Perplexity, a leading provider of generative AI tools, has inked a multi-year licensing deal with Getty Images, marking a significant step forward in its efforts to integrate high-quality visual media into its search and discovery platform. Under the agreement, Perplexity will leverage Getty's vast library of stock and editorial imagery, which includes millions of images, to enhance its AI-driven features.
As part of the partnership, Perplexity has committed to displaying image credits with links to their original sources, a move intended to educate users on how to use licensed images legally. This is a crucial step in addressing concerns around copyright and attribution that have been a thorn in the side of AI companies like Perplexity.
These issues have come under scrutiny in recent months, particularly as AI tools become increasingly accessible. The company has faced lawsuits over allegations of copying and storing article content without proper crediting or licensing. In August, it was sued by two Japanese media groups for allegedly infringing on their copyrights and providing inaccurate attribution.
Perplexity's struggles with copyright law are not new, however. In 2022, Getty Images banned AI-generated art from its platform due to the complexities surrounding intellectual property rights. The company later took action against an AI art tool called Stable Diffusion, alleging that it had copied millions of protected images from Getty's collection.
With this partnership, Getty is hoping to promote a more reliable and engaging user experience by supporting high-quality information delivery through Perplexity's platform. According to Nick Unsworth, Vice President Strategic Development at Getty Images, "partnerships such as this support AI platforms in increasing the accuracy and quality of the information delivered to consumers."
As part of the partnership, Perplexity has committed to displaying image credits with links to their original sources, a move intended to educate users on how to use licensed images legally. This is a crucial step in addressing concerns around copyright and attribution that have been a thorn in the side of AI companies like Perplexity.
These issues have come under scrutiny in recent months, particularly as AI tools become increasingly accessible. The company has faced lawsuits over allegations of copying and storing article content without proper crediting or licensing. In August, it was sued by two Japanese media groups for allegedly infringing on their copyrights and providing inaccurate attribution.
Perplexity's struggles with copyright law are not new, however. In 2022, Getty Images banned AI-generated art from its platform due to the complexities surrounding intellectual property rights. The company later took action against an AI art tool called Stable Diffusion, alleging that it had copied millions of protected images from Getty's collection.
With this partnership, Getty is hoping to promote a more reliable and engaging user experience by supporting high-quality information delivery through Perplexity's platform. According to Nick Unsworth, Vice President Strategic Development at Getty Images, "partnerships such as this support AI platforms in increasing the accuracy and quality of the information delivered to consumers."
. Can't we just have a platform that's transparent about what images it uses? Like, I get that Perplexity wants to use high-quality visuals, but why does Getty have to be the gatekeeper for everything? It's just making it harder for users like me to find reliable info without getting bogged down in copyright drama 
. And don't even get me started on image credits – I'm still waiting for someone to explain what that link is supposed to take me to 
. Can't we just have a simple "this image was licensed from Getty" label or something?
.
. They're already doing some cool stuff like generating art and whatnot, but adding high-quality visuals will take it to the next level 
. It's about time they addressed those copyright issues too 
- users should know where that sweet image is coming from 
. 
. It's about time we see some accountability from these AI companies when it comes to copyright and attribution issues. I mean, can you imagine using someone else's work without giving them the credit they deserve? 
That's just not cool.
. And who knows, maybe this will be a catalyst for other companies to follow suit 
.
. I just hope it doesn't lead to more lawsuits down the line 
. But overall, I think this is a win-win for users and creators alike 
.
. This Perplexity deal better not turn out to be another lawsuit fest 
. At least they're trying to do the right thing by giving users links to original sources... about time, if you ask me 
.
been hearing rumors about them copying images from Getty without crediting them properly 
and now they're gonna display those credits on their platform 
. I mean I get it from an ethical standpoint, but come on we live in the age of memes and AI-generated art is literally the future 
. Maybe it's time for us all to just accept that AI is gonna be everywhere and learn to navigate the nuances of copyright law 
.
Getty Images is just trying to cover their own tracks by partnering with them now. seems like copyright laws are still super confusing 
and now we got AI art getting banned too 
. It's all about transparency and accountability, you know? And I'm glad Getty Images is on board to help them out. This partnership is gonna bring some serious credibility to Perplexity's platform. Can't wait to see how it all shakes out! 
! And yay for credits and attribution links - it's so important for users to know where images come from 