Managerial Changes Are a Record-Breaker This Season
The latest managerial sackings at Wolves and Southampton have sent shockwaves through the Premier League, marking yet another instance of clubs resorting to drastic action in response to poor performances on the pitch. With 52 out of 94 English clubs changing managers since the summer of last year, it's becoming increasingly clear that the sacking season has truly kicked off.
The numbers are staggering, with Wolves' Vitor Pereira being axed just 11 months into his tenure, following a dismal run that saw the team take only two points from their first 10 games. This is not an isolated incident; in fact, it's part of a worrying trend. Since the start of the Premier League era, only 42.5% of clubs who have changed managers while sitting in the relegation zone have gone on to survive.
While the sacking of managers has been a staple of the football landscape for years, this season's numbers are alarmingly high. In fact, Premier League clubs are now on track to set a new record for managerial changes, surpassing the total of 14 in the 2022/23 campaign. With another 12 changes projected between now and the end of the campaign, it's clear that many clubs will be under intense pressure to make drastic changes if they're to avoid relegation.
But will these sackings truly pay off? History suggests otherwise. No manager has ever kept a club in the Premier League's bottom three up after taking over from March onwards. The later a club changes manager during the season, the lower its chances of survival tend to be. This is why Wolves, West Ham, and Nottingham Forest – all sides that have changed managers this season – are hoping to have boosted their survival prospects by making the move.
As the season wears on, it's clear that managerial sackings will continue to be a major talking point. But will these changes ultimately prove effective in turning teams around? Only time will tell.
The latest managerial sackings at Wolves and Southampton have sent shockwaves through the Premier League, marking yet another instance of clubs resorting to drastic action in response to poor performances on the pitch. With 52 out of 94 English clubs changing managers since the summer of last year, it's becoming increasingly clear that the sacking season has truly kicked off.
The numbers are staggering, with Wolves' Vitor Pereira being axed just 11 months into his tenure, following a dismal run that saw the team take only two points from their first 10 games. This is not an isolated incident; in fact, it's part of a worrying trend. Since the start of the Premier League era, only 42.5% of clubs who have changed managers while sitting in the relegation zone have gone on to survive.
While the sacking of managers has been a staple of the football landscape for years, this season's numbers are alarmingly high. In fact, Premier League clubs are now on track to set a new record for managerial changes, surpassing the total of 14 in the 2022/23 campaign. With another 12 changes projected between now and the end of the campaign, it's clear that many clubs will be under intense pressure to make drastic changes if they're to avoid relegation.
But will these sackings truly pay off? History suggests otherwise. No manager has ever kept a club in the Premier League's bottom three up after taking over from March onwards. The later a club changes manager during the season, the lower its chances of survival tend to be. This is why Wolves, West Ham, and Nottingham Forest – all sides that have changed managers this season – are hoping to have boosted their survival prospects by making the move.
As the season wears on, it's clear that managerial sackings will continue to be a major talking point. But will these changes ultimately prove effective in turning teams around? Only time will tell.
It seems like clubs are more focused on quick fixes rather than building sustainable teams. And let's be real, how many times can you replace a manager before it starts to affect the actual players? I mean, what's next? Sacking the whole squad every time they lose a game? 
It just seems like these sacking seasons are more about PR and keeping fans happy than actually improving the team. And the stats are pretty bleak – 42.5% of clubs that get sacked in relegation zone still go down, so what's changed this time around? 
. It's true that Wolves and Southampton got sacked, but it doesn't mean everyone else who did the same thing will fail miserably 
. I mean, teams are going to have ups and downs, and sometimes you gotta shake things up 
️. Vitor Pereira at Wolves might've been struggling, but it's not like he was getting paid millions to be a failure 
. And let's be real, 12 more managerial sackings before the end of the season is just part of the game 
. It doesn't mean anyone's doomed for relegation 
.
Remember when West Ham sacked their manager just 6 games into the season? It's like clubs are trying to break some sort of record for most changes in one go 
. But seriously, it's a worrying trend that if you're relegated, changing managers is no guarantee of survival... last season's stats showed that teams who changed managers between March and May had an even lower chance of staying up 
. I'm curious to see how this season plays out – will all these sackings lead to some sort of turnaround or just more drama? 
those 11 months must've been super tough for them, and now this is the third manager change...it's like they're stuck on a never-ending cycle of change! 
I'm not surprised though, poor teams need to shake things up, but it's gotta be hard for the players to adjust. And you know what? It's always interesting to see how these changes affect the team's morale and performance 
do you think some clubs are just being too cautious or trying to make a statement? 
. I think what's interesting is how teams are trying to do things differently now, like making the change in March instead of waiting until January... maybe that will make a difference 
According to the stats, only 57.1% of clubs who got new managers while in the relegation zone made it out. 
The trend is clear, sacking a manager doesn't always save the day... 
. I mean, we've seen what happens when teams make changes and still manage to get relegated... not pretty 
. It's all about momentum and chemistry, and those take time to build. Let's just hope some of these sackings actually do the trick 
...
.
. I'm not saying it never works out, but...I don't know, I just wish we could have a more nuanced conversation about why clubs are making these moves and what they're hoping to achieve 
and it's only november 
. Wolves' Vitor Pereira lasted just 11 months 
before being let go, which is crazy considering they paid him millions 
. i think its safe to say that the 'drastic action' approach isn't always the solution 
it's easy to fire someone when you're not getting results, but how many times have we seen a new manager come in and turn the team around in like 3-4 months? i reckon most of these sackings are just panic moves by owners who don't know what they want. 
but history is telling us that sometimes, changing managers isn't the answer, no matter how hard we wish it to be 
, I'm not surprised to see all these managerial sackings this season... it just goes to show how much clubs value short-term gains over long-term stability. It's like they're throwing money and resources at the problem without any real plan in place 
. i mean, wolves got rid of vitor pereira after just 11 months, which is insane considering he was only meant to be a temporary interim until a new boss was sorted. it's also really interesting to see how these sackings are affecting the teams that have made the changes - are they actually improving or just getting lucky? 
And don't even get me started on the timing - 11 months is way too early for Wolves to be sacked 
. We'll just have to wait and see if these sackings turn out to be some sort of magic solution or if we're stuck with another season of mediocrity 