Britain's Banks: A Windfall Tax Could Be Just What the Doctor Ordered
As the UK government prepares for its annual budget, lobbyists are in full swing, lobbying hard to keep bank profits untaxed. On Westminster Bridge, a group of protesters donned masks of top banking CEOs, urging the government to introduce a windfall tax on domestic profits. With inflation soaring and costs skyrocketing, it's high time for the banks to contribute.
The Tories may have taken a 35% energy profits levy in 2022, but why not extend that same logic to the UK's biggest banks? After all, they're making record-breaking profits without any extra effort. UK Finance, the lobby group representing British banks, argues that such a tax would damage competitiveness with foreign banks. Nonsense, say campaigners. Any tax on retail profits would only hit UK residents, not offshore operations.
This is no ordinary lobbying effort. The stakes are high, and the rhetoric is dire. Lobbyists threaten dire consequences if any new tax is proposed. Meanwhile, the right-wing media amplifies these warnings, painting a bleak picture of economic doom. But who's really being listened to?
Gambling, in particular, has become the public's most popular target. A 50% tax on gambling could raise £3.2bn, according to the IPPR. Yet, the industry is fighting back, claiming Gordon Brown's support for a similar tax rise was "economically reckless." The betting and gambling council warns of 40,000 job losses if such a tax is introduced.
Meanwhile, property taxes are seen as chaotically unjust. Estate agents protest against any suggestion of a mansion tax, warning it would breed a stagnant housing market. But experts debunk these claims, pointing out that reforming business rates could revive high streets by charging big supermarkets more, while abolishing rates for local independents could fill empty shops.
The only taxes that the public currently supports are those on the rich and high earners – but not "ordinary people" or pensioners. There's a divide between those who want to tax the wealthy and those who don't. The chancellor is caught in this dilemma, needing to balance economic growth with fairness.
Rather than listening to expensive lobbyists, she needs to close her ears to their cacophony and trust her own judgment. With her party sitting at 17% in the polls, what's there to lose? Perhaps it's time for a tax that would benefit the long-term good, taking the fairest path for all – not just the wealthy few.
As the UK government prepares for its annual budget, lobbyists are in full swing, lobbying hard to keep bank profits untaxed. On Westminster Bridge, a group of protesters donned masks of top banking CEOs, urging the government to introduce a windfall tax on domestic profits. With inflation soaring and costs skyrocketing, it's high time for the banks to contribute.
The Tories may have taken a 35% energy profits levy in 2022, but why not extend that same logic to the UK's biggest banks? After all, they're making record-breaking profits without any extra effort. UK Finance, the lobby group representing British banks, argues that such a tax would damage competitiveness with foreign banks. Nonsense, say campaigners. Any tax on retail profits would only hit UK residents, not offshore operations.
This is no ordinary lobbying effort. The stakes are high, and the rhetoric is dire. Lobbyists threaten dire consequences if any new tax is proposed. Meanwhile, the right-wing media amplifies these warnings, painting a bleak picture of economic doom. But who's really being listened to?
Gambling, in particular, has become the public's most popular target. A 50% tax on gambling could raise £3.2bn, according to the IPPR. Yet, the industry is fighting back, claiming Gordon Brown's support for a similar tax rise was "economically reckless." The betting and gambling council warns of 40,000 job losses if such a tax is introduced.
Meanwhile, property taxes are seen as chaotically unjust. Estate agents protest against any suggestion of a mansion tax, warning it would breed a stagnant housing market. But experts debunk these claims, pointing out that reforming business rates could revive high streets by charging big supermarkets more, while abolishing rates for local independents could fill empty shops.
The only taxes that the public currently supports are those on the rich and high earners – but not "ordinary people" or pensioners. There's a divide between those who want to tax the wealthy and those who don't. The chancellor is caught in this dilemma, needing to balance economic growth with fairness.
Rather than listening to expensive lobbyists, she needs to close her ears to their cacophony and trust her own judgment. With her party sitting at 17% in the polls, what's there to lose? Perhaps it's time for a tax that would benefit the long-term good, taking the fairest path for all – not just the wealthy few.