omg, this is a super messy situation for keir starmer 
! i mean, who appoints peter mandelson to u.s. ambassador without doing proper checks? it's like he's playing with fire and now everyone's gonna get burned 
. the thing is, starmer needs to take responsibility for his actions (or lack thereof) but at the same time, he can't just resign cuz that'd be a total cop-out 
. maybe what he needs to do is have an emergency party meeting and clear the air, get some fresh faces in, and move forward? idk, politics is always so complicated 
! i mean, who appoints peter mandelson to u.s. ambassador without doing proper checks? it's like he's playing with fire and now everyone's gonna get burned . the thing is, starmer needs to take responsibility for his actions (or lack thereof) but at the same time, he can't just resign cuz that'd be a total cop-out . maybe what he needs to do is have an emergency party meeting and clear the air, get some fresh faces in, and move forward? idk, politics is always so complicated 
. I mean, who appoints Peter Mandelson to a key role without doing their due diligence? It's not like Starmer is naive or anything, he's been in politics long enough to know how things work. But still, it's a huge mistake and now his whole team is losing faith in him 
.
. If he can't even get that right, how can we trust him with our votes? I'm not saying he should step down or anything (although some people might say that's the only option), but he needs to take responsibility for his actions and figure out what went wrong 
.
. But in the end, it's not about politics or party lines, it's about accountability and doing what's right 
.
, and I'm not surprised that Starmer's chief of staff quit 
. The fact that Mandelson was appointed to a major role without proper vetting is just crazy 
. And now, it's all coming back to haunt him 
. I think Starmer should consider stepping down, but at the same time, I'm not sure if that would make things better or worse 
.