Human Trafficking Victims of Diplomatic Exploitation in the UK Get Compensation Boost
A London high court has handed down a landmark ruling, ordering the United Arab Emirates to pay over £260,000 to a Filipino woman who was trafficked and exploited by a diplomat on British soil. The 35-year-old victim, who worked for the diplomat's family from 2012 until her escape in 2013, endured a regime of modern slavery-like conditions.
Locked away in their home for nearly three months without freedom or respite, she toiled for an average of over 17 hours a day, performing extensive domestic duties and caring for the children. Her wages were woefully inadequate - just £400 for 12 weeks of work. The family also denied her access to essential services like internet and a UK phone SIM card, leaving her completely isolated.
The UAE government chose not to attend court during the proceedings, while the diplomat himself remained absent from the judgment. Despite this, the court awarded significant damages to the victim in recognition of her suffering, including £262,292.76 for false imprisonment, emotional distress, and medical expenses related to a post-traumatic stress disorder diagnosis.
The judge's ruling was notable not only for its substantial financial compensation but also for its explicit condemnation of the diplomat's actions as "wrongful" and "cynical." This judgment serves as a rare example of international accountability for state-sponsored human trafficking cases in the UK.
A London high court has handed down a landmark ruling, ordering the United Arab Emirates to pay over £260,000 to a Filipino woman who was trafficked and exploited by a diplomat on British soil. The 35-year-old victim, who worked for the diplomat's family from 2012 until her escape in 2013, endured a regime of modern slavery-like conditions.
Locked away in their home for nearly three months without freedom or respite, she toiled for an average of over 17 hours a day, performing extensive domestic duties and caring for the children. Her wages were woefully inadequate - just £400 for 12 weeks of work. The family also denied her access to essential services like internet and a UK phone SIM card, leaving her completely isolated.
The UAE government chose not to attend court during the proceedings, while the diplomat himself remained absent from the judgment. Despite this, the court awarded significant damages to the victim in recognition of her suffering, including £262,292.76 for false imprisonment, emotional distress, and medical expenses related to a post-traumatic stress disorder diagnosis.
The judge's ruling was notable not only for its substantial financial compensation but also for its explicit condemnation of the diplomat's actions as "wrongful" and "cynical." This judgment serves as a rare example of international accountability for state-sponsored human trafficking cases in the UK.