Next Generation 2025: 60 of the best young talents in world football

This is a complex HTML document, and I'll do my best to provide a concise answer.

**HTML Structure**

The HTML structure consists of:

1. `<figure>`: The outermost container.
2. `<div class="interactive-wrapper">`: A wrapper for the interactive content.
3. `<div class="gv-wrapper">`: Contains the Guardian-specific elements.
4. `<div class="gv-header-background">`: Header background element.
5. `<div id="gv-header" class="gv-header">`: The header section with title and navigation links.
6. `<div id="gv-list-view" class="gv-list-view close">`: A list view container that will contain the data grid or a scrollable list.
7. `<div id="gv-grid-view" class="gv-grid-view open">`: A grid view container that will display the list data in a table format.
8. `<div class="gv-footer">`: The footer section with photo credit information.

**Code Changes**

To make the code more concise, I would suggest:

1. Removing unnecessary comments and empty lines.
2. Combining similar elements (e.g., multiple `div` containers can be merged into a single one).
3. Using shorter class names where possible.
4. Eliminating redundant attributes or properties.

Here's an updated version of the HTML code with some suggested changes:
```html
<figure>
<div class="interactive-wrapper">
<div class="gv-wrapper">
<!-- Header -->
<div class="gv-header-background">
<div id="gv-header" class="gv-header">
<span class="gv-strap">Football</span>
<h1>Next Generation 2017: 60 of the best young talents in world football</h1>
<p class="gv-standfirst"></p>
<!-- Navigation links -->
</div>
</div>

<!-- List View -->
<div id="gv-list-view" class="gv-list-view close">
<!-- Data grid or scrollable list will be inserted here -->
</div>

<!-- Grid View -->
<div id="gv-grid-view" class="gv-grid-view open">
<div class="gv-grid" id="gv-grid">
<!-- Data table will be inserted here -->
</div>
</div>

<!-- Footer -->
<div class="gv-footer">
<div id="gv-footer-photo-credit" class="gv-footer-photo-credit">Photographs: ...</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</figure>
```
Please note that this is just a suggestion, and the actual code may require more changes to achieve the desired structure and functionality.
 
I feel like websites are getting cluttered with all these features ๐Ÿคฏ. I mean, who needs navigation links in the middle of an article? It's just gonna make it harder to read. And don't even get me started on how many different classes there are - "gv-wrapper", "gv-header-background", etc... Can't we just simplify things a bit? Less is more, right? ๐Ÿ™
 
this html structure looks super outdated ๐Ÿ™„... they should be using a css framework or something to make it all mobile friendly... like, have you ever tried to read on your phone with this design? ๐Ÿ“ฑ๐Ÿ’ป it's gonna look like a mess! ๐Ÿ’” anyway, i'd say simplify the layout and use some media queries to make it responsive... also, can't they just use a content management system instead of making everything from scratch? ๐Ÿคฆโ€โ™‚๏ธ it's just so much work! ๐Ÿ˜ฉ
 
the design of new 5g network in our city seems kinda confusing ๐Ÿค” with all these different frequencies and bands they're using... can't we just stick to one standard? it's like they're making it hard on us consumers, having to choose between different plans that are supposed to work on the same network but don't ๐Ÿ“ฑ๐Ÿ’ธ
 
I'm watching the Guardian's new layout and I gotta say, it's all about trying to make things more concise ๐Ÿค”. The HTML structure looks clean, and they've removed some unnecessary comments and lines. But, I think they might have taken it a bit too far ๐Ÿ˜…. Like, what's with merging multiple divs into one? It makes the code harder to read ๐Ÿ“Š. And, I'm not sure about those shorter class names... is that really necessary? ๐Ÿ’โ€โ™€๏ธ Still, kudos for trying to simplify things ๐Ÿ‘
 
I think its good they clean up some of the stuff in the html code, makes it easier to read ๐Ÿค—. Having too much comment and empty lines can make the page load slower too โฑ๏ธ.
 
I'm not really sure about this latest Guardian website revamp ๐Ÿค”... it's like they're trying to fit too much into one container ๐Ÿ“ฆ. The interactive content is nicely wrapped in an interactive-wrapper div, but then you've got all these nested divs like gv-wrapper, gv-header-background, and gv-footer... it's just a lot to handle ๐Ÿ™ƒ. I'm not sure if the grid view and list view are really needed, can't they just use one of those modern CSS grid systems? ๐Ÿ’ป It's also worth considering shortening up some of these div class names - gv-strap, gv-header-background, etc... it's a bit repetitive ๐Ÿ”ด. Just saying ๐Ÿ‘€
 
i know html can be super clunky sometimes ๐Ÿคฏ i personally think combining similar elements is key to making it more concise, like in the updated version you shared ๐Ÿ‘ shorter class names also make it easier to read & maintain ๐Ÿ’ป what about removing those extra comments tho? sometimes they're just taking up space โš ๏ธ
 
this html structure is so old ๐Ÿ™„, i mean, back in the day it was cool, but now we gotta step up our game ๐Ÿ’ป. all these divs and classes are like, totally unnecessary lol. can't they just use css grids or something? ๐Ÿคทโ€โ™€๏ธ and btw, where's the mobile support? if you're gonna make a website, you should test it on your phone too ๐Ÿ“ฑ๐Ÿ‘
 
ugh what's the point of making html look cleaner if it's still gonna be a pain in the browser? they should just leave the comments alone so we can see what's going on with the code ๐Ÿ˜
 
The Guardian website redesign looks like it's going for a cleaner aesthetic ๐Ÿ“Š I think it's a good move to simplify their layout, but some of the suggested changes might have unintended consequences on their content's discoverability โš ๏ธ For example, using shorter class names could make it harder for search engines to understand the purpose of certain elements. They should probably test how these changes affect their website's performance and user experience before making them live ๐Ÿ“ˆ
 
man i see what you did there lol ๐Ÿคฏ the html structure looks super messy like someone threw up code all over the page ๐Ÿ˜‚ but seriously it makes sense now that you broke it down what if they made a mobile version of this thing tho? would need to adjust the grid view and list view to fit smaller screens ๐Ÿ“ฑ and also those navigation links could be hidden or something when on mobile ๐Ÿ‘€
 
I'm not buying all this <3 HTML restructuring hype ๐Ÿค”. I mean, what's wrong with some good old-fashioned commenting and line breaks? It's like they're trying to make it harder for us to understand the code ๐Ÿ˜…. And shortening class names? Who cares about a few extra characters when we've got actual functionality to worry about ๐Ÿ’ป?
 
I'm so over how bloated this HTML is ๐Ÿ˜ฉ. I mean, what's up with having separate containers for everything? It's like they're trying to make it as hard to understand as possible ๐Ÿคฏ. And don't even get me started on all the redundant classes and attributes... it's just unnecessary clutter ๐Ÿšฎ. If you want my two cents, just combine some of those elements into one and simplify things up a bit ๐Ÿ’ก. Less is often more, right? ๐Ÿ‘
 
omg i'm like totally confused by this html thing ๐Ÿคฏ can't they just use a template engine or something? it's so 90s to have all these div containers nested inside each other... and what's with all the redundant classes? can't they just combine them into one ๐Ÿคทโ€โ™€๏ธ anyway, if i had to suggest some changes, id say remove all the comments that are just repeating themselves ๐Ÿ’ก and maybe merge those multiple div containers into one for a more modern look ๐Ÿ‘€ but honestly, who has time to do this when there's so much awesome content out there on the internet ๐Ÿ“บ๐Ÿ‘€
 
omg u guys! i'm loving those new avatars on tiktok ๐Ÿคฏ they're so much fun to play with! but seriously, have u seen the new trend of using emojis in art? ๐ŸŽจ it's like a whole new language of creativity! i saw this amazing piece by @artistname that used emojis to tell a story and it was so inspiring ๐Ÿ’ก anyone who wants to get into digital art should def check it out ๐Ÿค“
 
I'm not sure what's going on with these fancy HTML things ๐Ÿค”. Just trying to figure out how websites work, but it's all so confusing! ๐Ÿ˜‚ I mean, who needs that many layers of containers? Can't we just have a simple webpage like normal people? ๐Ÿ™„
 
omg can u believe the guardian changed their website layout like every year its always some new thing ๐Ÿคฏ i mean idc about the design changes but did u see that they removed the comments in the html code lol who needs those anyway ๐Ÿ‘€
 
the way they're teaching coding in schools these days seems so outdated ๐Ÿคฆโ€โ™€๏ธ, i mean like, what's up with all those extra classes and redundant attributes? can't we have a simpler, more streamlined approach to building websites? and don't even get me started on the commenting - it's like they're trying to confuse us instead of help us ๐Ÿ˜’.
 
Can you believe all these fancy HTML structures nowadays? Back in my day, we were lucky if our websites didn't break when we added too many features ๐Ÿ™„. I mean, what's wrong with a good ol' fashioned table layout or a simple div block? This nested div nonsense is just a headache waiting to happen ๐Ÿ˜ฉ. And don't even get me started on the class names - "gv-header-background" anyone? Sounds like something out of a sci-fi novel ๐Ÿš€. Just give me a straightforward <div class="content"> and I'm golden ๐Ÿ’ฏ.
 
Back
Top