Slipknot Dismisses Lawsuit Against Unauthorized Merchandise Site, Leaves Door Open to Future Action
In a surprise move, the members of Slipknot, known for their aggressive sound and intense live performances, have voluntarily dismissed a lawsuit they filed against the owner of Slipknot.com, a website not affiliated with the band that was accused of selling bootleg merchandise.
The band had claimed that the domain owner, who remains anonymous, had engaged in "cybersquatting" by allowing unauthorized parties to sell cheap promo products and costume masks bearing the group's logo. However, in a stunning development, lawyers for Slipknot have now dismissed the lawsuit without prejudice, leaving the door open for future action.
The move has been met with confusion, as the band had filed the original suit citing the Anti-Cybersquatting Consumer Protection Act and claimed that fans would be misled into purchasing unauthorized merchandise on the website. However, it appears that the band's lawyers may have come to realize that pursuing this case was not in their best interests.
The domain owner, Slipknot Online Services, Ltd., had registered the site in 2001 and had been unaware of the lawsuit until recently. Lawyers for the company claimed that they had waited too long to sue, given the fact that the band released its first record in 1999.
As a result of the dismissal, the website Slipknot.com remains functional but with no content on it, bearing a message stating "No valid delivery channels available for this domain. Copyright 2025." Meanwhile, the band's official website, Slipknot1.com, is still active but has no current tour dates planned.
It is unclear what sparked the sudden change of heart by the band or their lawyers, but one thing is clear: the battle over Slipknot merchandise rights continues to unfold.
In a surprise move, the members of Slipknot, known for their aggressive sound and intense live performances, have voluntarily dismissed a lawsuit they filed against the owner of Slipknot.com, a website not affiliated with the band that was accused of selling bootleg merchandise.
The band had claimed that the domain owner, who remains anonymous, had engaged in "cybersquatting" by allowing unauthorized parties to sell cheap promo products and costume masks bearing the group's logo. However, in a stunning development, lawyers for Slipknot have now dismissed the lawsuit without prejudice, leaving the door open for future action.
The move has been met with confusion, as the band had filed the original suit citing the Anti-Cybersquatting Consumer Protection Act and claimed that fans would be misled into purchasing unauthorized merchandise on the website. However, it appears that the band's lawyers may have come to realize that pursuing this case was not in their best interests.
The domain owner, Slipknot Online Services, Ltd., had registered the site in 2001 and had been unaware of the lawsuit until recently. Lawyers for the company claimed that they had waited too long to sue, given the fact that the band released its first record in 1999.
As a result of the dismissal, the website Slipknot.com remains functional but with no content on it, bearing a message stating "No valid delivery channels available for this domain. Copyright 2025." Meanwhile, the band's official website, Slipknot1.com, is still active but has no current tour dates planned.
It is unclear what sparked the sudden change of heart by the band or their lawyers, but one thing is clear: the battle over Slipknot merchandise rights continues to unfold.