The Trump Nominee for Surgeon General: A Recipe for Disaster?
As the nation awaits the confirmation of Casey Means, President Donald Trump's nominee for surgeon general, medical experts are sounding the alarm on her questionable qualifications and advocacy for unproven health practices.
Means, a wellness influencer and entrepreneur, has been praised by Trump as having "impeccable 'MAHA' credentials," but critics argue that she lacks the necessary medical expertise to hold the nation's top public health post. Despite attending medical school and dropping out during her surgical residency, Means is largely self-taught in the field of medicine.
Dr. Ryan Marino, a board-certified physician, has expressed deep concerns about Means' nomination, citing her anti-vaccine sentiments, her advocacy for "functional medicine," which he describes as "quackery." The latter refers to unproven and disproven practices that have no scientific basis, but are instead based on pseudoscientific theories.
Means' background in functional medicine is particularly concerning, given its track record of promoting untested treatments and products. Her endorsement of continuous glucose monitors for people who don't need them, as well as her criticism of vaccinations like the hepatitis B vaccine, have raised eyebrows among experts. The latter vaccine has been credited with preventing millions of deaths worldwide.
Critics also point to Means' financial ties to supplement companies and medical device manufacturers, which could create a conflict of interest in her role as surgeon general. She has invested in companies like Altria Group and Philip Morris International, two tobacco giants, despite claiming that she would divest from such investments if confirmed.
The concern is not just about Means' personal motivations, but also about the potential influence she could wield over public health policy. As a prominent figure, she could shape the narrative around alternative medicine and promote unproven treatments to the American public.
Experts warn that her advocacy for organic produce could have serious consequences for consumers. While the idea of eating organic may seem appealing, it is often impractical and expensive. Moreover, some pesticides used in conventional farming are actually more effective and safer than their organic counterparts.
Emily Bass, director of Federal Policy, Food and Agriculture at the Breakthrough Institute, notes that the conversion to an all-organic food system could lead to higher prices for consumers and environmental degradation. "If she moves into this position and uses that platform to tell everyday Americans they should be scared of conventionally-grown food, there's no reason to not expect that to have ripple effects into the market," Bass said.
The nomination of Casey Means as surgeon general raises serious questions about the nation's public health infrastructure. As a prominent figure, she could shape policy and influence the American public in ways that are detrimental to their health and well-being. It is imperative that the Senate scrutinizes her nomination closely and ensures that she has the necessary qualifications and expertise to hold this critical position.
In the end, it is not just about Means' personal views or financial ties; it is about the potential consequences of her advocacy for unproven health practices and alternative medicine. The nation deserves a surgeon general who can provide evidence-based guidance on public health issues, rather than promoting pseudoscientific theories that put people's lives at risk.
As the nomination process unfolds, one thing is clear: the American public has a stake in ensuring that its top public health official is qualified, honest, and committed to serving their best interests. Anything less would be a recipe for disaster.
As the nation awaits the confirmation of Casey Means, President Donald Trump's nominee for surgeon general, medical experts are sounding the alarm on her questionable qualifications and advocacy for unproven health practices.
Means, a wellness influencer and entrepreneur, has been praised by Trump as having "impeccable 'MAHA' credentials," but critics argue that she lacks the necessary medical expertise to hold the nation's top public health post. Despite attending medical school and dropping out during her surgical residency, Means is largely self-taught in the field of medicine.
Dr. Ryan Marino, a board-certified physician, has expressed deep concerns about Means' nomination, citing her anti-vaccine sentiments, her advocacy for "functional medicine," which he describes as "quackery." The latter refers to unproven and disproven practices that have no scientific basis, but are instead based on pseudoscientific theories.
Means' background in functional medicine is particularly concerning, given its track record of promoting untested treatments and products. Her endorsement of continuous glucose monitors for people who don't need them, as well as her criticism of vaccinations like the hepatitis B vaccine, have raised eyebrows among experts. The latter vaccine has been credited with preventing millions of deaths worldwide.
Critics also point to Means' financial ties to supplement companies and medical device manufacturers, which could create a conflict of interest in her role as surgeon general. She has invested in companies like Altria Group and Philip Morris International, two tobacco giants, despite claiming that she would divest from such investments if confirmed.
The concern is not just about Means' personal motivations, but also about the potential influence she could wield over public health policy. As a prominent figure, she could shape the narrative around alternative medicine and promote unproven treatments to the American public.
Experts warn that her advocacy for organic produce could have serious consequences for consumers. While the idea of eating organic may seem appealing, it is often impractical and expensive. Moreover, some pesticides used in conventional farming are actually more effective and safer than their organic counterparts.
Emily Bass, director of Federal Policy, Food and Agriculture at the Breakthrough Institute, notes that the conversion to an all-organic food system could lead to higher prices for consumers and environmental degradation. "If she moves into this position and uses that platform to tell everyday Americans they should be scared of conventionally-grown food, there's no reason to not expect that to have ripple effects into the market," Bass said.
The nomination of Casey Means as surgeon general raises serious questions about the nation's public health infrastructure. As a prominent figure, she could shape policy and influence the American public in ways that are detrimental to their health and well-being. It is imperative that the Senate scrutinizes her nomination closely and ensures that she has the necessary qualifications and expertise to hold this critical position.
In the end, it is not just about Means' personal views or financial ties; it is about the potential consequences of her advocacy for unproven health practices and alternative medicine. The nation deserves a surgeon general who can provide evidence-based guidance on public health issues, rather than promoting pseudoscientific theories that put people's lives at risk.
As the nomination process unfolds, one thing is clear: the American public has a stake in ensuring that its top public health official is qualified, honest, and committed to serving their best interests. Anything less would be a recipe for disaster.