The attacks on TikTok were never about fears of China or the Communist Party's (CCP) nefarious intentions. Rather, they are a thinly veiled attempt at protectionism for American companies that failed to innovate and adapt in the face of global competition.
The notion that TikTok's Chinese ownership poses a significant threat to national security is an overblown myth. The reality is that China remains one of the poorest countries in the world, with a fledgling venture capital industry that cannot compare to the United States. When TikTok opened its doors in 2016, it was already heavily invested in American tech startups, making it essentially an American-owned company.
Critics claim that Chinese ownership would force TikTok to conduct surveillance on US citizens and collect user data for nefarious purposes. However, this assertion fails to account for the fact that China's own surveillance capabilities are far more extensive than anything TikTok could provide. Moreover, technology and social media companies in the United States already possess the means to track user communications, online activities, and interests.
The claim that TikTok's "sophisticated algorithm" could be used to disseminate propaganda is equally baseless. The fact that China has a long history of propagandizing its people does not imply that an American-owned company like TikTok would engage in such behavior. Furthermore, the notion that the US relies on TikTok for propaganda dissemination is laughable, given the existence of freedom and prosperity โ the ultimate form of propaganda.
In reality, the risks to the US are not posed by TikTok or the CCP but rather by the punditry and political class eager to demonize China and stifle global competition. By attacking TikTok under the guise of national security concerns, these individuals are merely protecting American interests in a shrinking world where innovation and adaptability are essential for success.
The irony is that if anyone needs surveillance on US citizens, it's already happening through technology companies at home. The real question is why TikTok's owners would risk substantial investment capital by blithely cooperating with the CCP, when they could easily prevent such collaboration in the first place.
Ultimately, the attacks on TikTok serve as a reminder that protectionism and nationalism can be used to shield domestic interests from legitimate competition. By choosing to demonize China rather than confronting our own shortcomings, we risk losing out on opportunities for growth and innovation.
The notion that TikTok's Chinese ownership poses a significant threat to national security is an overblown myth. The reality is that China remains one of the poorest countries in the world, with a fledgling venture capital industry that cannot compare to the United States. When TikTok opened its doors in 2016, it was already heavily invested in American tech startups, making it essentially an American-owned company.
Critics claim that Chinese ownership would force TikTok to conduct surveillance on US citizens and collect user data for nefarious purposes. However, this assertion fails to account for the fact that China's own surveillance capabilities are far more extensive than anything TikTok could provide. Moreover, technology and social media companies in the United States already possess the means to track user communications, online activities, and interests.
The claim that TikTok's "sophisticated algorithm" could be used to disseminate propaganda is equally baseless. The fact that China has a long history of propagandizing its people does not imply that an American-owned company like TikTok would engage in such behavior. Furthermore, the notion that the US relies on TikTok for propaganda dissemination is laughable, given the existence of freedom and prosperity โ the ultimate form of propaganda.
In reality, the risks to the US are not posed by TikTok or the CCP but rather by the punditry and political class eager to demonize China and stifle global competition. By attacking TikTok under the guise of national security concerns, these individuals are merely protecting American interests in a shrinking world where innovation and adaptability are essential for success.
The irony is that if anyone needs surveillance on US citizens, it's already happening through technology companies at home. The real question is why TikTok's owners would risk substantial investment capital by blithely cooperating with the CCP, when they could easily prevent such collaboration in the first place.
Ultimately, the attacks on TikTok serve as a reminder that protectionism and nationalism can be used to shield domestic interests from legitimate competition. By choosing to demonize China rather than confronting our own shortcomings, we risk losing out on opportunities for growth and innovation.