TikTok Users' Fears About MAGA Makeover "Absolutely Justified," Experts Say.
The platform's shift to censor content critical of Donald Trump has sparked concerns that its new owners are aligning the app with right-wing views.
As technical issues continue to plague TikTok, users are increasingly deleting the app due to fears that it is being censored. While TikTok officials claim that errors blocking uploads of anti-ICE videos or direct messages mentioning Jeffrey Epstein are due to technical issues, experts say that users' fears about censorship are justified, even if the bugs are not intentional.
According to Ioana Literat, an associate professor of technology, media, and learning at Teachers College, Columbia University, users' fears are "absolutely justified" because the pattern of what's being suppressed reveals something significant. When anti-Trump content is consistently flagged, it suggests that the algorithm has been designed to suppress specific political content.
The platform's new owners have deep ties with Trump and his inner circle, which has raised concerns about their potential influence on the app's content moderation policies. David Greene, senior counsel for the Electronic Frontier Foundation, warned during the Supreme Court fight over the TikTok divest-or-ban law that forcing a sale could lead to the app being sold to "President's lackeys."
The risk of censorship is further exacerbated by TikTok's history of suppressing Palestine-related content and its transformation under Elon Musk. Users are no longer convinced that technical issues can explain the sudden suppression of anti-ICE videos or direct messages mentioning Jeffrey Epstein.
Experts say that users are likely to adapt to any changes in content moderation policies, but the damage to user trust has already been done. Literat fears that TikTok's role in political discourse will never be the same, and that it may suffer a similar fate to Twitter/X.
For now, the app's new owners seem more focused on fixing technical issues than making significant changes to its content moderation policies. As a result, users who are critical of Trump are likely to continue testing boundaries and documenting issues, which could lead to further chilling of speech on the platform.
The platform's shift to censor content critical of Donald Trump has sparked concerns that its new owners are aligning the app with right-wing views.
As technical issues continue to plague TikTok, users are increasingly deleting the app due to fears that it is being censored. While TikTok officials claim that errors blocking uploads of anti-ICE videos or direct messages mentioning Jeffrey Epstein are due to technical issues, experts say that users' fears about censorship are justified, even if the bugs are not intentional.
According to Ioana Literat, an associate professor of technology, media, and learning at Teachers College, Columbia University, users' fears are "absolutely justified" because the pattern of what's being suppressed reveals something significant. When anti-Trump content is consistently flagged, it suggests that the algorithm has been designed to suppress specific political content.
The platform's new owners have deep ties with Trump and his inner circle, which has raised concerns about their potential influence on the app's content moderation policies. David Greene, senior counsel for the Electronic Frontier Foundation, warned during the Supreme Court fight over the TikTok divest-or-ban law that forcing a sale could lead to the app being sold to "President's lackeys."
The risk of censorship is further exacerbated by TikTok's history of suppressing Palestine-related content and its transformation under Elon Musk. Users are no longer convinced that technical issues can explain the sudden suppression of anti-ICE videos or direct messages mentioning Jeffrey Epstein.
Experts say that users are likely to adapt to any changes in content moderation policies, but the damage to user trust has already been done. Literat fears that TikTok's role in political discourse will never be the same, and that it may suffer a similar fate to Twitter/X.
For now, the app's new owners seem more focused on fixing technical issues than making significant changes to its content moderation policies. As a result, users who are critical of Trump are likely to continue testing boundaries and documenting issues, which could lead to further chilling of speech on the platform.