The US Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) agency has a dismal record of accountability when it comes to its agents' use of deadly force. Over the past decade, at least 25 people have been killed by ICE agents in shootouts, and yet not a single agent has faced criminal charges. This staggering lack of accountability is a symptom of a broader problem: an entrenched culture of impunity that allows ICE agents to operate with relative impunity.
ICE's use-of-force policies are outdated and lack transparency. The agency operates under an interim policy from 2004, which was last reviewed by the DHS Inspector General's Office in 2023. However, the results of these reviews are not made public, and it is unclear whether any changes have been made to the policies since then.
The case of Renee Nicole Good, who was shot and killed by ICE agent Jonathan Ross in Minneapolis on January 7, highlights this issue. The shooting was captured on video, but the narrative presented by the White House and Department of Homeland Security claims that Ross acted in self-defense. However, visual investigations have revealed apparent contradictions between this narrative and what actually happened.
ICE agents are largely protected by qualified immunity, a legal doctrine that shields them from civil lawsuits for constitutional violations committed in the course of their duty. This has allowed agents to avoid accountability even when they have been accused of wrongdoing.
In recent years, state and local law enforcement agencies have consistently cleared ICE agents of wrongdoing after shootings, often citing lack of jurisdiction or the need for further investigation. However, this trend is unlikely to change anytime soon, given the Trump administration's efforts to shield ICE agents from prosecution.
The lack of accountability is not limited to ICE agents alone. The FBI, which investigates these incidents, has a history of slow-walking its investigations and rarely releasing results to the public. This has led to a perception that these agencies are above the law, with little incentive for agents to act with restraint in situations where deadly force may be necessary.
The situation is further complicated by the growing trend of shielding federal agents from prosecution. In 2023, President Trump instructed officials to protect ICE agents accused of crimes, and Vice President JD Vance has since referred to them as having "absolute immunity." This is a new term with no legal basis, and it raises serious concerns about the erosion of accountability in our justice system.
In conclusion, the lack of accountability among ICE agents is a symptom of a broader problem: an entrenched culture of impunity that allows federal agencies to operate with relative impunity. It will require sustained pressure from civil society, lawmakers, and law enforcement reform advocates to ensure that these agencies are held accountable for their actions and that justice is served.
ICE's use-of-force policies are outdated and lack transparency. The agency operates under an interim policy from 2004, which was last reviewed by the DHS Inspector General's Office in 2023. However, the results of these reviews are not made public, and it is unclear whether any changes have been made to the policies since then.
The case of Renee Nicole Good, who was shot and killed by ICE agent Jonathan Ross in Minneapolis on January 7, highlights this issue. The shooting was captured on video, but the narrative presented by the White House and Department of Homeland Security claims that Ross acted in self-defense. However, visual investigations have revealed apparent contradictions between this narrative and what actually happened.
ICE agents are largely protected by qualified immunity, a legal doctrine that shields them from civil lawsuits for constitutional violations committed in the course of their duty. This has allowed agents to avoid accountability even when they have been accused of wrongdoing.
In recent years, state and local law enforcement agencies have consistently cleared ICE agents of wrongdoing after shootings, often citing lack of jurisdiction or the need for further investigation. However, this trend is unlikely to change anytime soon, given the Trump administration's efforts to shield ICE agents from prosecution.
The lack of accountability is not limited to ICE agents alone. The FBI, which investigates these incidents, has a history of slow-walking its investigations and rarely releasing results to the public. This has led to a perception that these agencies are above the law, with little incentive for agents to act with restraint in situations where deadly force may be necessary.
The situation is further complicated by the growing trend of shielding federal agents from prosecution. In 2023, President Trump instructed officials to protect ICE agents accused of crimes, and Vice President JD Vance has since referred to them as having "absolute immunity." This is a new term with no legal basis, and it raises serious concerns about the erosion of accountability in our justice system.
In conclusion, the lack of accountability among ICE agents is a symptom of a broader problem: an entrenched culture of impunity that allows federal agencies to operate with relative impunity. It will require sustained pressure from civil society, lawmakers, and law enforcement reform advocates to ensure that these agencies are held accountable for their actions and that justice is served.