Nvidia's years-long push to sell its powerful AI chips to China has finally paid off in a major way. The US chipmaker said last week that hundreds of thousands of its H200 chips had been approved for sale to Chinese companies, including tech giants ByteDance and Alibaba.
The move marks a significant shift in US policy on the export of sensitive technology to China, where concerns over national security have long dominated discussions. But after years of tensions between Washington and Beijing, it appears that the Trump administration's "strategic patience" approach has finally borne fruit.
Under President Trump, White House officials have been secretly working with Nvidia CEO Jensen Huang to find a way to allow some Chinese companies to buy US-made chips without compromising national security concerns. The idea was to strike a balance between keeping China dependent on US technology and preventing the country from developing its own powerful AI systems.
The new policy has sparked a mixed reaction in Washington, where some experts say it may ultimately prove counterproductive. By allowing domestic companies to buy H200 chips, Beijing is now able to achieve two strategic goals at once: getting access to top-notch compute power for training advanced AI models, while keeping the demand for Huawei chips high and encouraging China's domestic semiconductor industry to continue growing.
"This David Sacks idea of keeping China hooked on American technology is just not how this is going to go," says Samuel Bresnick, a research fellow at Georgetown's Center for Security and Emerging Technology. "I see this as proof that China is totally uncomfortable with the idea of letting its own burgeoning chip industry be swamped by Nvidia."
The real damage may stem from the whiplash in Washington, where policymakers have sent mixed signals about what the US wants to accomplish with chip controls. By allowing some Chinese companies to buy H200 chips, the US may inadvertently embolden Beijing's efforts to develop its own AI capabilities.
As one official noted last week, "The worst possible thing we can do is just go back and forth." The situation is now a matter of waiting and seeing how this new policy plays out, with implications for global chip markets and national security that are still far from clear.
The move marks a significant shift in US policy on the export of sensitive technology to China, where concerns over national security have long dominated discussions. But after years of tensions between Washington and Beijing, it appears that the Trump administration's "strategic patience" approach has finally borne fruit.
Under President Trump, White House officials have been secretly working with Nvidia CEO Jensen Huang to find a way to allow some Chinese companies to buy US-made chips without compromising national security concerns. The idea was to strike a balance between keeping China dependent on US technology and preventing the country from developing its own powerful AI systems.
The new policy has sparked a mixed reaction in Washington, where some experts say it may ultimately prove counterproductive. By allowing domestic companies to buy H200 chips, Beijing is now able to achieve two strategic goals at once: getting access to top-notch compute power for training advanced AI models, while keeping the demand for Huawei chips high and encouraging China's domestic semiconductor industry to continue growing.
"This David Sacks idea of keeping China hooked on American technology is just not how this is going to go," says Samuel Bresnick, a research fellow at Georgetown's Center for Security and Emerging Technology. "I see this as proof that China is totally uncomfortable with the idea of letting its own burgeoning chip industry be swamped by Nvidia."
The real damage may stem from the whiplash in Washington, where policymakers have sent mixed signals about what the US wants to accomplish with chip controls. By allowing some Chinese companies to buy H200 chips, the US may inadvertently embolden Beijing's efforts to develop its own AI capabilities.
As one official noted last week, "The worst possible thing we can do is just go back and forth." The situation is now a matter of waiting and seeing how this new policy plays out, with implications for global chip markets and national security that are still far from clear.