a "traumatic nightmare" when federal immigration officers stormed his Brooklyn home.
According to court testimony from Safaryan's wife Léah Lazonick, the officers knocked on their door early last summer, asking for identification. When Safaryan opened it, they asked him to step aside and immediately called out an armed SWAT team of six people who entered the apartment in a heavily armed response. The officers detained Safaryan, taking his personal documents without consent or a judicial warrant.
Safaryan, accused of grand larceny for allegedly accepting hundreds of thousands of dollars for a home renovation project, has been held in ICE custody since June. His lawyers argue that ICE denied him due process, as he was unable to attend several court hearings while in detention. Safaryan's wife is now facing eviction from their apartment and an exhausting, depressing experience.
This incident highlights the recent controversy surrounding Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) officers' enforcement actions. An internal memo issued by ICE in May, leaked last month to the Associated Press, allowed agents to forcibly enter homes without residents' consent or a judicial warrant. This guidance contradicts long-standing Supreme Court precedent on home searches and private property.
Advocacy groups are pushing for reforms, including a ban on DHS officers entering private property without a judicial warrant. New York state Governor Kathy Hochul announced a proposal in her State of the State address to restrict federal immigration officers from entering "sensitive locations" such as schools, hospitals, and housing accommodations without obtaining a judicial warrant.
The case against Safaryan has sparked concern among advocates for civil liberties, who warn that ICE's actions threaten all constitutional rights. As one lawyer put it, "You do not have to open your door unless an immigration officer shows you a judicial warrant."
With thousands of similar lawsuits challenging immigration arrests across the country, questions remain about the limits of ICE officers' power and the constitutional protections against unreasonable searches and seizures.
For Hayk Safaryan, a 44-year-old Armenian immigrant who has lived in the United States for over two decades, one ordinary morning turned into a "traumatic nightmare" when federal immigration officers stormed his Brooklyn home.
According to court testimony from Safaryan's wife Léah Lazonick, the officers knocked on their door early last summer, asking for identification. When Safaryan opened it, they asked him to step aside and immediately called out an armed SWAT team of six people who entered the apartment in a heavily armed response. The officers detained Safaryan, taking his personal documents without consent or a judicial warrant.
Safaryan, accused of grand larceny for allegedly accepting hundreds of thousands of dollars for a home renovation project, has been held in ICE custody since June. His lawyers argue that ICE denied him due process, as he was unable to attend several court hearings while in detention. Safaryan's wife is now facing eviction from their apartment and an exhausting, depressing experience.
This incident highlights the recent controversy surrounding Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) officers' enforcement actions. An internal memo issued by ICE in May, leaked last month to the Associated Press, allowed agents to forcibly enter homes without residents' consent or a judicial warrant. This guidance contradicts long-standing Supreme Court precedent on home searches and private property.
Advocacy groups are pushing for reforms, including a ban on DHS officers entering private property without a judicial warrant. New York state Governor Kathy Hochul announced a proposal in her State of the State address to restrict federal immigration officers from entering "sensitive locations" such as schools, hospitals, and housing accommodations without obtaining a judicial warrant.
The case against Safaryan has sparked concern among advocates for civil liberties, who warn that ICE's actions threaten all constitutional rights. As one lawyer put it, "You do not have to open your door unless an immigration officer shows you a judicial warrant."
With thousands of similar lawsuits challenging immigration arrests across the country, questions remain about the limits of ICE officers' power and the constitutional protections against unreasonable searches and seizures.
And can we talk about how these people are just getting swept up in the system without any real due process? Like, hundreds of thousands of dollars for a home renovation project? That's not exactly "grand larceny" material... 
Anyway, I guess this is what they mean by "trumped up charges"... 
. I mean, who gives agents carte blanche to enter someone's home without a warrant? It's like they think they're above the law 
. The government needs to get its priorities straight and protect people's constitutional rights, not make things up as they go along 
.
this is so messed up...ICE's internal memo is straight outta Minority Report 
, no one should be subject to a warrantless entry into their home...the gov't needs to get its priorities straight & focus on protecting ppl's rights instead of flexing its enforcement muscle 
.
It's crazy that they can just barge into someone's home and take their stuff without a warrant - it's like something out of a bad movie! 
It feels like they're just looking for an excuse to make life harder on people who are already in a tough spot.
I know Hayk is accused of something, but come on! Don't we have a better system than this?
We should be worried when our leaders start handing out "guidelines" like this without even testing them in court first. 
. I'm all for reform, especially if they can limit these kinds of invasive searches without a warrant. I mean, come on, if you don't have one, why are you just barging in? 
It's about time we stood up to ICE and said enough is enough 
.
We need to protect people's rights and make sure these agents aren't just running around willy-nilly. It's not just about Safaryan's case; it's about setting a precedent for all the others who are being unfairly targeted by ICE.
. I'm all for Governor Hochul's proposal, and I think we should be supporting advocacy groups fighting for civil liberties too 
. I mean, come on, they're essentially saying "we can do what we want" because some memo says so. And now people are actually being detained without a warrant, it's insane. What's next? They're gonna start showing up at your doorstep uninvited and taking whatever they want? It's like a bad action movie script 
. it's not just about grand larceny, it's about the principle of the thing. if there's a warrant, that's one thing, but storming into someone's home without even asking is a whole different story 
. we need to make sure our laws are clear and protect people's rights, especially when it comes to their homes 
. what's next? do they get to search our phones and laptops too? 
this is getting out of hand 
. let's focus on finding a solution that doesn't feel like it's being made up on the fly 
.