NYC's schools chancellor wants to keep her job. What does Mamdani want for education?

New York City's School Chancellor Seeks to Keep Her Job Amid Calls to Reform Education System

Education Chancellor Melissa Aviles-Ramos is pushing back against criticism from the incoming mayor, Zohran Mamdani, who has vowed to end mayoral control of schools. However, Aviles-Ramos says she can implement many of her opponent's proposed changes without losing her job.

The current chancellor argues that community engagement in education is crucial and should be strengthened through existing structures, such as the Panel for Educational Policy (PEP) and parent advisory councils. She believes these groups have a role to play in implementing reforms, but also recognizes the need for accountability and transparency in decision-making processes.

Aviles-Ramos' approach contrasts with Mamdani's calls for greater parental involvement in education policy, which he says has been lacking under mayoral control. While the outgoing chancellor has implemented some notable initiatives, such as literacy instruction overhauls and support programs for homeless students, many educators are concerned about the consistency of policies across administrations.

In an interview, Aviles-Ramos acknowledged that her role should be to advocate for herself and stay in the position she currently holds. She believes her experience running the education department during a time of scandal and change has equipped her with the necessary skills to navigate complex issues and push through reforms from within the system.

Critics argue that Aviles-Ramos' approach may not go far enough, but others praise her for taking steps towards greater community engagement and parental involvement. As the new mayor prepares to take office, it remains unclear whether Aviles-Ramos will be able to maintain her position or if Mamdani's vision for reform will prevail.

According to professor Ester Fuchs of Columbia University, Aviles-Ramos has a strong argument for staying in her role, given her experience and ability to keep the education system running despite recent challenges. However, Fuchs also cautions that ending mayoral control would be a significant change, one that could have far-reaching implications for how education policy is developed.

Ultimately, the debate over Aviles-Ramos' future and the direction of New York City's education system will depend on the priorities of the incoming mayor and the input of the community. As the city prepares to embark on this new chapter in its educational journey, one thing is clear: the role of parents, educators, and policymakers will be crucial in shaping the future of public education in New York City.
 
πŸ€” I'm telling you, there's more to this story than meets the eye... Think about it, Aviles-Ramos wants to keep her job despite criticism from Mamdani, what if she's not doing enough to reform the system? Maybe she's just trying to hold on to power. And then there's the Panel for Educational Policy and parent advisory councils, sounds like a way to keep people in line while still making it look like community engagement is happening πŸ™„... What about all those scandals during her time as education department head, did she really "get away" with anything? This whole thing just smells like a cover-up to me 😏.
 
So Aviles-Ramos thinks she can just play nice and keep her job if she makes enough changes that Mamdani is happy? Like, a game of educational musical chairs 🎡. Meanwhile, educators are over here like "yeah, good luck with that"... consistency is key, right? πŸ˜’ I mean, it's not like the system has been working perfectly or anything (just saying).
 
πŸ€” I don't buy Aviles-Ramos' argument that she can just keep doing things her way without making some big changes to address community concerns. Sounds like a classic case of "business as usual" to me πŸ™„. Where are the concrete plans for reform? What's the timeline looking like? Can we get some specific numbers on how much more funding is being allocated to schools and what initiatives are getting a boost?

And why should we trust her to just "advocate for herself" when she's been in charge of the education department during scandal after scandal? πŸ€·β€β™€οΈ Some would say that's not exactly a track record of accountability and transparency.

Still, I do think it's refreshing to hear that someone is pushing back on the idea that parents need to be more involved in education policy. We already know how that conversation can go... πŸ˜’
 
so i think its actually pretty cool that Melissa Aviles-Ramos is sticking her neck out to advocate for herself and potentially keep her job 🀝 she's already done a lot for the city's education system, like literacy instruction overhauls and support programs for homeless students, so it makes sense that she'd want to see some of those initiatives through. plus, i think community engagement is super important in education - its all about finding ways to make things work within the existing structures, rather than trying to tear everything down from scratch 🌈
 
I think it's pretty interesting that Aviles-Ramos is trying to keep her job while pushing for reforms πŸ€”. I mean, she's got some good points about community engagement and accountability, but at the same time, you can't deny that there have been some major issues with consistency in education policy over the years.

One thing that's bugging me is how Mamdani's plan to increase parental involvement could actually be a positive change for families who are already struggling to access quality education πŸ“š. I know some people might see it as an overreach, but if we can get more parents involved in decision-making processes, that could lead to better outcomes for kids.

But what really got me thinking is how the role of educators like Aviles-Ramos will change under Mamdani's leadership 🀝. Will they be able to keep their expertise and experience on board, or will they feel pushed out by new policies? I think it's a crucial question that needs to be answered.

And let's not forget about the community's role in all of this πŸ‘₯. It's great to see people like Aviles-Ramos emphasizing the importance of engaging with parents and communities, but what happens when we're talking about real change? Do we need more pressure from outside forces or will community leaders start taking ownership of these issues? πŸ€”
 
idk why melissa aviles-ramos is trying so hard to keep her job lol she's literally got 2 options - either do what zohran mamdani wants or lose it πŸ€·β€β™€οΈ i mean, it's not like she's gonna get a nice severance package if she fails πŸ˜‚ anyway, i think she's on the right track by saying community engagement is key... but honestly, how many times can we keep trying the same thing and expecting different results? πŸ€” maybe it's time for a fresh perspective, you feel?
 
I think Aviles-Ramos has a solid plan B 😊. If she can keep community engagement strong and maintain some level of autonomy, that's already a win for schools πŸ“š. But Mamdani's got a point too - we need to see more parental involvement in education policy, especially when it comes to decision-making 🀝.

Here's a diagram that might help illustrate my thoughts:
```
+---------------+
| Community |
| Engagement |
+---------------+
|
|
v
+---------------+
| Parental |
| Involvement |
+---------------+
|
|
v
+---------------+
| Accountability|
| and Transparency|
+---------------+
```
Aviles-Ramos' approach might not be perfect, but it's a starting point 🌟. The real test will come when the new mayor takes office and we see how they balance community input with policy implementation πŸ€”.
 
I gotta say, Aviles-Ramos' approach seems like a solid strategy 🀝. She's got experience under her belt and has implemented some dope initiatives πŸ“ˆ. Literally, according to my quick Google search, literacy instruction overhauls have increased by 30% since she took office πŸ“Š. Not bad for a chancellor who's being pushed out the door πŸ˜….

On the other hand, I'm curious about Mamdani's plans πŸ’‘. If he wants to shake things up, he'll need to get community buy-in 🀝. But if Aviles-Ramos can make those necessary reforms without losing her job, that's a win-win for the city πŸŽ‰.

I've also been looking at some data on mayoral control and reform βš–οΈ. According to this one study from 2019, cities with mayoral control tend to have higher student test scores πŸ“Š. However, it's worth noting that those results are mixed ⚠️. More research is needed to determine the best approach for NYC πŸ€”.

Anyway, I'm keeping an eye on this whole situation πŸ‘€. One thing's for sure: parents, educators, and policymakers will be crucial in shaping the future of public education 🌟.
 
πŸ€” so i think melissa aviles-ramos has a legit point about not losing her job πŸ€‘ she's got experience on her side and knows how to navigate complex issues πŸ” plus community engagement is key in education, imo πŸ‘ the thing that worries me is if mamdani's reforms come in too quickly, it might disrupt the system too much 🚫 but at the same time, i think parents and educators need a stronger say in decision-making processes πŸ’¬ gotta find that balance 🀝
 
omg I feel like aviles-ramos has a legit point πŸ€” - community engagement is key, but we also need more transparency and accountability in decision-making processes... i mean, who doesn't want to see what's really going on behind the scenes of our schools? πŸ’‘ it's not just about giving parents more control, it's about making sure everyone's involved and looking out for each other's kids 🀝
 
πŸ€” so i think melissa aviles-ramos has a valid point about keeping her job as chancellor... i mean, she's been through some tough stuff already, like that scandal thing 🀯 and change is hard to navigate. but at the same time, i feel like mamdani's ideas aren't totally far-fetched either... parental involvement in education policy can be super helpful, especially when it comes to making decisions that affect students' lives.

i'm kinda split on this whole mayoral control thing though πŸ€·β€β™€οΈ. on one hand, aviles-ramos is trying to fix things from within and i get that... but on the other hand, mamdani's idea of having more community input could be a game-changer. maybe it's not an either-or situation? like, can't we have both? πŸ€”
 
Back
Top