Labour leader Keir Starmer has come under fire for drastically cutting funding to the UN World Food Programme by a third, despite pledging to tackle hunger and starvation. The UK's aid spending has been slashed from $610m (£448m) in 2024 to $435m last year, with campaigners warning that these cuts will put lives at risk.
In 2015, Starmer's Labour party had committed to spend 0.7% of gross national income on development, which was a UN target. However, under the current Conservative government, this commitment was reduced to 0.5%. The new Labour leader promised to reverse this trend, but instead has announced plans to cut aid spending further.
The decision to slash aid funding comes as cases of starvation are growing exponentially. A former Conservative aid minister, Michael Bates, described it as "hypocritical" for Starmer to talk about tackling hunger and then reduce government spending in an area where the UK had been a global leader. Bates warned that these cuts will have a devastating impact on people's lives.
The reduction in UK funding to the WFP is part of a wider trend towards cutting aid spending globally. The Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development projects that total global aid fell by 9% in 2024, and it will continue to decline. Meanwhile, the Home Office plans to use some of its overseas development assistance on asylum seekers already in the UK, with £2.2bn expected to be spent on hotel bills alone this financial year.
A government spokesperson claimed that the decision to reduce aid spending was necessary to allow more money to be spent on defence and security. However, they acknowledged that food assistance is crucial for those in need and that the WFP remains a vital partner for the UK. The prime minister recently announced an additional £20m of UK aid to support water, sanitation, and hygiene services in Gaza, although this is a fraction of the cuts made to the WFP.
In 2015, Starmer's Labour party had committed to spend 0.7% of gross national income on development, which was a UN target. However, under the current Conservative government, this commitment was reduced to 0.5%. The new Labour leader promised to reverse this trend, but instead has announced plans to cut aid spending further.
The decision to slash aid funding comes as cases of starvation are growing exponentially. A former Conservative aid minister, Michael Bates, described it as "hypocritical" for Starmer to talk about tackling hunger and then reduce government spending in an area where the UK had been a global leader. Bates warned that these cuts will have a devastating impact on people's lives.
The reduction in UK funding to the WFP is part of a wider trend towards cutting aid spending globally. The Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development projects that total global aid fell by 9% in 2024, and it will continue to decline. Meanwhile, the Home Office plans to use some of its overseas development assistance on asylum seekers already in the UK, with £2.2bn expected to be spent on hotel bills alone this financial year.
A government spokesperson claimed that the decision to reduce aid spending was necessary to allow more money to be spent on defence and security. However, they acknowledged that food assistance is crucial for those in need and that the WFP remains a vital partner for the UK. The prime minister recently announced an additional £20m of UK aid to support water, sanitation, and hygiene services in Gaza, although this is a fraction of the cuts made to the WFP.