Ai Weiwei's visit to China was a poignant reminder that even for those who have faced decades of authoritarian repression, returning home can be a bittersweet experience. For the 68-year-old artist, his first trip back in over a decade was more than just a personal journey; it was also a powerful statement about the complexities of censorship and the blurred lines between freedom and oppression.
Ai's decision to return to China was not made lightly. He had spent years living in exile, first in the West and then in Europe, after being detained for 81 days in a Chinese prison for his activism. The experience had left an indelible mark on him, with his captors warning him that his son would never recognize him upon his release. Yet, Ai chose to take a risk and return to his homeland, driven by a desire to reconnect with his family and reestablish ties to his roots.
Upon his arrival in China, Ai was struck by the familiar sights, sounds, and smells of his childhood. The journey felt like a "phone call suddenly reconnecting," as he so eloquently put it. However, this sense of comfort was tempered by a growing awareness of the complexities of censorship and surveillance that underpin modern Chinese society.
Ai's new book, On Censorship, is a scathing critique of the ways in which Western societies perpetuate their own forms of control, often masquerading as freedom. He argues that censorship is not exclusive to authoritarian regimes but is instead an indispensable tool of mental enslavement and a fundamental source of political corruption. In his view, even liberal democracies like Germany and the UK are guilty of this form of thought control.
One particular incident that Ai cites in his book highlights the subtlety and insidious nature of censorship in the West. He recounts how an exhibition at the Royal Academy was cancelled after he posted a tweet that some saw as anti-Semitic, despite his denials of such intentions. The episode serves as a case study in the corrosive effects of censorship, which can silence artists like Ai Weiwei who dare to challenge dominant narratives.
Ai's experiences serve as a powerful reminder that the struggle for freedom and self-expression is never truly won. Even in the West, where we pride ourselves on our liberal values, there are still forces at work that seek to stifle dissenting voices and control the narrative. For Ai Weiwei, returning home has not brought an end to this struggle; instead, it has made him more determined than ever to challenge the status quo.
As I reflect on Ai's words, I am left with a sense of unease about the world we are creating for ourselves. Is 2026 going to be a year where life becomes even more fractured and difficult to navigate? The artist's response, when asked how he feels about the world in 10 years, is characteristically nuanced: "If we were in the time of the Tang dynasty, someone like me would go back and write beautiful poetry. But not today. I just take a few selfies."
Ai's decision to return to China was not made lightly. He had spent years living in exile, first in the West and then in Europe, after being detained for 81 days in a Chinese prison for his activism. The experience had left an indelible mark on him, with his captors warning him that his son would never recognize him upon his release. Yet, Ai chose to take a risk and return to his homeland, driven by a desire to reconnect with his family and reestablish ties to his roots.
Upon his arrival in China, Ai was struck by the familiar sights, sounds, and smells of his childhood. The journey felt like a "phone call suddenly reconnecting," as he so eloquently put it. However, this sense of comfort was tempered by a growing awareness of the complexities of censorship and surveillance that underpin modern Chinese society.
Ai's new book, On Censorship, is a scathing critique of the ways in which Western societies perpetuate their own forms of control, often masquerading as freedom. He argues that censorship is not exclusive to authoritarian regimes but is instead an indispensable tool of mental enslavement and a fundamental source of political corruption. In his view, even liberal democracies like Germany and the UK are guilty of this form of thought control.
One particular incident that Ai cites in his book highlights the subtlety and insidious nature of censorship in the West. He recounts how an exhibition at the Royal Academy was cancelled after he posted a tweet that some saw as anti-Semitic, despite his denials of such intentions. The episode serves as a case study in the corrosive effects of censorship, which can silence artists like Ai Weiwei who dare to challenge dominant narratives.
Ai's experiences serve as a powerful reminder that the struggle for freedom and self-expression is never truly won. Even in the West, where we pride ourselves on our liberal values, there are still forces at work that seek to stifle dissenting voices and control the narrative. For Ai Weiwei, returning home has not brought an end to this struggle; instead, it has made him more determined than ever to challenge the status quo.
As I reflect on Ai's words, I am left with a sense of unease about the world we are creating for ourselves. Is 2026 going to be a year where life becomes even more fractured and difficult to navigate? The artist's response, when asked how he feels about the world in 10 years, is characteristically nuanced: "If we were in the time of the Tang dynasty, someone like me would go back and write beautiful poetry. But not today. I just take a few selfies."