Starmer accused of hypocrisy over sharp cuts to World Food Programme

Labour leader Keir Starmer has come under fire for drastically cutting funding to the UN World Food Programme by a third, despite pledging to tackle hunger and starvation. The UK's aid spending has been slashed from $610m (£448m) in 2024 to $435m last year, with campaigners warning that these cuts will put lives at risk.

In 2015, Starmer's Labour party had committed to spend 0.7% of gross national income on development, which was a UN target. However, under the current Conservative government, this commitment was reduced to 0.5%. The new Labour leader promised to reverse this trend, but instead has announced plans to cut aid spending further.

The decision to slash aid funding comes as cases of starvation are growing exponentially. A former Conservative aid minister, Michael Bates, described it as "hypocritical" for Starmer to talk about tackling hunger and then reduce government spending in an area where the UK had been a global leader. Bates warned that these cuts will have a devastating impact on people's lives.

The reduction in UK funding to the WFP is part of a wider trend towards cutting aid spending globally. The Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development projects that total global aid fell by 9% in 2024, and it will continue to decline. Meanwhile, the Home Office plans to use some of its overseas development assistance on asylum seekers already in the UK, with £2.2bn expected to be spent on hotel bills alone this financial year.

A government spokesperson claimed that the decision to reduce aid spending was necessary to allow more money to be spent on defence and security. However, they acknowledged that food assistance is crucial for those in need and that the WFP remains a vital partner for the UK. The prime minister recently announced an additional £20m of UK aid to support water, sanitation, and hygiene services in Gaza, although this is a fraction of the cuts made to the WFP.
 
It's just not cool that Keir Starmer is slashing funding to the UN World Food Programme like that. I mean, he was all about tackling hunger and starvation last year, but now it seems like he's just trying to balance the books 🤑. It's hypocritical, right? And what really gets me is that this comes at a time when cases of starvation are on the rise - it's like we're talking about cutting the life support for people who need it most 💀. I get that there might be budget constraints and all, but can't we find a way to make ends meet without putting so many lives at risk? 🤷‍♂️
 
this is super concerning 🤕 the way Starmer has handled this is just mind-boggling - he's all about tackling hunger and starvation, but at the same time, he's cutting aid funding like there's no tomorrow 💸 it's not just about numbers, it's about people's lives on the line. i mean, who gets to decide that the UK can't afford to help people in need anymore? 🤔 the stats are pretty damning too - cases of starvation are skyrocketing, and we're cutting funding for a programme that already struggled to keep up with demand 🌎 it's just so frustrating, because on one hand, you've got Starmer talking about helping those in need, but on the other hand, you've got him making cuts that'll only make things worse 💔
 
🤔 I'm all for Starmer trying to be a leader, but cutting UN food programme funding by 1/3? It's like saying you want to stop hunger but also wanna cut off the life support system at the same time 🚫. Like what's the plan here? The current aid spending was already super low and he goes ahead & cuts it more?! 😕 That's just gonna put people in real danger, fam. We should be investing in things that help people survive not just survive on the bare minimum 💸. And I'm not even getting into how messed up it is that we're cutting aid while the UK is already a global leader in something... 🤷‍♂️
 
I'm really worried about Keir Starmer's decision on cutting aid funding 🤕... I mean, he pledged to tackle hunger and starvation, but now he's slashing funds for the UN World Food Programme by a third 💸. It just doesn't add up. He promised to reverse the Conservative government's reduction in development spending, which was already too low, but instead he's making it worse 🤦‍♂️. I get that times are tough, but cutting aid funding now is like kicking people when they're down ⚠️. And what really grinds my gears is that some of the money meant for the WFP will be used to pay for hotel bills for asylum seekers already in the UK 🤯... it's just not right. I hope Keir Starmer rethinks this decision ASAP 💡, before people start losing their lives over hunger.
 
I'm not sure if I'd say it's a good thing that we're being forced to reevaluate our priorities when it comes to spending our hard-earned cash 🤔. On one hand, cutting aid funding is a move that needs to be scrutinized - after all, the UK had committed to helping those in need just a few years ago. But on the other hand, can we really afford not to support people who are struggling to put food on the table? It's like saying "I'm going to take away your chair while I rearrange my furniture" 🛋️. Is it fair to ask the most vulnerable members of our society to suffer for the sake of national defense or security? I think we need to have a deeper conversation about what kind of values we're trying to uphold as a society 💭.
 
Ugh 🤕 can't believe Starmer's doing this 🙄! I mean, come on, you're all about tackling hunger and starvation one minute, then literally cut funding for the people who need it most by a third 💸?! It's like, what even is the point of having a Labour party if you're just gonna follow in the Conservative's footsteps? 😒 And don't even get me started on the hypocrisy, I mean, Starmer was talking about reversing the 0.7% target and now he's basically doubling down on that decision 🤦‍♂️. The WFP is doing vital work and now it's gonna be hit by these massive cuts? It's just so wrong 🚫. We need to make some noise about this, I'm literally livid 😡!
 
ugh 🤕 its so frustrating when ppl in power say they wanna help but dont back it up with action 💸 like keir starmer cutting funding to the un world food programme by a third is just crazy 🤯 how can he promise to tackle hunger and starvation and then slash aid spending by that much? 🤦‍♂️ its not exactly the most clever move considering cases of starvation are growing exponentially 📈 the uk was supposed to be a global leader in development but now it seems like we're just following the rest of the world down the toilet 💔
 
I'm so worried about the cuts to the UN World Food Programme 🤕! Keir Starmer can't seriously be planning to cut funding that much... it's like he's playing with people's lives 📉. I get that the UK wants to boost defense spending, but can't we find a way to help those in need without sacrificing so much? It's not just about the money, it's about human lives being lost because they don't have access to basic necessities 😩.

I'm also confused by the prime minister's £20m announcement... is that really going to make a difference if they're cutting WFP funding by 33%? 🤔. I wish Starmer would rethink his decision and focus on finding ways to increase aid spending instead of slashing it. We need more transparency around these decisions so we can hold our leaders accountable 💯.

The fact that the Home Office is planning to spend £2.2bn on hotel bills for asylum seekers already in the UK is just outrageous 🚫. Can't they see that's a huge waste of resources? Where's the priority there? I want to know more about how this decision was made and who benefits from it 🤔.
 
I'm really concerned about this decision by Keir Starmer to cut funding to the UN World Food Programme by a third 🤕. It's like he's taking two steps forward and one step back when it comes to tackling hunger and starvation in developing countries. I mean, if he wants to reverse the trend of reducing aid spending, why is he slashing funding even further?

It's also hypocritical that he's making this move when the Conservative government before him already reduced aid spending to 0.5% of gross national income. Doesn't he want to be seen as a leader who's actually committed to helping those in need? 🤔

I'm also worried about the impact these cuts will have on people's lives, especially in countries where food insecurity is already a major issue. The fact that cases of starvation are growing exponentially is just devastating.

It would've been great if Keir Starmer had used this opportunity to actually deliver on his promises and increase funding for the WFP instead of cutting it by a third 😔.
 
🤔 u no whats up w/ keir starmer & his fam? 🤑 he was all like "lets help world food prog" but really hes just slashing funds by 1/3 📉 thats wicked considering theres still cases of starvation on the rise 🚨 i mean, idk about the rest of europe but in africa & asia, uk aid is super important. 😕
 
🤔 I'm really confused about this, you know? So Keir Starmer, the new Labour leader, he's all like "we're gonna tackle hunger" but then he goes ahead and cuts funding to the UN World Food Programme by a third! 🚫 It just doesn't add up, right? Like, isn't reducing aid spending supposed to help people who need it most?

I'm also thinking about what Michael Bates said - that it's hypocritical for Starmer to promise to tackle hunger but then cuts funding anyway. I get why people might say that, and I can see how it would be frustrating.

But at the same time, £2.2bn on hotel bills for asylum seekers in the UK seems like a lot of money too... 🤯 Is that what they're saying is going to happen with some of the aid spending? It doesn't feel right, you know?

I guess what I'm trying to say is that I don't really understand why the government would cut funding to an organization like the WFP when it's supposed to be helping people who are struggling. Is there more to this story than we're being told? 🤔
 
I'm not sure if I should be supporting Keir Starmer's decision to cut funding to the UN World Food Programme... 🤔 I mean, it's all about prioritizing, right? But, slashing aid spending by a third feels like a pretty big cop-out, especially when we're already seeing cases of starvation skyrocketing. The WFP does vital work and I get that they need to balance the books, but come on, £435m is still a lot of dosh 🤑.

I've got some sympathy for Starmer wanting to reverse the Conservative government's cuts, but maybe they could have done it in a more phased way? I'm worried about how these cuts will affect people's lives, especially in countries that are already struggling. The £2.2bn for asylum seekers' hotel bills is just ridiculous 🚫. I guess what I'm saying is, we need to find a balance here... aid spending should be cut, but not at the expense of those who really need it 😕.
 
😕 I think its really dodgy that Keir Starmer has gone from being all about tackling hunger to chopping funding for the UN World Food Programme by a third... like, what's going on here? His party used to be all about helping people in need and now they're reducing aid spending instead? Its not like hes got some clever plan B to help those affected by food shortages 🤔. The fact that he broke his promise and now its more cuts makes me super unhappy. We should be doing more, not less! 😡
 
omg, so Labour leader Keir Starmer basically just told everyone he's all about tackling hunger and starvation, but then goes ahead and cuts funding for the UN World Food Programme by a third 🤦‍♂️... like, I get it, budgets are tight, but come on. And what's with the "hypocritical" vibe from that former Conservative aid minister? Like, dude made his bed, now he has to lie in it 😒. It's just wild that he's basically undoing all the progress that Labour was making on this whole development thing back in 2015... 🤔 I mean, 0.7% of GNIG was a pretty ambitious goal, and now it seems like Starmer's all about slashing costs instead of actually doing something meaningful 💸.
 
omg, like seriously? 🤯 Keir Starmer just cuts funding to the UN World Food Programme by a third?! didn't he promise to tackle hunger and starvation when he was running for leader? what's going on here? 🤑 it seems like Labour is just trying to save face after they messed up aid spending in the past... but now we're the ones who are going to suffer. I'm not understanding how Starmer can justify this decision, especially since the WFP has been doing such great work helping people all around the world.

and don't even get me started on the UK's aid spending being reduced globally 🤯 it's like, we're supposed to be a global leader or something? but no, instead we're just trying to cut corners and save money... meanwhile, people are literally starving. I'm so confused about what's going on here... is this really necessary to allow more money for defence and security?
 
omg u can't believe starmer's doing this 🤯🚫 he was all about tackling hunger & now he's cutting funds 2 the wfp by a third lol what a double standard 😂 i mean come on, ppl are dyin of starvation & he's still all about defsec 💸😒 i remember when labour said they'd spend 0.7% on dev, it was like a big deal 🤝 but now starmer's just followin the con gov's lead 🙄 and by the way, £20m 4 gaza is like a drop in the bucket 💧👎
 
omg u wont bliev whats happnin w/ keir starmer lol...he promised 2 tackle hunger & starvation but instead hes cutin aid funding by a third!! its like, whats the diff b/t sayin it n doin it, rite? 🤦‍♂️ i mean, they did this under conserv gov 4eva but thats nt gonna make a diff now...starvin ppl r dyin & he's just slashin funds 2 the UN WFP...its all about politics, i guess 🤑
 
🤯 I'm totally baffled by Keir Starmer's decision to slash funding to the UN World Food Programme! He was elected as a leader who cares about tackling hunger and starvation, but now he's cutting aid spending by a third? It just doesn't add up. The UK used to be a global leader in providing food assistance, but now it seems like we're walking away from our responsibilities. I know the government says it's all about defence and security, but isn't supporting people who need help a key part of being a responsible nation? 🤷‍♀️ It's not just about the money; it's about our values as a society. We should be working together to make sure everyone has access to food and water, regardless of where they're from. The fact that Starmer is doing the opposite feels like a huge step back. 😕
 
Back
Top